Ariz. Admin. Code § R4-17-403 - Rehearing or Review
A.
Except as provided in subsection (B), a party who is aggrieved by a decision
issued by the Board may file with the Board, no later than 30 days after
service of the decision, a written request for rehearing or review of the
decision, specifying the grounds for rehearing or review. For purposes of this
Section, a decision is considered to have been served when personally delivered
to the party's last known home or business address or five days after the
decision is mailed by certified mail to the party or the party's
attorney.
B. If the Board makes
specific findings that the immediate effectiveness of the decision is necessary
for the preservation of the public health and safety and determines that a
rehearing or review of the decision is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, the Board may issue the decision as a final decision
without an opportunity for rehearing or review. If the Board issues the
decision as a final decision, without an opportunity for a rehearing or review,
the aggrieved party may make an application for judicial review within the time
limits permitted for an application for judicial review of the Board's final
decision under A.R.S. §
12-904.
C. A party filing a request for rehearing or
review may amend the request at any time before it is ruled upon by the Board.
Another party may file a response within 15 days after the date the request or
amended request for rehearing is filed. The Board may require a party to file
supplemental memoranda explaining the issues raised in the request or response
and may permit oral argument.
D.
The Board may grant a rehearing or review of a decision for any of the
following causes materially affecting the requesting party's rights:
1. Irregularity in the Board's or
administrative law judge's administrative proceedings or any order or abuse of
discretion that deprived the party of a fair hearing;
2. Misconduct of the Board, administrative
law judge, or the prevailing party;
3. Accident or surprise that could not have
been prevented by ordinary prudence;
4. Newly discovered material evidence that
could not, with reasonable diligence, have been discovered and produced at the
original hearing;
5. Excessive or
insufficient penalties;
6. Error in
the admission or rejection of evidence, or other errors of law that occurred at
the hearing;
7. The decision is the
result of passion or prejudice; or
8. The decision or findings of fact are not
justified by the evidence or are contrary to law.
E. The Board may affirm or modify a decision
or grant rehearing or review on all or part of the issues for any of the
reasons set forth in subsection (D). An order granting a rehearing or review
shall specify each ground for the rehearing or review.
F. No later than 30 days after a decision is
issued by the Board, the Board on its own initiative may order a rehearing or
review for any reason in subsection (D).
G. When a request for rehearing or review is
based on affidavits, a party shall serve the affidavits with the request. The
opposing party may, within 10 days after service, serve opposing affidavits.
The Board may extend the time for serving opposing affidavits for no more than
20 days for good cause shown or by written stipulation by the parties. The
Board may permit reply affidavits.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.