Ariz. Admin. Code § R9-18-406 - Compliance Monitoring
A.
Submission of an application for a marijuana testing facility license
constitutes permission for:
1. The
Department's entry to and inspection of the marijuana testing facility,
and
2. The Department to conduct
proficiency testing according to R9-18-407.
B. The Department shall conduct:
1. Except for a marijuana testing facility
licensed pursuant to R9-18-402(B), an initial marijuana testing facility
inspection; and
2. A follow-up
marijuana testing facility inspection, at least annually.
C. The Department shall comply with A.R.S.
§
41-1009
in conducting a marijuana testing facility inspection or
investigation.
D. The Department
shall not accept allegations of a marijuana testing facility's noncompliance
with A.R.S. Title 36, Chapter 28.2 or this Chapter from an anonymous
source.
E. If the Department
receives an allegation of a marijuana testing facility's noncompliance with
A.R.S. Title 36, Chapter 28.2 or this Chapter, the Department may conduct an
unannounced inspection of the marijuana testing facility.
F. If the Department determines that a
marijuana testing facility is not in compliance with the requirements of A.R.S.
Title 36, Chapter 28.2, or this Chapter, the Department:
1. Shall provide the owner, according to
R9-18-401(A), and technical laboratory director with a written notice that
includes the specific rule or statute that was violated; and
2. May:
a.
Take an enforcement action as described in R9-18-415; or
b. Require that the technical laboratory
director submit to the Department, within 30 calendar days after written notice
from the Department, a corrective action plan to address issues of compliance
that do not directly affect the health or safety of a consumer or marijuana
facility agent that:
i. Describes how each
identified instance of noncompliance will be corrected and reoccurrence
prevented, and
ii. Includes a date
for correcting each instance of noncompliance that is appropriate to the
actions necessary to correct the instance of noncompliance.
G. Under
A.R.S. §
41-1009(G) and (I), the Department's decision regarding
whether a technical laboratory director may submit a corrective action plan on
behalf of a marijuana testing facility or whether a deficiency has been
corrected or has been corrected within a reasonable period of time is not an
appealable agency action as defined by A.R.S. §
41-1092.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.