Ariz. Admin. Code § R6-3-51390 - Relations with Fellow Employees (misconduct 390)
A. General (Misconduct 390.05). An employer
has the right to expect that his employees will not conduct themselves toward
each other in such manner as to interfere unduly with the routine or efficient
conduct of his business. Temperamental inability to get along with fellow
employees is not deemed to be misconduct connected with the work. Only when
incompatibility manifests itself in an overt act which could impair the
efficiency of operations, or could result in injury to the employer's interest
may it be deemed misconduct.
B.
Abusive or profane language (Misconduct 390.1)
1. The use of abusive or profane language may
be work connected misconduct depending upon the circumstances. If the
employment is of a nature that the use of such language interferes with the
proper routine of the employer's business, misconduct exists as there is a
violation of the employee's duty to the employer.
2. At some work sites mildly abusive and
profane language are accepted as normal standards of behavior. The use of such
language in those employment situations does not constitute misconduct. Only
when it is used in such a belligerent or vociferous manner that there is
interference with good order and discipline at the establishment can misconduct
be established.
3. The occasional
use of profanity is not misconduct unless it leads to dissatisfaction and
discord among employees, and the employer had previously warned against its
use.
C. Altercation or
assault (Misconduct 390.2). Fighting with a fellow employee on the employer's
premises is generally considered to be misconduct connected with the work.
However, if the claimant is acting in self-defense or the evidence indicates
that the fault and first blow or attempted assault rests with the other
employee, the claimant is not deemed to have committed an act of misconduct
connected with the work.
D.
Annoyance of fellow employee (Misconduct 390.25)
1. If an individual molests, knowingly
irritates, or otherwise annoys his fellow employees during working hours, he
shall be considered to have committed an act of misconduct connected with the
work unless the disagreeable situation resulted from good faith actions or in
connection with the worker's responsibilities.
2. Ordinary bickering with or "baiting" a
fellow employee generally is not deemed misconduct conducted with the work
unless it becomes potentially harmful to the employer and the worker has been
made aware through general rules or warnings that he must avoid or discontinue
such action(s).
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.