Ariz. Admin. Code § R6-3-53500 - Wages (refusal of Work 500)
A. Prior earnings, comparison with (Refusal
of Work 500.35)
1. Whether a claimant has
good cause for refusing an offer of work in his customary occupation based
solely on the grounds that the wages offered are less than those earned
previously depends on:
a. Prospect of
securing the wages he specifies.
b.
Length of unemployment.
c.
Condition of the labor market in his locality at that time.
2. Prior earnings are those
received most recently especially, when the claimant has been receiving those
earnings for a substantial period. If the worker's most recent earnings cover a
brief period, such earnings need not be considered prior earnings unless they
represent his present earning ability.
B. Prevailing rate (Refusal of Work 500.7)
1. No work shall be deemed suitable and
benefits shall not be denied to an otherwise eligible individual for refusing
to accept new work if the wages of the work offered are substantially less
favorable to the individual than those prevailing for similar work in the
locality.
2. The key words and
phrases are:
a. "Similar work." Is work
closely related to the job being considered and generally recognized as of the
same type. Actual comparison of jobs must be made on the basis of the
similarity of the work done without regard to title; that is, the similarity of
the operations performed, the skill, ability, knowledge required, and the
responsibilities involved. Other factors such as hours of employment,
permanency of the work, unionization, vacation, sick, and retirement benefits
are conditions of work and should be considered only after the question of what
is similar work is decided.
b.
"Locality." Conditions offered are to be compared with the conditions of
similar work in the locality where the work is to be done. In establishing the
competitive labor market locality for an occupation, the dominant
considerations are the location of the establishments employing similar
services; the area from which workers are normally drawn to supply the needs of
these establishments; the commuting practices and ease of transportation in the
locality; and the customary migration pattern of the workers in the
occupation.
c. "Wages." The
customary practice of the trade in the area should be used in determining what
constitutes wages. The comparison of wage rates alone, however, is not always
sufficient to determine if the wages offered a claimant is substantially less
favorable than those prevailing for similar work in the locality. Earnings are
frequently affected not only by the wage rate and hours of work, but also by
the method of payment, the overtime practices, and various extra bonuses and
premiums. Only by taking all of the factors which would affect the claimant's
earnings, and those of most workers in similar employment in the locality into
consideration can it be determined whether the wages offered are less favorable
than those prevailing.
d.
"Prevailing." The prevailing wage means the most outstanding or commonly paid
rate for the largest number of workers enjoyed in similar work in a locality.
The model rate has generally been recognized as that prevailing where less than
a majority, but as many as 40% of the workers in similar work are paid at the
same rate. Therefore, when there is a single rate at which at least 40% of the
workers in similar work are employed, that rate is prevailing. In the event
there is no 40% mode, the prevailing rate may be determined by using the
average or median wage as the standard for comparison, based on the best
information available. The prevailing starting rate should be obtained in the
same manner as the prevailing rate. The mode, must of necessity, be used in
determining the prevailing conditions of work when fringe benefits are
involved, since fringe benefits cannot be measured in numbers and cannot be
averaged.
e. "Substantially less
favorable." The meaning of the phrase "substantially less favorable to the
individual" cannot be determined in terms of any fixed percent age, amount, or
degree of difference. Both the actual conditions of the work in question and
the extent of the difference, as well as its effect on the worker must be
considered. The basis for comparison in each case insofar as they can be
determined is the conditions under which the greatest number of workers in the
particular occupation are employed in the locality. If the conditions of the
offered work and those prevailing are known, it is usually easy to determine
whether the difference is of a material or substantial nature or is of no real
consequence. However, in borderline cases, where it is not clear whether the
difference is material, the claimant should not be subject to a
disqualification for refusing work unless it is reasonably certain that the
conditions on the job are not substantially less favorable than those
prevailing for similar work in the locality.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.