Ariz. Admin. Code § R6-3-1503 - Proceedings before an Appeal Tribunal
AFiling an appeal. Any interested party to a
determination of a Deputy may appeal to an Appeal Tribunal within the time
limits listed in A.R.S. §
23-773(B).
The appellant may file the appeal personally, or by mail, fax, telephone, or
Internet.
1 If the appellant files the appeal
personally, by mail, or by fax the appellant or authorized agent shall sign the
appeal and file through any public employment office in the United States or
Canada, or directly with the Department of Economic Security.
2 If the appellant files the appeal by
telephone, the appellant shall use the telephone number listed on the
determination.
3 If the appellant
files by Internet, the appellant shall use the Internet application maintained
for that purpose on the Department's web site.
B. Appeal Tribunal hearings
1 Manner of holding hearings. The Appeal
Tribunal shall conduct all hearings in accordance with A.R.S. §
23-674,
in a manner that shall ascertain the substantial rights of all the interested
parties. The Appeal Tribunal shall require all testimony to be taken under oath
or affirmation.
2. Jurisdiction.
The Appeal Tribunal's decision and authority is confined solely to issues
arising under the Employment Security Law, A.R.S. Title 23, Chapter 4. In every
case, the Appeal Tribunal shall render a decision on the issues stated in the
notice of hearing. The Appeal Tribunal may also hear and decide any issues not
previously considered by the Deputy that arise during the hearing, provided all
interested parties waive the right to notice on the issues. If any interested
party is surprised by a new issue, and unprepared to proceed, the Appeal
Tribunal may continue the hearing, or may remand the matter to the Deputy for
consideration and action upon the issue.
3. Failure of a party to appear
h.
i Any interested party
may appeal, in writing, to the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board from the
decision of a hearing officer that denies reopening for lack of good cause, as
defined in subsection (B)(3)(d). The party shall file the appeal within 15
calendar days after mailing or electronic transmission of the decision denying
reopening. If the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board reverses the denial to
reopen, the Board shall remand the case to the Appeal Tribunal and the Tribunal
shall reschedule the case for hearing on the merits in accordance with
R6-3-1502.
j.
k
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, an appellee who fails to appear may
appeal to the Appeals Board from an adverse decision on the merits within 15
calendar days after mailing or electronic transmission of the decision is
served on the party.
a. If an interested party fails to appear at
a scheduled hearing, the Appeal Tribunal may:
i. Adjourn the hearing to a later date;
or
ii. Proceed to review the
evidence of record and other admissible evidence as may be presented at the
scheduled hearing, and make a disposition or decision on the merits of the
case.
b If the Appeal
Tribunal issues a decision adverse to any interested party that failed to
appear at a scheduled hearing, that party may file one written request for a
hearing to determine whether good cause exists to reopen the hearing. The
interested party shall file the request to reopen within 15 calendar days of
the mailing date of the decision or disposition, and shall list the reasons for
the failure to appear.
c The Appeal
Tribunal shall hold a hearing to determine whether there was good cause for the
failure to appear, and in the discretion of the hearing officer, to review the
merits of the case. Upon a finding of good cause for failure to appear at the
scheduled hearing, the Appeal Tribunal shall vacate the disposition or decision
on the merits and reschedule the case for hearing under
R6-3-1502, unless the hearing on the merits is held concurrently with the good cause
hearing.
d A party shall establish
good cause warranting reopening of a case upon proof that both the failure to
appear and failure to timely notify the hearing officer were either beyond the
reasonable control of the nonappearing party or due to excusable
neglect.
e. A party may obtain only
one good cause hearing for each hearing scheduled on the merits, therefore:
i. If a party does not appear at the
scheduled good cause hearing, a party may file a written request for review to
determine whether good cause exists for failure to appear at both the good
cause hearing and the original hearing on the merits.
ii If the Appeal Tribunal reopens a case upon
a finding of good cause, and the party fails to appear at the time and date of
the new hearing, the party may file a written request for review to determine
whether good cause exists for failure to appear at the new hearing.
f A request for review of an
Appeal Tribunal decision shall state the reasons for the party's failure to
appear. The party shall attach copies of any documentation supporting the
request.
g. The Appeal Tribunal
shall review the request and the evidence of record to determine whether there
is good cause to reopen the hearing on the issue of good cause or on the merits
and shall issue a decision accordingly.
h An interested party may file any request to
reopen personally, or by mail, fax, or internet.
j. If an appellant fails to appear or waive
appearance, the Appeal Tribunal may enter a default disposition in accordance
with
R6-3-1502(A)(4)
without further right to appeal except as provided in this Section.
CFinality of Appeal Tribunal decision. Under
A.R.S. §
23-671, the
decision of the Appeal Tribunal becomes final unless an interested party files
a written petition for review within 15 calendar days after mailing or
electronic transmission to the interested parties, or the Appeals Board assumes
jurisdiction over the matter on its own motion. After a decision of the Appeal
Tribunal has become final, the matter shall not be reopened, reconsidered, or
reheard, and the decision shall not be changed except to correct clerical
errors. Any interested party may file a petition for review personally, or by
mail, fax, or Internet.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.