Ariz. Admin. Code § R2-7-B310 - Offer Mistakes Discovered After Offer Opening and Before Award
A. If an apparent
mistake in an offer, relevant to the award determination, is discovered after
opening and before award, an agency chief procurement officer shall contact the
offeror for written confirmation of the offer. The agency chief procurement
officer shall designate a time-frame within which the offeror shall either:
1. Confirm that no mistake was made and
assert that the offer stands as submitted; or
2. Acknowledge that a mistake was made, and
include all of the following in a written response:
a. Explanation of the mistake and any other
relevant information;
b. A request
for correction including the corrected offer or a request for withdrawal;
and
c. The reasons why correction
or withdrawal is consistent with fair competition and in the best interest of
the state.
B.
An offeror who discovers a mistake in its offer may request correction or
withdrawal in writing and shall include all of the following in the written
request:
1. Explanation of the mistake and
any other relevant information;
2.
A request for correction including the corrected offer or a request for
withdrawal; and
3. The reasons why
correction or withdrawal is consistent with fair competition and in the best
interest of the state.
C. An agency chief procurement officer may
permit an offeror to correct a mistake if the mistake and the intended offer
are evident in the uncorrected offer; for example, an error in the extension of
unit prices. The agency chief procurement officer shall not permit a correction
that is prejudicial to the state or fair competition.
D. An agency chief procurement officer shall
permit an offeror to furnish information called for in the solicitation but not
supplied if the intended offer is evident and submittal of the information is
not prejudicial to other offerors.
E. An agency chief procurement officer shall
make a written determination of whether correction or withdrawal is permitted,
based on whether the action is consistent with fair competition and in the best
interest of the state.
F. If the
offeror fails to act under subsection (A) the offeror is considered
nonresponsive and the agency chief procurement officer shall place a written
determination that the offeror is nonresponsive in the procurement
file.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.