Ariz. Admin. Code § R4-30-120 - Complaint Review Process
A.
The Board shall select a pool of volunteers who have submitted resumes and
letters of interest to serve on enforcement advisory committees ("EACs"). The
Executive Director shall select registrants and public members from the pool of
volunteers to serve on the committees as needed. When practicable, each
committee shall be comprised of one public member and a minimum of four
registrants, at least one of whom is registered in the same category or branch
as the respondent. The committee members shall provide technical assistance to
Board staff in the evaluation and investigation of complaints. A quorum of
three committee members is required for each committee meeting.
B. During the preliminary informal
investigation of a complaint, registrants named as respondents may appear
before an enforcement advisory committee ("EAC") relating to the complaint.
Respondents may elect to appear with or without counsel. The committee shall
attempt to assess the complaint and discuss the complaint with the respondent
and others, if deemed necessary, and prepare a recommendation for disposition
of the complaint.
C. Respondents
are not required to participate in the enforcement advisory committee meeting
and no inference shall be drawn from a respondent's decision not to
attend.
D. If a respondent chooses
not to attend the enforcement advisory committee meeting, the committee may
meet and review information presented by staff and others and prepare a
recommendation for disposition of the complaint.
E. The Board shall advise the respondent of
the committee recommendation.
F.
After the informal investigation has been completed, if the committee
recommendation supports a determination that the complaint is unfounded, the
recommendation shall be forwarded to the Board for review and final
disposition.
G. In all cases where
the advisory committee finds probable cause to believe that disciplinary action
is warranted, the staff will attempt to resolve the complaint informally by
obtaining a signed consent agreement from the respondent. The Board shall
review the committee recommendation, staff recommendation, consent agreement,
and, in the event a signed consent agreement cannot be obtained, any
counterproposal from the respondent.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.