203.00.13 Ark. Code R. § 003 - Revisions to the Rules Governing Academic Facilities Partnership Program
When a school district is proposing a new construction project on an existing campus with existing educational facilities, the district shall submit a POR of the existing campus and the Division shall compare the appropriate existing total gross square footage space of the existing facility on the campus to the total gross square footage space requirements of the POR for the proposed new school facility based on the projected student enrollment by grade level. After making the comparison, the school will only be deemed to not be suitable and thus eligible for state financial participation on a proposed facility project for the additional gross square footage space required in the POR not currently available on the school campus (based on the Division's campus reports or other confirmed information made available to the Division) or on other campuses affected by grade reconfigurations as part of the project. The district shall submit PORs for all campuses and grades affected by the grade reconfigurations which are a part of the project. However, the state recognizes that four particular space areas existing in school districts on or before 2008 may skew the comparison of existing space to that of the required POR space. Therefore, the Division will not count as existing space that total gross footage area above the required POR standard for the following four areas that existed on or before 2008: Physical Education, Media Center, Student Dining and Performing Arts.
When a school district is proposing a new construction project on a school campus for which the Division determines there are no other currently existing appropriate school facilities or the district is seeking a separate LEA number for the new academic facility, the district shall submit a POR for the new school campus and the Division shall compare the total gross square footage required by the POR for the proposed facility for the appropriate student grade population to that currently existing total gross square footage available in the district (based on the Division's campus and district reports or other confirmed information made available to the Division) for the appropriate student grade population in their final grade configuration less the gross square footage to be demolished as part of the proposed project. The Division shall also include other campuses and grades affected by grade reconfigurations as part of the project. The district shall submit PORs for all campuses and grades affected by the grade reconfigurations which are a part of the project. After making the comparison the school will only be deemed to not be suitable and thus eligible for state financial participation on a proposed facility project for that additional space required in the POR not currently available in the school district for the appropriate student population in their final grade reconfiguration. The State recognizes that four particular space areas existing in the school district may skew the comparison as mentioned above in Section 3.34.1 of these Rules in the "on an existing campus" comparison. As a result, the Division will give the same consideration and not count as existing space that total gross footage area above the required POR standard already existing in the district on or before 2008.
* Warm, safe, and dry;
* New facilities;
* Add-ons and/or Conversions; and
* Consolidation/annexation projects.
If the state provides financial participation for an add-on or conversion project, or a consolidation/annexation project that adds space to an existing campus, the district must construct any missing component to the POR specification. The district will have to submit a POR showing a component contained in the POR it does not have and add it, in the following order:
* Academic Core Areas;
* Special Education;
* Student Dining;
* Administrative
The state will not participate in add-on projects concerning gymnasiums, media centers and/or auditoriums if the district already has this space or is in need (according to the POR) of Academic Core Areas, Special Education or Student Dining Areas.
The state will consider the replacement of demolished space to be a prudent and resourceful expenditure of state funds issue. School districts are encouraged to discuss such issues with the state before entering into demolition projects when the districts will be filing applications for state partnership assistance.
School districts applying for state financial participation for projects that support their Facilities Master Plan shall file applications (and approved PORs and schematic drawings) in a format prescribed by the Division and shall list the applications in the district's Facilities Master Plan. No project shall be considered for state financial partnership participation unless it is included in the district's Facilities Master Plan.
First, the Division shall numerically rank all school projects based on the Facilities Wealth Index of the school district. The districts with the least Wealth Index shall be ranked first with the districts with the greater Wealth Index numerically ranked last.
Second, the Division shall numerically rank all school projects based on the third-quarter average daily membership (ADM) of the school district for the school year in which the application for state partnership assistance is filed. The districts with the least ADM shall be ranked first with the districts with the greater ADM numerically ranked last.
Third, the Division shall average the numerical ADM and Wealth Index ranking of each school's project. Once each project is averaged, the Division shall establish a ranked order with the projects with the lowest average score being ranked first and the projects with the highest average score being ranked last.
Warm, safe, and dry (systems) projects shall receive ranking of first order prior to any other partnership project only to the extent that the total state financial participation in all warm, safe, and dry (systems) projects does not exceed $10 million in the aggregate for each year of the Project Funding Cycle, or $20 million in the aggregate for the Project Funding Cycle. All otherwise eligible warm, safe, and dry (systems) projects that, because of their ranking, are beyond the aggregate statewide $10 million limitation, will not be funded.
For the 2015-2017 and 2017-2019 project funding cycles, all new facilities, add-ons, and conversion partnership projects which are approved by the Commission because a school district or campus is currently deemed not suitable shall be ranked and, thus, entitled to receive state partnership assistance in a ranking of second order prior to any other partnership project according to the following procedure of ranked order, subject to the availability of funds:
The Division shall numerically rank all new facilities, add-ons, and conversion projects based on a ten (10) year actual growth of student population review with the districts with the greatest percentage of growth being ranked first and districts with the least percentage of student growth ranked last. The growth is measured by showing (on a percentage basis) the student population growth when comparing the three quarter average daily membership of the district ten (10) years ago to the district's three quarter average daily membership in the previously completed school year. If a district has not been in existence for at least ten (10) school years as a result of the annexation or consolidation of other districts into it or with it, then for any years within the last ten (10) years for which the district was not in existence its three quarter average daily membership shall be the sum of the three quarter average daily membership of those former school districts that now comprise the school district applying for state financial participation.
Conversion projects will be reviewed against POR requirements to determine compliance with the POR. If the Division determines that the project qualifies for state financial participation, then the project will be subject to the conditions set forth in Sections 4.00 and 5.00 of these Rules. After the 2017-2019 project funding cycle, projects in this Section shall be entitled to receive state partnership assistance in a ranking of first priority order.
For the 2015-2017 and 2017-2019 project funding cycles, all warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) new construction projects for which the Commission determines that a school district is currently not in suitable condition shall be entitled to receive state partnership assistance in a ranking of third order prior to any other partnership project according to the following procedure of ranked order, subject to the availability of funds. To the extent there is limited funding available, the warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) projects shall be prioritized according to the school district's Wealth Index and the campus or campuses value (depending upon the type of project for which the district applies for state partnership assistance).
First, the Division shall numerically rank all warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) projects based on the campus (or campuses) value depending on what type of project is proposed. The projects with the lowest campus value shall be ranked first and in ascending order to the projects with the greatest campus value.
Second, the Division shall numerically rank all warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) projects based on the Facilities Wealth Index of the school district. The districts with the least Wealth Index shall be ranked first with the districts with the greater Wealth Index numerically ranked last.
Third, the Division shall average the campus value and Wealth Index ranking of each school's warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) project. Once each project is averaged, the Division shall establish a ranked order with the projects with the lowest average score being ranked first and the projects with the highest average score being ranked last.
Any project for which the Commission determines the district or campus is currently suitable shall not be entitled for any state partnership assistance in that year's partnership cycle.
The suitability analysis and determination of warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) projects shall be performed as per Section 3.34.
After the 2017-2019 project funding cycle, projects in this Section shall be entitled to receive state partnership assistance in a ranking of second priority order.
All projects that fall within the definition of "consolidation/annexation project" listed in Section 3.11 above and that meet all of the requirements of this Section shall be entitled to apply for state Partnership assistance. To the extent that funding is available, consolidation/annexation projects shall be evaluated and funded based upon the following criteria:
Growth: Index: For those projects meeting the definition of a "consolidation/annexation" project and which comply with the requirements of this Section, the Division will numerically rank the consolidated/annexed school district's growth index at the greater of the following two levels:
The Division's notice of its decision on a school district's application for state financial participation in a new construction project shall include an explanation of the evaluation factors underlying the decision of the Division to provide or not provide state financial participation in support of the new construction project.
Construction of the project, as evidenced by a signed construction contract, must begin within eighteen (18) months from the date of the final approval of the project by the Commission. The district must obtain the Division's approval of the completion of all district project requirements within four (4) years from the date of final approval of the project by the Commission. For the purposes of this subsection, the phrase "signed construction contract" includes construction management contracts.
A district may request a waiver of timelines in Section 7.07 of these Rules if the district believes it can show unusual and limited circumstances which prevent it from meeting the timelines. State financial participation in a district's project is contingent upon the district meeting all timelines and deadlines set forth in these Rules. Absent an approved appeal or waiver, the Division may render the state's financial participation in a district's project null and void in whole or in part for failure to meet all of the timelines and deadlines set forth in these Rules and may recapture any state partnership funding assistance funds already paid to the district.
APPENDIX "A"
INTRODUCTION
The Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) is charged with overseeing the design and construction of school facilities in the state of Arkansas. The Arkansas School Facility Manual has been developed to provide consistent, clear information for school districts and design professionals as a new generation of schools is being created for Arkansas. The Standards & Guidelines contained within this section are the culmination of standards, accepted procedures, statutory requirements, and the experience of experts and authorities throughout the United States and establish a uniform level of quality for all public school buildings. The Standards & Guidelines will apply to new school facilities and new additions to existing buildings. Renovation to existing facilities should adhere to the Standards & Guidelines as outlined in Section 1200.
Since the Standards & Guidelines must communicate information about so many issues, the length and quantity of the document can be intimidating. However, understanding how the Standards & Guidelines is organized and which information will be needed during the various phases of the process will enable each participant to be better prepared for the exciting opportunity of creating school facilities.
An important consideration in developing a state-wide program that must provide equity among districts is the balance between broadly applicable standards and program delivery. A fundamental tenet of educational facility planning is that school facilities must be responsive to a school district's educational program. The Standards & Guidelines allows districts to develop building programs that respond to their current, unique needs as well as prepare for their educational future. There are also many different ways in which districts are delivering educational programs and helping students accomplish learning objectives at every school and school level. By designing classrooms and other instructional spaces to be flexible and adaptable, individual districts are better prepared to accommodate future educational program developments.
Throughout the planning, design, and construction phases of a project there are three factors that must be considered and held in balance: quality, cost, and time (schedule). The Standards & Guidelines was created to provide parameters for bafancing these three essential elements fairly for all projects throughout the state.
The Standards & Guidelines are intended as a starting point for architects, engineers, other design professionals, and school districts to develop solutions to meet the needs of the individual school community. The information is provided to allow the planning, design, and construction process to proceed most efficiently, without undo restriction on the design of the facilities, focusing efforts on the creation of best possible school facilities for each project rather than "reinventing the wheel".
The Arkansas School Facility Manual is the exclusive property of the Arkansas Department of Education of the State of Arkansas, and the Arkansas Department of Education reserves the right to add, delete, modify, or otherwise change the content of this manual at any time. Specific information contained within the manual will be periodically modified to reflect current and future trends in teaching methodologies, construction and educational technologies, and lessons learned as Arkansas proceeds with the ongoing task of improving and ^maintaining its schools.
The Standards & Guidelines are organized into seven chapters that explain the planning, design, and construction process; suggest current educational best practices and facility planning concepts, recommend components of an education framework, identify the square footage provisions for each school level; detail the features and amenities of each space; and provide systems, materials, guidelines information; and technology infrastructure recommendations. This chapter contains an outline of the information found within this section of the Arkansas School Facility Manual and a summary of the standards and guidelines contained within each chapter.
The chapters included in this section of the Arkansas Schoof Facility Manual are:
Chapter 1 contains introductory information that indicates the organization of Section Two; an executive summary highlighting the standards and guidelines; a glossary of general Arkansas School Facility Manual definitions and abbreviations; and a general overview of the planning, design, and construction process intended to respond to the educational facility needs of Arkansas schools.
Chapter 2 contains planning concepts rel ated to current educational best practices, special education, workforce development, and program and design capacity. The facility planning concepts contained within this chapter are intended to be informative only and are not standards.
Chapter 3 contains a series of broad principles associated with organizational, facility, program, and service issues, including: grade configuration, school size, and class size. In conjunction with the Chapter 2: Educational Facility Planning Concepts, Chapter 3 provides assistance when developing an educational facility.
Chapter 4 contains information about site size and site amenities. Guidelines are also outlined for a multitude of factors that must be considered, including: various types of circulation and site access, drainage, play fields and playgrounds, fencing, lighting, mechanical/ Chapter 5 assists the school district in establishing the size and quantity of instructional and support spaces for construction of a new facility or an electrical yard, landscaping, site furnishings, and exterior security 'provisions.
Chapter 5 assists the school district in establishing the size and quantity of instructional and support spaces for construction of a new facility or an addition to an existing facility. The size of a school facility is based on totai student population and grade configuration. The Program of Requirements identifies an overall square feet for a facility and then identifies spaces that must be included and provides an allowance for additional support spaces that the district may choose based on their programs and method of delivery.
Chapter 6 contains space plates for each type of space in the Programs of Requirements. Most space plates contain a graphic representation and information related to features, loose furnishings, finishes, and notes.
Chapter 7 provides an overview and examples of the various materials and systems that have been used to establish a design standard and level of quality for the systems and materials to be incorporated into new school buildings and additions to existing school buildings.
The Standards and Guidelines contain a vast number of educational planning, facility design, and construction concepts. The next few pages serve as a summary of the standards and guidelines contained within Section Two of the Arkansas School Facility Manual. For additional information, refer to the various chapters for clarification.
Standards are identified by bolded text. Guidelines are identified as regular text.
|
Chapter |
Standards & Guidelines |
Notes |
|
3 |
GRADE CONFIGURATION The Program of Requirements has been developed to address any K-12 grade configuration. |
|
|
3 |
CLASS SIZE: A. Pre-Kindergarten/Kindergarten 20 students B. 1st Grade through 3rd Grade 25 students C. 4th Grade through 6th Grade 28 students D. 7th Grade through 12th Grade 30 students E. Workforce Development 30 students |
Districts may decrease class size by adding teaching stations at their own expense or by utilizing innovative program delivery methods that allow multiple uses of spaces. |
|
5 |
SQUARE FOOT PER STUDENT A. A gross square foot per student for the overall building may be calculated using the total student population and the total gross square feet indicated by the Program of Requirements. B. The Program of Requirements indicates the following approximate square foot per student ranges: 1. ES = -119-151 2. MS = -124 -182 3. HS = -161-243 4. PK-8 = Blended 5. PK-12 = Blended |
Total student population is established by the highest projected enrollment beginning three years out from the date of the 10-year projection. |
|
5 |
NET AND GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE The net square footage will be composed of the following two components: A. Required Spaces. The Program of Requirements identifies the quantity and size of all required spaces to provide an adequate education. B. Support Space Allowance. The Program of Requirements provides a net square foot allowance for districts to provide flexibility for their instructional programs. Districts must include the indicated support space allowance in a new school. Support space allowance shall not be used to increase the size of gymnasiums or auditoriums. C. The gross square footage will be equal to the net square footage plus a construction factor that accounts for wall thickness and equal to 10 of the total net square footage. |
Size of the building is driven by the total number of students. The percentage of support space allowance is 10% for elementary school spaces and 15% for middle and high school spaces. |
|
5 |
SIZE MODIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL SPACES A. The size standard for all individual required spaces is established by the Programs of Requirements located in Chapter 5. B. Sizes indicated by the Programs of Requirements located in Chapter 5 for support spaces are not intended to be standards but to serve as guidelines for planning and design purposes. C. Individual required spaces may NOT be removed or reduced in size. |
The selection of support spaces is limited only by the following basic rules: a. The standard for total gross square footage must be met. Any overages will be at district expense. |
|
4 |
SITE SIZE A. The recommended site sizes are: 1. Elementary School: 10 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students 2. Middle School: 20 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students 3. High School: 35 acres plus 1 acre per 100 |
The site sizes shown should be considered as the minimum size to provide adeq uate pedestrian & vehicular circulation, parking for staff, students, & visitors, and playgrounds and playfields. |
|
students 4. Combination Schools: a. PK-12 School: 40 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students b. PK-8 School: 20 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students B. Deviations from the site size may be required because of extenuating circumstances. The site sizes shown should be considered. |
When selecting a site, the District should consider current and future student needs, changing demographics, and possible development around the site. It is recognized that not all sites, especially urban sites, will be able to meet those recommendations. The Design Professional, working with the District, should make every attempt to meet as many of the recommendations as possible. |
|
|
5 |
PROGRAMS The following programs are guidelines, it is the responsibility of each district to determine the appropriate programs for their students. The programs listed below were used to develop the spaces contained in the Programs of Requirements. A. Elementary Schools 1. Academic Core 2. Special Education 3. Visual Arts 4. Music 5. Physical Education B. Middle Schools 1. Academic Core 2. Special Education 3. Visual Arts 4. Music 5. Technology Education 6. Family and Consumer Sciences 7. Physical Education 8. Workforce Development C. High Schools 1. Academic Core 2. Special Education 3. Visual Arts 4. Music 5. Physical Education 6. Workforce Development 7. Alternative Education |
Combination Schools contain the programs from which those schools are comprised. Example: A Pre-K - 8 school would contain all the elementary school programs and the middle school programs. Workforce development is an exception. Accreditation Requirements make it necessary for all comprehensive high schools to make available at least three programs of study from three different occupational areas. Refer to Workforce Development in Chapter 2. |
|
5 |
SIZE OF SPECIFIC SPACES The following sizes are standards from the Programs of Requirements in Chapter 5. The spaces listed below are intended to be samples and representative of typical spaces. Regular Classrooms 850 SQFT Pre-Kindergarten/Kindergarten Classrooms1,000 SQFT Special Education Classrooms 850 SQFT Resource Room 450 SQFT Art Classroom 1,200 SQFT Music Classroom 1,200 SQFT Student Dining 50% TSP x 15 SQFT/Student |
TSP = Total Student Population The Program of Requirements contained in Chapter 5 details the size and quantity of all instructional and support space allowances that must be included in new school construction. |
|
7 |
EXTERIOR WALLS A. Options available for numerous, insulated wall systems. B. All systems to be well insulated and have moisture barrier. |
Minimum insulation R values. 40-year minimum lifespan. |
|
7 |
ROOFS A. New construction to be sloped or low slope roof system. B. Options available for numerous, UL class "A" systems with warranties. C. Vapor barrier are critical for weather protection. |
Meet "energy star" values Minimum, thermal resistant U-values. |
|
7 |
OPENINGS A. All academic spaces to have natural daylight. B. Minimize east and west facing glass. C. Interior wood doors to be solid core and factory finished. |
Encourage top lighting. Provide uniform light distribution. Select formaldehyde-free doors constructed with recycled or recovered content. |
|
7 |
INTERIOR FLOOR FINISHES A. Use water-based coatings and adhesives. B. Options available for soft and hard surface flooring. C. Choose low-VOC emitting materials. D. Meet carpet "green label plus" rating and use carpet reclamation programs. |
Use products containing recycled content. |
|
7 |
PLUMBING A. Water piping should not be installed under floor slabs. B. Domestic water systems within the building shall be type "K" or "L" copper tubing. |
No additional notes. |
|
7 |
HVAC A. All new construction will include air conditioning. B. Several systems are available and selection shall be based on a life cycle cost analysis. A. All temperature control systems shall be electronic, direct digital controls. B. Commissioning of HVAC is recommended. |
All systems shall be designed in compliance with ASHRAE standard 90.1 Energy Code. Control indoor and outdoor HVAC noise. |
|
7 |
ELECTRICAL A. Conductors shall only be copper. B. All branch circuits circuits should be run above ceilings and within walls. C. Interior lighting shall be controlled by occupancy sensors, automatic timed lighting controlled system or a combination of both. |
Within building electric system, provide technology infrastructure such as cable trays, conduit, boxes, etc. |
|
8 |
TECHNOLOGY A. All instructional spaces will be wired for voice, video, data, and power. B. All offices and meeting spaces will be wired for voice, data, and power. |
Selected offices may also be wired for video. |
SCHOOL FACILITY BUILDING PROGRAMS
EXISTING FACILITIES
SAFE, DRY, and HEALTHY
PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT
Each building project shall begin with a PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT intended to develop a detailed scope of work as required to achieve "safe, dry, and healthy" criteria. The scope of work shall become the program for design and the 'yardstick' to measure the highest priority deficiencies in existing buildings. The following checklist would be used in the order of the priority indicated.
PRIORITY I
For example:
For example:
For example:
leaking
damaged
inadequate moisture barriers
inadequate insulation
inadequate drainage
flashings and accessories
PRIORITY II
PRIORITY III
PRIORITY IV
IMPLEMENTATION OF STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
Click here to view image
GENERAL ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL DEFINITIONS
Construction Factor
The construction factor shown is the area of a building which is used for wall thickness, pipe chase, lockers, etc., in the wall.
Distance Learning
The process of transmitting and/or receiving instruction and demonstration via video and/or audio means.
Guideline
A guide or recommendation; not required.
ORFF
Large instruments capable of being beat upon by children.
School District
A general term applied to a legally constituted school entity which is governed by a Board of Education. They may include city, local, exempted village, and joint vocational school districts.
Standard
A rule and requirement; mandatory.
Urban Sites
School facility sites that are reduced in size because of being land-locked or restricted by the topography.
Workforce Development
Programs at the 6-12 grade level to prepare students for entry into skilled work occupations.
INTRODUCTION
This chapter contains information that may be used by the Project Team regarding current and future educational "best practices", rules and regulations for students with disabilities, and current standards for Workforce Development programs in the State of Arkansas.
It is important to note that as the School District, Educational Planner, and Design Professionais begin to discuss the design, construction' or renovation of school facilities that time be allotted to consider what students will require to help them to be successful in the future. . Consideration should be given to current and future trends in educational programs and delivery methods, changes in coursework, impact of technology on teaching methods, and social, economical, and world issues.
This chapter along with Chapter 3 should provide the Project Team with "fodder" to fuel the creative thinking process and develop a school facility that not only meets the standards and guidelines, but positions the district to achieve the highest results in student education.
OVERVIEW
Public education is at a unique point in history. We have transitioned from the industrial age to the information age, and as most organizations have already done, school districts across the country are considering changing the way they do business. School districts are investigating curricula, organizational models, current and emerging technologies, the roie of administration, and their local communities to determine the effect each of these has on student performance.
These investigations have resulted in a series of educational "best practices" intended to provide students with the greatest opportunity for success. Implementing educational "best practices" can have a significant impact on facilities. The following describes a few educational "best practices", cites examples where they have been implemented, and expresses the impact each has on facilities. The information included with the examples is to help facilitate the planning, design and construction of school facilities.
CURRICULUM
Offer Essential Knowledge, Integrate It, and Make Connections to Real Life
Investigation and research suggest that the core of the high school curriculum must offer both the substance and the practicality to prepare students for an uncertain future. The curriculum should strive to meet individual needs without compromising larger goals. Dr. Willard Daggett, President of the International Center for Leadership in Education and a national expert on education, claims that schools should "make education
Click here to view image
rigorous and relevant for all students." Daggett uses a Rigor and Relevance Matrix to categorize curricula into one of four quadrants. Daggett defines rigor as the level of Bloom's Taxonomy achieved in any given lesson. He defines relevance as a continuum ranging from "knowledge in one discipline" to "applications to real-world unpredictable situations."
In an effort to make curricuium rigorous and relevant, ail sophomores at Oxford Hills Comprehensive High School, located in South Paris, Maine, take a class called the Human Experience (HumEx), which combines the study of math, biology, English and social studies. At the core of the integrated HumEx class is a problem-based approach to the curriculum. Instead of students simply studying content, they are expected to study, understand and then apply the content to a specific, "real" problem. During the school year '02 - '03, the students were charged with creating and maintaining their own model community. To solve the problem, the students studied ecology, philosophy, genetics, literature, economy, geometry, algebra, statistics, government, and poetry.
Adopting curricula that offer essential knowledge, integrated approaches, and connections to real life can have a significant impact on facilities. Facilities may require student production spaces for the creation of projects, small group rooms for collaboration, and large group presentation spaces for students to show their work.
ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS
Provide Student-Centered House Approach
Student-centered approaches provide students with a variety of opportunities to learn and develop skills and competencies based on their individual needs. Organizational models such as grade-level teaming, schools-with-in-a-school, and thematic approaches often characterize these student-centered approaches.
"Best practices" may suggest that facilities be organized into houses, instructional units comprised of classroom spaces, student production spaces, and teacher preparation areas. "Best practices" may also suggest that double-loaded corridor designs cannot provide the flexibility necessary to accommodate multiple organizational models nor can they foster the same level of cooperation, teaming, and sharing of professional resources as house designs.
Grade-level teaming is based on organizing the building into, separate grade-level units. Grade-ievel teams typically utilize an interdisciplinary approach.
Medina High School, located in Medina, Ohio, is organized into six 600-student grade-level houses. Each house contains learning centers, regular classrooms, for each of the core academic content areas [i.e. mathematics, science, English, social studies, foreign language, and business]. Students in each respective grade-leve! take their core academics in their house leaving only for specialty areas such as physical education, visual and performing arts,, and technology education. The goal of the grade-level teaming model for Medina High School is to create an environment, which facilitates personalized education and accommodates both departmentalized and interdisciplinary instructional approaches.
Alhambra High School, located in Phoenix, Arizona, is based on a school-within-a-school organizational model. Houses in Alhambra High Schools are comprised of regular classrooms, small group rooms, science, project lab, and teacher workroom. In addition, decentralized administrative spaces such as an assistant principal's office and an itinerant office are included in each house. The school-within-a-school model provides an opportunity for more interaction between students and administrators and between administrators and staff. The school within-a-school model also provides for the flexibility to operate as independent schools under the same roof.
Thematic teaming is based on delivering curriculum within the context of a specific theme. Themes may include Science and Math, Fine and Performing Arts, or Foreign Language and Literature.
Metro-Tech High School, a comprehensive academic and vocational high school located in Phoenix, Arizona, was renovated to incorporate a thematic organizational modej. Each house includes regular classrooms, science lab, a student production area, and a teacher workroom. Each house is specialized for one of five themes: Public Service, Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Business, and Marketing.
Implementing these organizational models, specifically the house concept, may offer significant advantages to the delivery of curriculum and observation of students. While the impact implementing the house concept as well as other models, has on facilities is continually being evaluated in terms of major systems, it typically should not outweigh the educational advantages.
TECHNOLOGY
Create Pervasive and Integrated Systems
Technology continues to evolve and influence education. Technology has traditionally been perceived as a stand-alone content area with its own dedicated spaces. "Best practices," however, may suggest that technology should be incorporated into every learning space and into all curricula. Incorporating technology can accomplish two basic goals of education: linking traditionally isolated content areas and providing teachers with tools to utilize understanding of multiple intelligences in their lessons.
Click here to view image
Howard Gardner has indicated in "Frames of Mind" that there are several different types of intelligences (linguistic, mathematical, musical, kinesthetic, spatial, intra persona I, interpersonal, and natural intelligence). Each person has strengths in some intelligences and weaknesses in others. Experts have indicated that students retain more information when several intelligences are involved in the learning process. For example, The NTL institute for Behavior Science reports that students retain only 10% of what they read, but retain 90% of what they read, see, hear, experience, and teach.
Incorporating technology into all learning spaces and into ail curricula can have a significant impact on facilities. First, all learning spaces would require access to voice, video, data ports, and electrical outlets. Second, infrastructure must be designed in such a way to allow access for maintenance and upgrades as technology continues to evolve.
Click here to view image
ADMINISTRATION
Increase Student Contact and Flexibility
As a result of recent violent crimes occurring in school facilities, school districts across the country are searching for both active and passive means of security. While not the only reason, "best practices" suggest that decentralizing administration may serve this purpose. The decentralization of administrative services may also provide the flexibility and opportunity for increased student contact, decreased student anonymity, and opportunities for passive supervision.
In addition, assistant principals, deans, and counselors form teams, are closer to the student and teacher, and can more efficiently use their time, expertise, and resources because their offices are located in the academic clusters. Communication between administrators is no longer an issue as access to instructional information and student records and maintaining a positive and secure school environment can be achieved through the effective use of technology.
Decentralizing administration affects faciiities only by the necessity to relocate offices and support spaces within each (earning community and/or other areas.
COMMUNITY USE
Instil! a Sense of Participation, Ownership, and Pride
"Best practices" suggest that facilities could serve not only as an instructional centers for students, but also as user-friendly centers of the communities. Facilities could provide programs and access to resources for adults, businesses, and other community organizations. Community/school partnerships are playing an increasing role in high school facilities. These partnerships provide students with expanded learning opportunities, professional development opportunities for staff, and a venue for community activities.
Providing access to and forming partnerships with the community can have a significant impact on facilities. Additional spaces such as parent or community volunteer rooms, community locker rooms, and storage spaces may be necessary. In addition, for security purposes, community access may require careful attention to the organization of the facility. Community accessible portions of the facility may need to be located in areas that permit the remainder of the facility to be secure before, during, and after school hours.
SUMMARY
As a result of the transition to the information age as well as the aging of facilities, school districts are investigating curricula, organizational models, current and emerging technologies, the role of administration, and their local communities to determine the effect each of these has on student performance.
The research and investigations provided within this chapter describes "best practices" that suggest the following:
* Curriculum
Offer Essential Knowledge, Integrate It, and Make Connections to Real Life
* Organizational Models
Provide Student-Centered House Approach
* Technology
Create Pervasive and Integrated System
* Administration
Increase Student Contact and Flexibility
* Community Use
Instill a Sense of Participation, Ownership, and Pride
These "best practices" are not intended to be solutions to all of the issues confronting schools. Schools may choose to utilize these "best practices" as they work as a team to discuss how best to provide educational opportunities to improve student achievement in their district
OVERVIEW
The Arkansas Department of Education - Special Education Unit complies with the Federal Regulations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the Arkansas School Facility Manual provides square footage guidelines to comply with the educational program requirements. IDEA requires a district to provide a full continuum of services in a student's neighborhood/home school to the greatest extent possible in the Least Restrictive Environment.
The Rules and Regulations Governing Special Education and Related Services: Procedural Requirements and Program Standards provide eligibility criteria for students with disabilities to meet the Least Restrictive Environment requirement for all special needs students. These criteria assist in differentiating the type and number of spaces that are needed in each school to address the facility needs for students with disabilities. As each school district is planning for specific educational program needs in their new or renovated facilities, identifying the number of students in each of these options is important to appropriately provide the unique space requirements. The terms used to establish eligibility criteria are provided as part of this document to assist in identifying all of the students who need to be considered in the facility program needs.
DEFINITION OF TERMS
The term includes schizophrenia. The term does not apply to children who are socially maladjusted, unless it is determined that they have an emotional disturbance.
"Hearing impairment" also means an impairment in hearing, whether permanent or fluctuating, that adversely affects a child's educational performance but that is not included under the definition of deafness.
AudioloQical Indicators
Disorders Not Included - The term does not include learning problems that are primarily the result of visual, hearing, or motor disabilities, of mental retardation, of emotional disturbance, or of environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.
"Speech or Language Impairment" means a communication disorder such as deviant articulation, fluency, voice, and/or comprehension and/or expression of language, spoken or written, which impedes the child's acquisition of basic cognitive and/or affective performance skills as established in the Basic Educational Skills manual developed by the Arkansas Department of Education.
Students with partial sight are those whose vision, although impaired, is still the primary channel of learning and, with adjustments, are able to perform the visual tasks required in the usual school situation. Generally, their visual acuity with correction is 20/70 or less.
Students with blindness are those with no vision or with little potential for developing vision as a primary channel for learning and, therefore, must rely upon tactile and auditory sense to obtain information.
INTRODUCTION
the current Standards for Accreditation of Public Schools require that secondary educational facilities offer a minimum of three programs of study from three different occupational areas. A list of all approved occupational areas, clusters or pathways, and programs of study is included in this manual to assist school districts, educational planners, and design professionals with anticipating space needs for these requirements.
Included below is an outline of the current workforce development programs. Each Occupational Area is organized in the following organizational structure.
OCCUPATIONAL AREAS
SPACE NEEDS
In order to meet the needs of Workforce Development programs, adequate laboratory, classroom, storage, and office space is needed. Chapter 5: Program of Requirements [Bracketing] contains a detailed list of the spaces that a District may include when designing a High School facility with Workforce Development programs.
It is important to point out that the District should determine the Occupational Areas to be delivered, the associated cluster or pathways, and the programs of study and then proceed to Chapter 5 to complete the Program of Requirement Worksheet. When completing the worksheet, the Project Team should select the laboratory space for each program of study and the related spaces such as offices, too! rooms, and storage needed to serve the laboratory space. Additional information can be found in Chapter 5.
INTRODUCTION An Educational Framework is a series of broad principles associated with organizational, facility, program, and service issues. En conjunction with the Educational Facility Planning Concepts, the Education Framework establishes the foundation on which educational facilities are designed.
The Standards & Guidelines are not intended to address every possible condition. Flexibility is required to develop appropriate solutions given the diversity of programs, community requirements, existing building conditions, site constraints, etc. found in the school district.
The following educational assumptions/concepts were derived from a wide range of sources that included representation from parents and students, teachers and school administrators, business and government [state and local] officials.
GRADE CONFIGURATION
Following are the suggested grade configurations for each level of school facility.
Pre-Kindergarten programs should be included as part of the school facility as required by state law.
Workforce Development courses are included in middle and high school facilities.
School size is based on the number of students projected to attend a particular school facility. For the number of students by grade level the Program of Requirements provides the total required school size that contains both the required spaces and a support space allowance needed to adequately meet the needs of the students.
The Program of Requirements found in Chapter 5 provides required spaces and a support space allowance for the selection of spaces needed for the various program areas found in each grade level of school.
CLASS SIZE
Class size [or Average class size] is defined as the number of students occupying a space at one time. Class size is not necessarily synonymous with student teacher ratio.
|
A. |
Pre-Kindergarten-Kindergarten |
20 students |
|
B. |
1st Grade through 3rd Grade |
25 students |
|
C. |
4th Grade through 6th Grade |
28 students |
|
D. |
7th Grade through 12th Grade |
30 students |
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
Workforce Development [WFD] refers to programs traditionally offered under the label Career Technical Education or Vocational Education.
Note: Access to a WFD occupational area can occur in the following ways:
KINDERGARTEN
Kindergarten courses will be delivered all day.
PROGRAMS
As programs and services change it is important that each school district identify the current and future educational needs of its students. Once those needs have been identified, the District should then determine the types of instructional programs that will result in a successful student. The Standards & Guidelines are based on current and future trends in education and include the following programs. As stated above, ultimately each district should determine the appropriate programs for their students.
Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to assist the school district and the Design Professional with selection, purchase, and development of a site.
Site Selection Criteria
At first look, a potential site may appear to be a good acquisition. There are many factors, however, that can distort the picture. A large site can diminish if wetlands are to be avoided or if part of the area is in a floodplain. There must be a stream or other outsource nearby to remove storm drainage. Hilly topography can escalate site development costs. Adequate space is needed to retain and release storm water from the site.
Access to and from the site which has connection to a major highway or road artery is an important factor. Aside from the surface characteristics, sub-surface conditions require exploration. Preliminary soil borings should be taken to ascertain the presence of poor soil, high water table, voids, or other impediments. A Phase I environmental study should be a requirement.
Site Design
With a good site available, site design and layout becomes the task. Good site design dictates that bus and car traffic should not cross. Likewise, students should not be required to cross car traffic lanes either entering or leaving buses. Bus parking should be arranged in a continuous line or, preferably, in a 45 degree parking arrangement.
Visitor and staff parking, as well as a separate service drive, is recommended. Event parking is difficult to provide since large events usually only occur a couple times per year.
The orientation of the building is critical from an energy usage standpoint. The majority of the windows should face a north/south direction. Easy access to the main entrance should be obvious to all.
Good site design requires careful and thorough planning to provide maximum safety, and efficient utilization of site features.
Site Size
The recommended minimum site size is consistent with current Arkansas State Board of Education standards. The site size was also based on a compilation of code requirements from cities in the Midwest and practical experience of site design. Most state education departments either mandate or recommend the minimum number of acres needed for the specific grade levels. These size guidelines are consistent with those recommended in the Council of Educational Facility Planners international (CEFPI), Guide for School Facility Appraisal.
Site Design
From past professional site design experience, sound judgment can determine if the visual survey of the site will satisfy the project needs. Useable topography, good surface drainage, available site utilities, and vehicular access are important. Soil borings must be obtained. Site design criteria are good practice recommendations, rather than standards.
Site Size
PK-12 School: 40 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students
PK-8 School: 20 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students
Urban Site Size
Urban Site Introduction
Urban Building Footprint
|
Percentage of Building Footprint to Total Area (GSF) |
|||||||
|
Building Size |
GSF |
50% |
60% |
70% |
80% |
90% |
100% |
|
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS |
|||||||
|
200 students |
34,400 |
34,400 |
|||||
|
350 students |
47,600 |
47,600 |
|||||
|
550 students |
70,400 |
49,280 |
56,320 |
||||
|
700 students |
89,600 |
62,720 |
71,680 |
||||
|
MIDDLE SCHOOLS |
|||||||
|
200 students |
32,600 |
32,600 |
|||||
|
350 students |
54,600 |
54,600 |
|||||
|
550 students |
86,350 |
60,445 |
69,080 |
||||
|
700 students |
109,200 |
65,520 |
76,440 |
||||
|
HIGH SCHOOLS |
|||||||
|
250 students |
51,750 |
51,750 |
|||||
|
500 students |
95,500 |
66,850 |
76,400 |
||||
|
1,000 students |
178,000 |
106,800 |
124,600 |
||||
|
1,500 students |
249,000 |
124,500 |
149,400 |
||||
|
2,000 students |
322,000 |
161,000 |
193,200 |
||||
Urban Parking
Click here to view image
Note 1: Teaching stations are determined at a percentage of 1 per 25 students.
Note 2: Teachers are calculated at the following utilization of teaching stations:
Elementary 100%; Middle-85%; High School-85%.
Calculation: Teaching Station/Utilization percentage = Number of Teachers (247.85 = 29)
Note 3: Ancillary staff includes teaching aides, media center specialist, special education staff, etc. Total is calculated as percentage of the student population as follows: Elementary-2%; Middle-2%; High-1%.
Note 4: Administration includes principals, secretarial, and itinerant staff.
Note 5: Custodial/maintenance staff includes full-time staff for regular school hours.
Calculation: 1 staff per 150 students.
Note 6: Food service staff is calculated at 1 staff per 100 meals served with 80% building capacity participation for a full-service kitchen. Satellite kitchen would reduce staff by approximately 50-75%.
Note 7: Visitor parking is calculated at 2% of building student capacity.
Note 8: Student parking is calculated at 20% of all High School students.
Note 9: Minimum required parking is determined by the total of staff, visitor, and student parking or by required zoning.
Urban Elementary School - 350 students
|
Building Footprint (One-Story) |
47,600 SF |
1.09 acres |
|
PK-2/3-5 Playgrounds (see Note 1) |
17,500 SF |
0.40 acre |
|
Parking and Drives (see Note 2) |
15,200 SF |
0.35 acre |
|
Play Fields (see Note 3): |
96,840 SF |
2.22 acres |
|
one multipurpose field (360'x250') one softball field (200' outfield) one basketball court |
||
|
Subtotal: |
177,140 SF |
4.06 acres |
|
Add 20% Greenspace (see Note 4) |
35.428 SF |
0.81 acre |
|
TOTAL: |
212,568 SF |
4.88 acres |
|
Recommended site size: |
5.25 acres |
Note 1: This space footage, based on 50 SF per student, allows for a hard surface play area and a soft surface play equipment area for each playground.
Note 2: This estimate of area, based on 400 SF per car, allows for drives, a drop-off/
pick-up zone, and a service area drive.
Note 3: Softball fields may partially overlap multipurpose field.
Note 4: Setting aside 20% of the site square footage requirements as greenspace ensures adequate space for separation of the various elements located on each site. Site landscaping is included in this area.
Urban Middle School - 550 students
|
Building Footprint (Two-Story) |
69,080 SF |
1.59 acres |
|
Parking and Drives (see Note 1) |
26,000 SF |
0.60 acre |
|
Play Fields (see Note 2): |
400.264 SF |
9.19 acres |
|
one six-lane running track one soccer/football and event field in track interior one baseball field (350' outfield) two softball fields (200' outfield) two basketball courts |
||
|
Subtotal: |
495,344 SF |
11.38 acres |
|
Add 25% Greenspace (see Note 3) |
123.836 SF |
2.84 acres |
|
TOTAL: |
619,180 SF |
14.22 acres |
|
Recommended site size; |
14.50 acres |
Note 1: This estimate of area, based on 400 SF per car, allows for drives, a drop-off/ pick-up zone, and a service area drive.
Note 2: Pole vault is not included at track.
Note 3: Setting aside 25% of the site square footage requirements as greenspace ensures adequate space for separation of the various elements located on each site. Site landscaping is included in this area.
Urban High School -1,000 students
|
Building Footprint |
106,800 SF |
2.45 acres |
|
Parking and Drives (see Note 1) |
124,400 SF |
2.86 acres |
|
Play Fields (see Note 2): |
797,090 SF |
18.30 acres |
|
one eight-lane running track one soccer/football and event field in track interior one practice football field one practice soccer field two baseball fields (350' outfield) two softball fields (250' outfield) ten tennis courts four basketball courts |
||
|
Subtotal: |
1,028,290 SF |
23.61 acres |
|
Add 30% Greenspace (see Note 3) |
308.487 SF |
7.08 acres |
|
TOTAL: |
1,336,777 SF |
30.69 acres |
|
Recommended site size: |
31.00 acres |
Note 1: This estimate of area, based on 400 SF per car, allows for drives, a drop-off/
pick-up zone, and a service area drive.
Note 2: Pole vault is not included at track.
Note 3: Setting aside 30% of the site square footage requirements as greenspace ensures adequate space for separation of the various elements located on each site. Site landscaping is included in this area.
Outdoor Athletic and Recreation Fields
Baseball: Based on 350' radius to centerfield and 300' radius to right and left outfield with 60' offset from baseline to sideline fence.
|
135,806 SF |
3.12 acres |
|
|
Softball: |
||
|
One field with outfield overlapping multi-purpose field |
||
|
(includes 360' x 195' multipurpose field) |
91,200 SF |
2.09 acres |
|
One field - no overlap |
53,824 SF |
1.24 acres |
|
Soccer/multiourDose field: |
7 0,200 SF |
1.61 acres |
|
Track and field events: |
||
|
6-lane track, with interior field {no events) |
||
|
146,000 SF |
3.35 acres |
|
|
6-lane track, with interior field and discus/shot-put commbo: |
||
|
1 73,222 SF |
3.98 acres |
|
|
8-lane track, with interior field & events |
||
|
187,500 SF |
4.30 acres |
|
|
Tennis: 10 courts |
66,530 SF |
1.53 acres |
|
4 courts |
24,480 SF |
0.56 acre |
Basketball: Courts are 84' x 50'. Courts in quantity of 1-2 have 5' surrounding and between courts. Courts in quantity of 3 and up have 10' on ends and 5' to sides and between courts.
|
1 court |
5,640 SF |
0.13 acre |
|
2 courts |
10,810 SF |
0.25 acre |
|
3 courts |
23,400 SF |
0.54 acre |
|
4 courts |
34,840 SF |
0.80 acre |
General
Aside from site size described in Chapter 4, the following are factors to be considered for judging the merits of a potential site.
Topography
Vehicular Access
Soli Characteristics
Site Utilities
Site Preparation
Codes and Zoning
Adjacent Property Facilities
Easements and Rights-of-Way
Environmental Restrictions
Testing
Aesthetic Consideration
Vehicular Circulation
Pedestrian Circulation
Storm Sewer System
Detention Pond
Sanitary / Sewerage
Directional Signage
Playgrounds
Lighting
Landscaping
Positive Drainage
Purpose
The information in this chapter consists of a diagram, features, ioose furnishings, finishes, and notes which is referred to as a "space plate". There is a space plate for each room in each program area in each school level. The purpose is to provide the Design Professionals and School Districts with guidelines to condition, finish, and equip each space.
Description
The diagram is not intended to fix the size or shape of that room. The size of each space is stated in the bracketing chapter (chapter 5). Features noted are desirable, but quantities must be determined in relation to the size and capacity stated in the bracketing section. In some cases, casework can be fixed or moveable. Loose furnishings are normally furniture items needed to complete the space.
Each room has a unique code that appears in the bracketing section and on the space plate. Example: E-AC-1 (E = elementary, AC = academic core, 1 = space plate #1)
Finishes are suggested options from life-cycle cost analysis that resulted in economical, durable, and maintainable finishes. Refer to material standards and guidelines in Chapter 7.
Plumbing, HVAC, and electrical provisions must first of all conform to all appropriate building and energy codes. In addition to the notes on each space plate, Design Professionals should provide good design recommendations that enhance code requirements where possible.
Technology is a vital part of teaching programs. Careful programming and early infrastructure inclusion in the design of the facility is recommended.
Purpose
The intent of Chapter 7 is to provide standards and guidelines necessary to plan, design and construct school facilities throughout the state of Arkansas. The focus is on building systems and materials that will provide buildings that are economical and reflect quality construction, along with mandatory performance standards, additional options and available choices. All items and systems, such as loose furnishings, casework, technology, etc., should be integrated early in the planning phase of the project.
Definitions
The planning and design of school facilities shall be based upon criteria described in Chapter 7 in accordance with the following definitions:
"Standards in bold" - Performance or construction required items for which there is mandatory adherence.
"Guidelines" - Performance or construction items which are recommended, but NOT required.
"Examples" - Typical component(s) of standards or guidelines.
Codes and Standards
Applicable local, state, and international building codes and standards are not repeated in this chapter. It is the responsibifity of the Design Professionals to conform to the current codes in their design process. Should the standards contained in this manual be in conflict with international, state, or local codes, the established codes shall prevail. The requirements of ADAAG (Americans with Disabilities Act) should be consulted.
No attempt has been made to provide detailed specifications in Chapter 7. Standards and guidelines are available that allow architects and engineers the flexibility to design to fit the school district needs.
Applicability
The construction and performance standards and guidelines contained herein are applicable to both new construction of public school facilities and renovation of existing public school facilities. Every attempt should be made to apply these standards and guidelines to existing buildings, in gradual steps as funding and other influences allow, {refer to Chapter 1 It may be recognized that some standards may not be compatible with existing facilities in renovation projects nor may it be possible to completely conform a performance or construction standard to new a new facility. It those instances variances to those standards, upon request, may be granted by the Division.
Green Building Design (optional)
A strong motive of these building systems standards and guidelines is to promote high performance schools. High performance schools are healthy, comfortable, energy efficient, resource efficient, water efficient, safe, secure, adaptable, and easy to operate and maintain. Designing for high performance goals is a guideline. It is to be considered, but not mandatory.
Commissioning (optional)
The commissioning process is a single-point responsibility to make sure that certain systems in a building are functioning and performing according to the design intent. The independent Commissioning Agent goes far beyond the occasional Design Professional job visits during the construction period. Actual tests are performed and components are verified under the guidance of the Commissioning Agent. Several systems can be commissioned, but emphasis in the chapter is to commission thef HVAC components.
Definition
Commissioning is the process of ensuring that systems are designed, installed, functionally tested, and capable of being operated and maintained according to the Owner's operational needs.
Application
Commissioning may be applicable to both new facilities and renovation. It is a guideline to be considered, but not mandatory.
Commissioning Authority (CA)
The CA is in charge of the commissioning process and is an objective, independent advocate of the Owner.
Commissioning Authority Options
CA can be selected from an independent third party; a mechanical or installing contractor; or a design professional.
Contractor: Desirable when building is small and contractor performs ali mechanical work, but a conflict of interest can arise.
Design Professional: Good idea provided that the project specifications detail the requirements. Already familiar with the design intent but may not have day-to-day experience in the process.
How To Select
Use competitive Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and follow a qualification based selection process (QBS).
CA Qualifications
Experience required:
* Designing, specifying, or installing educational building mechanical control systems or general HVAC systems
* Working with project teams and conducting "scoping meetings"
* Building systems start-up, balancing, testing, and troubleshooting
* Commissioning at least two projects involving HVAC and lighting controls
* Writing functional performance-test plans for at least two projects.
Extent of Commissioning
The degree or extent of commissioning for new buildings is recommended for the planning, design, and construction phases. However, involvement can occur only in design, construction, or post-construction phases.
What to Commission
All projects that include controls, EMCS, pneumatic equipment, integrated systems, HVAC-refated equipment, and air distribution systems should be commissioned.
Benefits
* Improved performance of building equipment and building systems interactions
* Improved fAQ occupant comfort and productivity
* Decreased potential for building Owner liability'related to IAQ ' [DOT] Reduced operation and maintenance costs '
* Maximize energy efficiency
* Provide training for school personnel
Green Building Design (optional)
The term "green building" is synonymous with "high-performance building", "sustainable design and construction", as well as other terms that refer to a holistic approach to design and construction. Green building design strives to balance environmental responsibility, resource efficiency, occupant comfort and well-being, and community sensitivity. Green building design includes all players in an integrated development process, from the design team (building owners, architects, engineers, and consultants), to the construction team {materials manufacturers, contractors, and waste haulers), to the maintenance staff and building occupants. The green building process results in a high-quality product that maximizes the owner's return on investment.
Why Design Green?
The building sector has a tremendous impact on the environment. According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), buildings in the United States consume more than 30% of our total energy and 60% of our electricity annually. Buildings are a major source of pollutants that cause urban air quality problems and contribute to climate change. Buildings produce 35% of the country's carbon dioxide emissions. Green building practices can substantially reduce the negative environmental impacts associated with these buildings and reverse the trend of unsustainable construction activities. Green design also reduces operating costs, enhances building marketability, potentially increases occupant productivity, and helps create a sustainable community. Green design has environmental, economic, and social elements that benefit all stakeholders, including owners, occupants, and the general public.
Creating High Performance Schools (optional)
School districts around the country are finding that smart energy choices can help them save money and provide healthier, more effective learning environments. By incorporating energy improvements into their construction or renovation plans, school can significantly reduce energy consumption and costs. These savings can then be redirected to educational needs such as additional teachers, instructional materials, or new computers.
Establishing High Performance Goals
Cost-effective energy- and resource-efficient schools start with good planning. Working closely with the school's design and planning staff, the architects and engineers should develop objectives that reflect local conditions and priorities, balance short-term needs and long-term savings, and address environmental issues. Goals can include reducing operating costs; designing building that teach; improving academic performance; protecting the environment; increasing health, safety, and comfort; supporting community values; and considering emerging solutions.
Establishing day lighting objectives will also improve classroom conditions and can help improve performance if you:
Green Building Rating System (optional)
The Green Building Initiative design program called Green Globes and the program offered by the U.S. Green Building council, LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), are green measurement systems designed for rating commercial and institutional buildings. Both address new construction and major renovations. The programs address various environmental categories, typically sustainable sites, water efficiency, energy, indoor environmental quality, and materials and resources. Both are performance oriented systems where points are earned for satisfying performance criteria. Different levels of green building certification are awarded based on the total points earned.
Application
Green building design may be applicable to both new facilities and renovation. It is a guideline to be considered, but not mandatory.
Components
Standards
otherwise approved by an independent testing agency.
Guidelines
Examples
Standards
Examples
NOTE: Other types of exterior wall construction may be acceptable if type meets or exceeds the above performance standards criteria. Construction standards following, indicated in bold type, are to be considered mandatory minimum requirements. More stringent requirements shall be used when required by the current state building codes and fire prevention codes.
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Purpose
Examples
NOTE:
#1: Other types of roof systems may be acceptable if system meets or exceeds the performance standards listed below.
#2: All roof system and products shall be designed in accordance with state fire prevention code and state building code.
Performance Standards
Components
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Components
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Guidelines
Components
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Components
Constructions Standards
Performance Standards
Components
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Components
Construction Standards
Performance Standards
Performance Guidelines
Examples
Components
Construction Standards
Performance Standards
Guidelines
Examples
Examples
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Performance Standards
Examples
* Resilient
* Carpeting
* Rubber
* Tile
* Terrazzo
* Concrete
* Wood
* Resilient
* Rubber
* Resinous
* Hardwood
Construction Guidelines
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Performance Guidelines
Examples
Examples
Construction Guidelines
Examples
Construction Guidelines
Performance Standards
The K-12 school environment requires special needs for equipment and furnishings. These items must be strong and sturdy to last many decades. Manufacturers must specialize in these areas to meet the broad age range of students. Safety of their products is essential and they must meet standards, codes, and accessibility guidelines.
With casework, environmentally preferable product alternates should be utilized, such as oriented strand board and recycled plastic. Equipment and furnishings must be as maintenance-free as possible and easily cleaned.
Examples
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Guidelines
General Guidelines
Site Design Parameters Guidelines
Valving Standards
Hangers Standards
Identification Guidelines
Testing Guidelines
Potable Water System Standards
Domestic Water Heater System Standards
Water Conditioning and Softening Systems Guidelines
Sanitary Piping System Standards
Gas Piping Systems Standards
Roof Drain and Storm Sewer Systems Standards
Plumbing Systems for Food Service Areas Standards
Building Fire Protection Systems Standards
Plumbing Fixtures and Specialties Standards
General Standards
System Selection Life Cycle Cost Analysis Guidelines
Outdoor Air Design Values Guidelines
Indoor Air Design Values Guidelines
Outdoor Air Ventilation Requirements Standards
Temperature Control Systems
Interior and Exterior Noise Control Guidelines
Equipment Accessibility Standard
Closeout Documents Guidelines
Physical Education and Indoor Practice Facility Guidelines
Energy Usage Standards
Electrical Distribution Standards
efficient type.
Independent, separate raceway, wiring, and transfer switches shall be provided for emergency life safety systems and non-emergency life safety systems.
Lighting Standards
Where the total emergency power load exceeds 8 kW, emergency power shall be delivered by on-site, standby power generator. Generators rated 150 kW and below shall use gaseous fuel (if available, large units shall be diesel).
Wiring Devices Standards
Fire Alarm System Standards
Security Systems Standards
Lightning Protection Standards
Technology Electrical Standards
Telecommunications Grounding Standards
Intercom / Bell Systems Guidelines
SCHOOL LIGHTING LEVELS - 2004
|
ROOM TYPE CLASSIFICATION |
2000 IES FOOTCANDLES |
RECOMMENDED DESIGN FOOTCANDLES DIRECT LIGHTING(1) |
RECOMMENDED DESIGN FOOTCANDLES INDIRECT LIGHTING |
|
ADMINISTRATIVE |
|||
|
Offices/Receptionist |
50 |
50 |
40 |
|
Storage Rooms |
- |
25 |
25 |
|
Restrooms |
5 |
25-30 |
25-30 |
|
Conference/Resource Rooms |
30-100 |
50 |
40 |
|
Health Clinic |
50 |
50 |
40 |
|
Teacher Prep/Workroom |
50 |
50 |
40 |
|
CLASSROOMS-GENERAL |
30 |
50 |
40 |
|
Art Rooms/Kiln |
50 |
50 |
40 |
|
Modular Technology Labs |
- |
50 |
40 |
|
CADD Labs |
30 |
30 |
30 |
|
Industrial Tech/Production Labs |
100 |
60 |
60 |
|
Computer Labs |
30 |
40 |
40 |
|
Graphics Labs |
30-100 |
50 |
40 |
|
Life Skills Labs |
50 |
50 |
50 |
|
Science Labs |
50 |
50 |
50 |
|
Laundry Rooms |
- |
25 |
25 |
|
Music Rooms |
30-50 |
50 |
40 |
|
Large Group instruction Rooms |
30 |
50 |
40 |
|
MEDIA CENTER |
- |
50 |
40 |
|
Active Areas |
30 vertical |
50 |
40 |
|
Inactive Areas |
5 vertical |
40 |
40 |
|
ATHLETIC AREAS |
|||
|
Gymnasium - Elementary School |
100 |
50 |
- |
|
Gymnasium - Middle School |
100 |
50 |
- |
|
Gymnasium - High School |
100 |
60 |
- |
|
Multi-use P.E. Rooms |
- |
50 |
- |
|
Locker Rooms |
10 |
25 |
25 |
|
STUDENT DINING |
|||
|
Assembly |
10-20 |
20 |
- |
|
Stage/Work Lights |
30 |
20 |
- |
|
Make-up/Dressing Rooms |
30-50 |
50 |
- |
|
Theatrical Control Room |
10-30 |
30 |
- |
|
Equipment room with dimmable incandescent lighting offering 10 foot-candles of illumination. |
|||
|
STUDENT DINING |
10-50 |
50 |
40 |
|
Cooking |
50 |
75-80 (2) |
- |
|
Food Preparation |
50 |
75-80 (2) |
- |
|
Serving Line |
50 |
75-80 (2) |
- |
|
Ware Washing |
10 |
75-80 (2) |
- |
|
CUSTODIAL CLOSETS |
10-30 |
20-30 |
- |
|
ELECTRICAL ROOMS |
30 |
20-30 |
- |
|
MECHANICAL ROOMS |
30 |
30 |
- |
|
PARKING AREA |
.2 |
1(3) |
- |
|
DRIVEWAYS |
.3 |
.5(3) |
- |
|
CIRCULATION AREAS |
|||
|
Building Entries |
5 |
5-10(3) |
- |
|
Corridors |
5 |
20 |
20 |
|
Corridors with Lockers |
5 |
20 |
20 |
|
Stairways |
5 |
20 |
20 |
|
(1) Maintenance factor 70% LL/SF = Lamp Lumens per square foot |
|||
|
(2) Foot-candles shall comply with local health department regulations |
|||
|
(3) Foot-candles shall conform to page 4200-6 |
|||
Outlet Locations
|
ELECTRICAL OUTLET DEVICE TYPE |
Masonry Wall, Base (Starter) Course Heiqht 4 inch | 8 inch Mounting Height Above Floor to Bottom of Outlet (Device) Box |
|
|
Receptacle outlets, microphone outlets (jacks), equipment outlets flacks), television outlets flacks), portable telephone outlets, computer outlets, etc. * General throughout * Mechanical equipment rooms * Above counter tops 30"H 36"H 48"H * Above backsplash top * Above radiators * Above or adjacent to lavatories * Behind domestic refrigerators * Behind domestic washers and dryers * Serving domestic dishwashers * Wall-mounted telephone outlets * Telephone/video control |
18" 52" 36" 44" 52" 2" minimum 6" minimum 44" 52" 36" 2" 44" 44" |
18" 48" 40" 48" 56" 2" minimum 6" minimum 48" 56" 32" 2" 48" 48" |
|
Toqgie switches |
48" |
48" |
|
Recessed motor controllers |
60" |
56" |
|
Electric panels, terminal.cabinets, etc., to center of tub or box |
50" |
48" |
|
Clocks |
Near ceiling |
Near ceiling |
|
Pull stations (fire alarm) |
44" |
44" |
|
Volume controls, call-in switches, doorbell buttons |
44" |
44" |
|
Horn/strobes (fire alarm) |
80" |
80" |
Genera! Guidelines
Backbones
Wiring Standards
Telecommunication Room Wiring Guidelines '
Telecommunication Room Wiring Standards: Interior Environment
Telecommunication Room Terminations
Building Wiring Guidelines
Telephone System Standards
A school telephone system shall be as follows:
Telephone System Guidelines
Video Distribution System Standards
Data / Computer Network System Standards
Central Sound System / Public Address System Standards
Gymnasium Sound Reinforcement System Guidelines
High School Student Dining Area Sound Reinforcement System Guidelines
Student Dining Sound Reinforcement System Guidelines (Cafetoriums only)
Music Room Sound Reinforcement System Guidelines
Security Systems Guidelines (optional)
Interactive Classroom Design Guidelines (optional)
Videoconferencing classrooms require special attention to ensure that the highest quality sound and visual signals are transmitted and received by participants. The following are recommendations on the building of interactive videoconferencing rooms.
ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS (POR) SUMMARY AND REQUIRED SPACES
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
SUITABILITY ANALYSIS
Click here to view image
ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL
PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS
SCHOOL SUPPORT SPACES (NOT REQUIRED)
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL
PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT (Required for 9-12)
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL
PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS
REQUIRED SPACES NOTES
Click here to view image
APPENDIX "C"
ACADEMIC FACILITIES PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
September 2011
PROJECT AGREEMENT
(Applicable beginning with Partnership Projects for 2013-2015 Biennium)
Project Name: Click to enter Project Name.
Project Number: Click to enter Project Number
This Project Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the Divisionof Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation ("Division ") and the Click to enter District Name School District ("District"), Click to enter County. County, pursuant to A.C.A. § 6-20-2507.
WHEREAS, The Division, created pursuant to Act 1327 of 2005 is a body corporate and politic, an agency of state government and an instrumentality of the State of Arkansas ("State "), performing essential government functions of the State; and
WHEREAS, the District is acting as an agency of state government, performing essential functions of government pursuant to the laws of the State of Arkansas, and
WHEREAS, the District and the Division have approved a Master Facilities Plan describing the classroom facilities needs of the entire student population of the district, and the total budget for the Public School Academic Facilities Project ("Project");and
WHEREAS,the District and the Division acknowledge that for funding and planning purposes, the Project is anticipated to commence on Click to enter Date. and be completed on Click to enter Date..
NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the District and the Division agree to cooperate in the design, construction and terms described herein and as follows.
This Project Agreement ("Agreement") will become effective upon the signing of both parties and be binding on the date signed by the Director of the Division of Public School Academic Facilities. The district certifies that scope planning and financial planning have been completed prior to the project application submission. No additional aspect of the project will proceed prior to the signing of this agreement. By signing, the district certifies that it has not begun the project beyond the steps outlined above. The signing of this agreement certifies that the Commission for Arkansas Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation ("Commission") has approved the project and funding under the Academic Facilities Partnership Program. The district further acknowledges by signing that, should it be determined that the Project began prior to the signing of this agreement, the Commission may exercise one of the following options:
Furthermore, if construction of the project has not commenced by (enter date 18 months from Commission approval)Click to enter Date, this agreement is null and void and any monies paid by the state to a district shall be subject to immediate recapture by the state. The parties agree to exercise good faith in the execution of this agreement and the completion of the requirements set forth herein, and that both parties will endeavor to follow and implement the aspects of the program, the district agrees to comply with all timelines and process requirements in the Rules Governing the Partnership Program or be subject to those Commission options referenced above.
If this is a warm, safe and dry project, give complete description of the system, or systems, being replaced in the detailed scopes of steps 3 and 4.
(Do not attach the application as the scope)
(Do not attach the application as the scope) b.Funded project square feet or appropriate unit: Click to enter Funded Size.
State financial participation of the total Project budget shall be: $Click to enter State Participation..
State "green building incentive": $Click to enter Green Building Incentive..
Total state financial participation: $Click to enter Total State Financial Participation..
The District's local share of the total Project budget shall be $Click to enter Districts Local Share of Project, forth in Article IV of this Agreement.
The division and district shall be responsible for the following:
|
School District |
Division |
|
Determination of project Scope (Partnership Project Application) |
Review and approval (application review) |
|
Architect/Engineer, Construction Manager (if desired), Construction Contractor selection process |
Provide guidance as requested pertaining to procurement laws |
|
Submittal of project construction drawings in PDF format and full size printed copy (preliminary floor plans for space projects recommended for preliminary review) |
Review for conformance with facility manual |
|
Site selection and request |
Provide recommended guidelines contained in the Arkansas Facility Manual |
|
Request for variance consideration of the Arkansas Facility Manual |
Division plan review and variance determination |
|
Educational program choices, |
Approval in accordance with design and material choices with current state law and Arkansas Facility Manual |
|
Recommend special conditions documents |
Provide recommended contract clauses for architect and construction contracts |
|
Bid procedures |
No action |
|
Submission of project approval forms and state reviews |
Final project approval |
|
Recommendation of award, notification of bids |
No action |
|
Fund management in accordance with Arkansas Department of Education accounting guidelines |
Audit option |
|
Provide Maintenance Plan/Certification |
Verify new buildings are in the MAPPS database and the computerized maintenance management system. |
(To include letters of credit, moneys donated or contributions spent directly by a third party.)
(Specify origin of Grant and any special conditions that might affect this Project as a result of the grant award.)
No Fund moneys shall be spent for any items inconsistent with the provisions of the Arkansas School Facility Manual and Division policies, unless a variance is approved by the Division.
Upon completion of the project, the district will create the preventative maintenance schedules of any new space facility is included in the District's overall maintenance plan contained in the district's computerized maintenance management system as required by the Academic Facilities Master Plan prior to final payment by the Division.
In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date(s) set forth below.
Click here to view image
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF APPENDIX B:
Appendix B: (Part 1), will be submitted initially with the Agreement when forwarded to the Division. It will indicate the elements of the budget amounts for all expected expenditures. It is intended to be a 1 time submittal but may be updated as if new requirements of expense are identified.
Appendix B: (Part 2) will be submitted with each payment request to the state. It will indicate the areas noted and will be accompanied by contract invoices.
Appendix B: (Part 3) will be submitted with each State Payment Request, if required, to provide the change order information.
Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation APPENDIX B (Parti) Budget
Click here to view image
Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation APPENDIX B (Part 2) State Payment Request
Click here to view image
Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation APPENDIX B (Part 3) Change Order {CIO) Report
Click here to view image
Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation APPENDIX B (Part 3) Change Order {CIO) Report - Page 2
Click here to view image
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
When a school district is proposing a new construction project on an existing campus with existing educational facilities, the district shall submit a POR of the existing campus and the Division shall compare the appropriate existing total gross square footage space of the existing facility on the campus to the total gross square footage space requirements of the POR for the proposed new school facility based on the projected student enrollment by grade level. After making the comparison, the school will only be deemed to not be suitable and thus eligible for state financial participation on a proposed facility project for the additional gross square footage space required in the POR not currently available on the school campus (based on the Division's campus reports or other confirmed information made available to the Division) or on other campuses affected by grade reconfigurations as part of the project. The district shall submit PORs for all campuses and grades affected by the grade reconfigurations which are a part of the project. However, the state recognizes that four particular space areas existing in school districts on or before 2008 may skew the comparison of existing space to that of the required POR space. Therefore, the Division will not count as existing space that total gross footage area above the required POR standard for the following four areas that existed on or before 2008: Physical Education, Media Center, Student Dining and Performing Arts.
When a school district is proposing a new construction project on a school campus for which the Division determines there are no other currently existing appropriate school facilities or the district is seeking a separate LEA number for the new academic facility, the district shall submit a POR for the new school campus and the Division shall compare the total gross square footage required by the POR for the proposed facility for the appropriate student grade population to that currently existing total gross square footage available in the district (based on the Division's campus and district reports or other confirmed information made available to the Division) for the appropriate student grade population in their final grade configuration less the gross square footage to be demolished as part of the proposed project. The Division shall also include other campuses and grades affected by grade reconfigurations as part of the project. The district shall submit PORs for all campuses and grades affected by the grade reconfigurations which are a part of the project. After making the comparison the school will only be deemed to not be suitable and thus eligible for state financial participation on a proposed facility project for that additional space required in the POR not currently available in the school district for the appropriate student population in their final grade reconfiguration. The State recognizes that four particular space areas existing in the school district may skew the comparison as mentioned above in Section 3.34.1 of these Rules in the "on an existing campus" comparison. As a result, the Division will give the same consideration and not count as existing space that total gross footage area above the required POR standard already existing in the district on or before 2008.
* Warm, safe, and dry;
* New facilities;
* Add-ons and/or Conversions; and
* Consolidation/annexation projects.
If the state provides financial participation for an add-on or conversion project, or a consolidation/annexation project that adds space to an existing campus, the district must construct any missing component to the POR specification. The district will have to submit a POR showing a component contained in the POR it does not have and add it, in the following order:
* Academic Core Areas;
* Special Education;
* Student Dining;
* Administrative
The state will not participate in add-on projects concerning gymnasiums, media centers and/or auditoriums if the district already has this space or is in need (according to the POR) of Academic Core Areas, Special Education or Student Dining Areas.
The state will consider the replacement of demolished space to be a prudent and resourceful expenditure of state funds issue. School districts are encouraged to discuss such issues with the state before entering into demolition projects when the districts will be filing applications for state partnership assistance.
School districts applying for state financial participation for projects that support their Facilities Master Plan shall file applications (and approved PORs and schematic drawings) in a format prescribed by the Division and shall list the applications in the district's Facilities Master Plan. No project shall be considered for state financial partnership participation unless it is included in the district's Facilities Master Plan.
First, the Division shall numerically rank all school projects based on the Facilities Wealth Index of the school district. The districts with the least Wealth Index shall be ranked first with the districts with the greater Wealth Index numerically ranked last.
Second, the Division shall numerically rank all school projects based on the third-quarter average daily membership (ADM) of the school district for the school year in which the application for state partnership assistance is filed. The districts with the least ADM shall be ranked first with the districts with the greater ADM numerically ranked last.
Third, the Division shall average the numerical ADM and Wealth Index ranking of each school's project. Once each project is averaged, the Division shall establish a ranked order with the projects with the lowest average score being ranked first and the projects with the highest average score being ranked last.
Warm, safe, and dry (systems) projects shall receive ranking of first order prior to any other partnership project only to the extent that the total state financial participation in all warm, safe, and dry (systems) projects does not exceed $10 million in the aggregate for each year of the Project Funding Cycle, or $20 million in the aggregate for the Project Funding Cycle. All otherwise eligible warm, safe, and dry (systems) projects that, because of their ranking, are beyond the aggregate statewide $10 million limitation, will not be funded.
For the 2015-2017 and 2017-2019 project funding cycles, all new facilities, add-ons, and conversion partnership projects which are approved by the Commission because a school district or campus is currently deemed not suitable shall be ranked and, thus, entitled to receive state partnership assistance in a ranking of second order prior to any other partnership project according to the following procedure of ranked order, subject to the availability of funds:
The Division shall numerically rank all new facilities, add-ons, and conversion projects based on a ten (10) year actual growth of student population review with the districts with the greatest percentage of growth being ranked first and districts with the least percentage of student growth ranked last. The growth is measured by showing (on a percentage basis) the student population growth when comparing the three quarter average daily membership of the district ten (10) years ago to the district's three quarter average daily membership in the previously completed school year. If a district has not been in existence for at least ten (10) school years as a result of the annexation or consolidation of other districts into it or with it, then for any years within the last ten (10) years for which the district was not in existence its three quarter average daily membership shall be the sum of the three quarter average daily membership of those former school districts that now comprise the school district applying for state financial participation.
Conversion projects will be reviewed against POR requirements to determine compliance with the POR. If the Division determines that the project qualifies for state financial participation, then the project will be subject to the conditions set forth in Sections 4.00 and 5.00 of these Rules. After the 2017-2019 project funding cycle, projects in this Section shall be entitled to receive state partnership assistance in a ranking of first priority order.
For the 2015-2017 and 2017-2019 project funding cycles, all warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) new construction projects for which the Commission determines that a school district is currently not in suitable condition shall be entitled to receive state partnership assistance in a ranking of third order prior to any other partnership project according to the following procedure of ranked order, subject to the availability of funds. To the extent there is limited funding available, the warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) projects shall be prioritized according to the school district's Wealth Index and the campus or campuses value (depending upon the type of project for which the district applies for state partnership assistance).
First, the Division shall numerically rank all warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) projects based on the campus (or campuses) value depending on what type of project is proposed. The projects with the lowest campus value shall be ranked first and in ascending order to the projects with the greatest campus value.
Second, the Division shall numerically rank all warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) projects based on the Facilities Wealth Index of the school district. The districts with the least Wealth Index shall be ranked first with the districts with the greater Wealth Index numerically ranked last.
Third, the Division shall average the campus value and Wealth Index ranking of each school's warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) project. Once each project is averaged, the Division shall establish a ranked order with the projects with the lowest average score being ranked first and the projects with the highest average score being ranked last.
Any project for which the Commission determines the district or campus is currently suitable shall not be entitled for any state partnership assistance in that year's partnership cycle.
The suitability analysis and determination of warm, safe, and dry (Space Replacement) projects shall be performed as per Section 3.34.
After the 2017-2019 project funding cycle, projects in this Section shall be entitled to receive state partnership assistance in a ranking of second priority order.
All projects that fall within the definition of "consolidation/annexation project" listed in Section 3.11 above and that meet all of the requirements of this Section shall be entitled to apply for state Partnership assistance. To the extent that funding is available, consolidation/annexation projects shall be evaluated and funded based upon the following criteria:
Growth: Index: For those projects meeting the definition of a "consolidation/annexation" project and which comply with the requirements of this Section, the Division will numerically rank the consolidated/annexed school district's growth index at the greater of the following two levels:
The Division's notice of its decision on a school district's application for state financial participation in a new construction project shall include an explanation of the evaluation factors underlying the decision of the Division to provide or not provide state financial participation in support of the new construction project.
Construction of the project, as evidenced by a signed construction contract, must begin within eighteen (18) months from the date of the final approval of the project by the Commission. The district must obtain the Division's approval of the completion of all district project requirements within four (4) years from the date of final approval of the project by the Commission. For the purposes of this subsection, the phrase "signed construction contract" includes construction management contracts.
A district may request a waiver of timelines in Section 7.07 of these Rules if the district believes it can show unusual and limited circumstances which prevent it from meeting the timelines. State financial participation in a district's project is contingent upon the district meeting all timelines and deadlines set forth in these Rules. Absent an approved appeal or waiver, the Division may render the state's financial participation in a district's project null and void in whole or in part for failure to meet all of the timelines and deadlines set forth in these Rules and may recapture any state partnership funding assistance funds already paid to the district.
APPENDIX "A"
INTRODUCTION
The Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) is charged with overseeing the design and construction of school facilities in the state of Arkansas. The Arkansas School Facility Manual has been developed to provide consistent, clear information for school districts and design professionals as a new generation of schools is being created for Arkansas. The Standards & Guidelines contained within this section are the culmination of standards, accepted procedures, statutory requirements, and the experience of experts and authorities throughout the United States and establish a uniform level of quality for all public school buildings. The Standards & Guidelines will apply to new school facilities and new additions to existing buildings. Renovation to existing facilities should adhere to the Standards & Guidelines as outlined in Section 1200.
Since the Standards & Guidelines must communicate information about so many issues, the length and quantity of the document can be intimidating. However, understanding how the Standards & Guidelines is organized and which information will be needed during the various phases of the process will enable each participant to be better prepared for the exciting opportunity of creating school facilities.
An important consideration in developing a state-wide program that must provide equity among districts is the balance between broadly applicable standards and program delivery. A fundamental tenet of educational facility planning is that school facilities must be responsive to a school district's educational program. The Standards & Guidelines allows districts to develop building programs that respond to their current, unique needs as well as prepare for their educational future. There are also many different ways in which districts are delivering educational programs and helping students accomplish learning objectives at every school and school level. By designing classrooms and other instructional spaces to be flexible and adaptable, individual districts are better prepared to accommodate future educational program developments.
Throughout the planning, design, and construction phases of a project there are three factors that must be considered and held in balance: quality, cost, and time (schedule). The Standards & Guidelines was created to provide parameters for bafancing these three essential elements fairly for all projects throughout the state.
The Standards & Guidelines are intended as a starting point for architects, engineers, other design professionals, and school districts to develop solutions to meet the needs of the individual school community. The information is provided to allow the planning, design, and construction process to proceed most efficiently, without undo restriction on the design of the facilities, focusing efforts on the creation of best possible school facilities for each project rather than "reinventing the wheel".
The Arkansas School Facility Manual is the exclusive property of the Arkansas Department of Education of the State of Arkansas, and the Arkansas Department of Education reserves the right to add, delete, modify, or otherwise change the content of this manual at any time. Specific information contained within the manual will be periodically modified to reflect current and future trends in teaching methodologies, construction and educational technologies, and lessons learned as Arkansas proceeds with the ongoing task of improving and maintaining its schools.
The Standards & Guidelines are organized into seven chapters that explain the planning, design, and construction process; suggest current educational best practices and facility planning concepts, recommend components of an education framework, identify the square footage provisions for each school level; detail the features and amenities of each space; and provide systems, materials, guidelines information; and technology infrastructure recommendations. This chapter contains an outline of the information found within this section of the Arkansas School Facility Manual and a summary of the standards and guidelines contained within each chapter.
The chapters included in this section of the Arkansas Schoof Facility Manual are:
Chapter 1 contains introductory information that indicates the organization of Section Two; an executive summary highlighting the standards and guidelines; a glossary of general Arkansas School Facility Manual definitions and abbreviations; and a general overview of the planning, design, and construction process intended to respond to the educational facility needs of Arkansas schools.
Chapter 2 contains planning concepts rel ated to current educational best practices, special education, workforce development, and program and design capacity. The facility planning concepts contained within this chapter are intended to be informative only and are not standards.
Chapter 3 contains a series of broad principles associated with organizational, facility, program, and service issues, including: grade configuration, school size, and class size. In conjunction with the Chapter 2: Educational Facility Planning Concepts, Chapter 3 provides assistance when developing an educational facility.
Chapter 4 contains information about site size and site amenities. Guidelines are also outlined for a multitude of factors that must be considered, including: various types of circulation and site access, drainage, play fields and playgrounds, fencing, lighting, mechanical/ Chapter 5 assists the school district in establishing the size and quantity of instructional and support spaces for construction of a new facility or an electrical yard, landscaping, site furnishings, and exterior security 'provisions.
Chapter 5 assists the school district in establishing the size and quantity of instructional and support spaces for construction of a new facility or an addition to an existing facility. The size of a school facility is based on totai student population and grade configuration. The Program of Requirements identifies an overall square feet for a facility and then identifies spaces that must be included and provides an allowance for additional support spaces that the district may choose based on their programs and method of delivery.
Chapter 6 contains space plates for each type of space in the Programs of Requirements. Most space plates contain a graphic representation and information related to features, loose furnishings, finishes, and notes.
Chapter 7 provides an overview and examples of the various materials and systems that have been used to establish a design standard and level of quality for the systems and materials to be incorporated into new school buildings and additions to existing school buildings.
The Standards and Guidelines contain a vast number of educational planning, facility design, and construction concepts. The next few pages serve as a summary of the standards and guidelines contained within Section Two of the Arkansas School Facility Manual. For additional information, refer to the various chapters for clarification.
Standards are identified by bolded text. Guidelines are identified as regular text.
| Chapter | Standards & Guidelines | Notes |
| 3 | GRADE CONFIGURATION The Program of Requirements has been developed to address any K-12 grade configuration. | |
| 3 | CLASS SIZE: A. Pre-Kindergarten/Kindergarten 20 students B. 1st Grade through 3rd Grade 25 students C. 4th Grade through 6th Grade 28 students D. 7th Grade through 12th Grade 30 students E. Workforce Development 30 students | Districts may decrease class size by adding teaching stations at their own expense or by utilizing innovative program delivery methods that allow multiple uses of spaces. |
| 5 | SQUARE FOOT PER STUDENT A. A gross square foot per student for the overall building may be calculated using the total student population and the total gross square feet indicated by the Program of Requirements. B. The Program of Requirements indicates the following approximate square foot per student ranges: 1. ES = -119-151 2. MS = -124 -182 3. HS = -161-243 4. PK-8 = Blended 5. PK-12 = Blended | Total student population is established by the highest projected enrollment beginning three years out from the date of the 10-year projection. |
| 5 | NET AND GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE The net square footage will be composed of the following two components: A. Required Spaces. The Program of Requirements identifies the quantity and size of all required spaces to provide an adequate education. B. Support Space Allowance. The Program of Requirements provides a net square foot allowance for districts to provide flexibility for their instructional programs. Districts must include the indicated support space allowance in a new school. Support space allowance shall not be used to increase the size of gymnasiums or auditoriums. C. The gross square footage will be equal to the net square footage plus a construction factor that accounts for wall thickness and equal to 10 of the total net square footage. | Size of the building is driven by the total number of students. The percentage of support space allowance is 10% for elementary school spaces and 15% for middle and high school spaces. |
| 5 | SIZE MODIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL SPACES A. The size standard for all individual required spaces is established by the Programs of Requirements located in Chapter 5. B. Sizes indicated by the Programs of Requirements located in Chapter 5 for support spaces are not intended to be standards but to serve as guidelines for planning and design purposes. C. Individual required spaces may NOT be removed or reduced in size. | The selection of support spaces is limited only by the following basic rules: a. The standard for total gross square footage must be met. Any overages will be at district expense. |
| 4 | SITE SIZE A. The recommended site sizes are: 1. Elementary School: 10 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students 2. Middle School: 20 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students 3. High School: 35 acres plus 1 acre per 100 | The site sizes shown should be considered as the minimum size to provide adeq uate pedestrian & vehicular circulation, parking for staff, students, & visitors, and playgrounds and playfields. |
| students 4. Combination Schools: a. PK-12 School: 40 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students b. PK-8 School: 20 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students B. Deviations from the site size may be required because of extenuating circumstances. The site sizes shown should be considered. | When selecting a site, the District should consider current and future student needs, changing demographics, and possible development around the site. It is recognized that not all sites, especially urban sites, will be able to meet those recommendations. The Design Professional, working with the District, should make every attempt to meet as many of the recommendations as possible. | |
| 5 | PROGRAMS The following programs are guidelines, it is the responsibility of each district to determine the appropriate programs for their students. The programs listed below were used to develop the spaces contained in the Programs of Requirements. A. Elementary Schools 1. Academic Core 2. Special Education 3. Visual Arts 4. Music 5. Physical Education B. Middle Schools 1. Academic Core 2. Special Education 3. Visual Arts 4. Music 5. Technology Education 6. Family and Consumer Sciences 7. Physical Education 8. Workforce Development C. High Schools 1. Academic Core 2. Special Education 3. Visual Arts 4. Music 5. Physical Education 6. Workforce Development 7. Alternative Education | Combination Schools contain the programs from which those schools are comprised. Example: A Pre-K - 8 school would contain all the elementary school programs and the middle school programs. Workforce development is an exception. Accreditation Requirements make it necessary for all comprehensive high schools to make available at least three programs of study from three different occupational areas. Refer to Workforce Development in Chapter 2. |
| 5 | SIZE OF SPECIFIC SPACES The following sizes are standards from the Programs of Requirements in Chapter 5. The spaces listed below are intended to be samples and representative of typical spaces. Regular Classrooms 850 SQFT Pre-Kindergarten/Kindergarten Classrooms1,000 SQFT Special Education Classrooms 850 SQFT Resource Room 450 SQFT Art Classroom 1,200 SQFT Music Classroom 1,200 SQFT Student Dining 50% TSP x 15 SQFT/Student | TSP = Total Student Population The Program of Requirements contained in Chapter 5 details the size and quantity of all instructional and support space allowances that must be included in new school construction. |
| 7 | EXTERIOR WALLS A. Options available for numerous, insulated wall systems. B. All systems to be well insulated and have moisture barrier. | Minimum insulation R values. 40-year minimum lifespan. |
| 7 | ROOFS A. New construction to be sloped or low slope roof system. B. Options available for numerous, UL class "A" systems with warranties. C. Vapor barrier are critical for weather protection. | Meet "energy star" values Minimum, thermal resistant U-values. |
| 7 | OPENINGS A. All academic spaces to have natural daylight. B. Minimize east and west facing glass. C. Interior wood doors to be solid core and factory finished. | Encourage top lighting. Provide uniform light distribution. Select formaldehyde-free doors constructed with recycled or recovered content. |
| 7 | INTERIOR FLOOR FINISHES A. Use water-based coatings and adhesives. B. Options available for soft and hard surface flooring. C. Choose low-VOC emitting materials. D. Meet carpet "green label plus" rating and use carpet reclamation programs. | Use products containing recycled content. |
| 7 | PLUMBING A. Water piping should not be installed under floor slabs. B. Domestic water systems within the building shall be type "K" or "L" copper tubing. | No additional notes. |
| 7 | HVAC A. All new construction will include air conditioning. B. Several systems are available and selection shall be based on a life cycle cost analysis. A. All temperature control systems shall be electronic, direct digital controls. B. Commissioning of HVAC is recommended. | All systems shall be designed in compliance with ASHRAE standard 90.1 Energy Code. Control indoor and outdoor HVAC noise. |
| 7 | ELECTRICAL A. Conductors shall only be copper. B. All branch circuits circuits should be run above ceilings and within walls. C. Interior lighting shall be controlled by occupancy sensors, automatic timed lighting controlled system or a combination of both. | Within building electric system, provide technology infrastructure such as cable trays, conduit, boxes, etc. |
| 8 | TECHNOLOGY A. All instructional spaces will be wired for voice, video, data, and power. B. All offices and meeting spaces will be wired for voice, data, and power. | Selected offices may also be wired for video. |
SCHOOL FACILITY BUILDING PROGRAMS
EXISTING FACILITIES
SAFE, DRY, and HEALTHY
PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT
Each building project shall begin with a PRE-DESIGN ASSESSMENT intended to develop a detailed scope of work as required to achieve "safe, dry, and healthy" criteria. The scope of work shall become the program for design and the 'yardstick' to measure the highest priority deficiencies in existing buildings. The following checklist would be used in the order of the priority indicated.
PRIORITY I
For example:
For example:
For example:
leaking
damaged
inadequate moisture barriers
inadequate insulation
inadequate drainage
flashings and accessories
PRIORITY II
PRIORITY III
PRIORITY IV
IMPLEMENTATION OF STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
Click here to view image
GENERAL ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL DEFINITIONS
Construction Factor
The construction factor shown is the area of a building which is used for wall thickness, pipe chase, lockers, etc., in the wall.
Distance Learning
The process of transmitting and/or receiving instruction and demonstration via video and/or audio means.
Guideline
A guide or recommendation; not required.
ORFF
Large instruments capable of being beat upon by children.
School District
A general term applied to a legally constituted school entity which is governed by a Board of Education. They may include city, local, exempted village, and joint vocational school districts.
Standard
A rule and requirement; mandatory.
Urban Sites
School facility sites that are reduced in size because of being land-locked or restricted by the topography.
Workforce Development
Programs at the 6-12 grade level to prepare students for entry into skilled work occupations.
INTRODUCTION
This chapter contains information that may be used by the Project Team regarding current and future educational "best practices", rules and regulations for students with disabilities, and current standards for Workforce Development programs in the State of Arkansas.
It is important to note that as the School District, Educational Planner, and Design Professionais begin to discuss the design, construction' or renovation of school facilities that time be allotted to consider what students will require to help them to be successful in the future. . Consideration should be given to current and future trends in educational programs and delivery methods, changes in coursework, impact of technology on teaching methods, and social, economical, and world issues.
This chapter along with Chapter 3 should provide the Project Team with "fodder" to fuel the creative thinking process and develop a school facility that not only meets the standards and guidelines, but positions the district to achieve the highest results in student education.
OVERVIEW
Public education is at a unique point in history. We have transitioned from the industrial age to the information age, and as most organizations have already done, school districts across the country are considering changing the way they do business. School districts are investigating curricula, organizational models, current and emerging technologies, the roie of administration, and their local communities to determine the effect each of these has on student performance.
These investigations have resulted in a series of educational "best practices" intended to provide students with the greatest opportunity for success. Implementing educational "best practices" can have a significant impact on facilities. The following describes a few educational "best practices", cites examples where they have been implemented, and expresses the impact each has on facilities. The information included with the examples is to help facilitate the planning, design and construction of school facilities.
CURRICULUM
Offer Essential Knowledge, Integrate It, and Make Connections to Real Life
Investigation and research suggest that the core of the high school curriculum must offer both the substance and the practicality to prepare students for an uncertain future. The curriculum should strive to meet individual needs without compromising larger goals. Dr. Willard Daggett, President of the International Center for Leadership in Education and a national expert on education, claims that schools should "make education
Click here to view image
rigorous and relevant for all students." Daggett uses a Rigor and Relevance Matrix to categorize curricula into one of four quadrants. Daggett defines rigor as the level of Bloom's Taxonomy achieved in any given lesson. He defines relevance as a continuum ranging from "knowledge in one discipline" to "applications to real-world unpredictable situations."
In an effort to make curricuium rigorous and relevant, ail sophomores at Oxford Hills Comprehensive High School, located in South Paris, Maine, take a class called the Human Experience (HumEx), which combines the study of math, biology, English and social studies. At the core of the integrated HumEx class is a problem-based approach to the curriculum. Instead of students simply studying content, they are expected to study, understand and then apply the content to a specific, "real" problem. During the school year '02 - '03, the students were charged with creating and maintaining their own model community. To solve the problem, the students studied ecology, philosophy, genetics, literature, economy, geometry, algebra, statistics, government, and poetry.
Adopting curricula that offer essential knowledge, integrated approaches, and connections to real life can have a significant impact on facilities. Facilities may require student production spaces for the creation of projects, small group rooms for collaboration, and large group presentation spaces for students to show their work.
ORGANIZATIONAL MODELS
Provide Student-Centered House Approach
Student-centered approaches provide students with a variety of opportunities to learn and develop skills and competencies based on their individual needs. Organizational models such as grade-level teaming, schools-with-in-a-school, and thematic approaches often characterize these student-centered approaches.
"Best practices" may suggest that facilities be organized into houses, instructional units comprised of classroom spaces, student production spaces, and teacher preparation areas. "Best practices" may also suggest that double-loaded corridor designs cannot provide the flexibility necessary to accommodate multiple organizational models nor can they foster the same level of cooperation, teaming, and sharing of professional resources as house designs.
Grade-level teaming is based on organizing the building into, separate grade-level units. Grade-ievel teams typically utilize an interdisciplinary approach.
Medina High School, located in Medina, Ohio, is organized into six 600-student grade-level houses. Each house contains learning centers, regular classrooms, for each of the core academic content areas [i.e. mathematics, science, English, social studies, foreign language, and business]. Students in each respective grade-leve! take their core academics in their house leaving only for specialty areas such as physical education, visual and performing arts,, and technology education. The goal of the grade-level teaming model for Medina High School is to create an environment, which facilitates personalized education and accommodates both departmentalized and interdisciplinary instructional approaches.
Alhambra High School, located in Phoenix, Arizona, is based on a school-within-a-school organizational model. Houses in Alhambra High Schools are comprised of regular classrooms, small group rooms, science, project lab, and teacher workroom. In addition, decentralized administrative spaces such as an assistant principal's office and an itinerant office are included in each house. The school-within-a-school model provides an opportunity for more interaction between students and administrators and between administrators and staff. The school within-a-school model also provides for the flexibility to operate as independent schools under the same roof.
Thematic teaming is based on delivering curriculum within the context of a specific theme. Themes may include Science and Math, Fine and Performing Arts, or Foreign Language and Literature.
Metro-Tech High School, a comprehensive academic and vocational high school located in Phoenix, Arizona, was renovated to incorporate a thematic organizational modej. Each house includes regular classrooms, science lab, a student production area, and a teacher workroom. Each house is specialized for one of five themes: Public Service, Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Business, and Marketing.
Implementing these organizational models, specifically the house concept, may offer significant advantages to the delivery of curriculum and observation of students. While the impact implementing the house concept as well as other models, has on facilities is continually being evaluated in terms of major systems, it typically should not outweigh the educational advantages.
TECHNOLOGY
Create Pervasive and Integrated Systems
Technology continues to evolve and influence education. Technology has traditionally been perceived as a stand-alone content area with its own dedicated spaces. "Best practices," however, may suggest that technology should be incorporated into every learning space and into all curricula. Incorporating technology can accomplish two basic goals of education: linking traditionally isolated content areas and providing teachers with tools to utilize understanding of multiple intelligences in their lessons.
Click here to view image
Howard Gardner has indicated in "Frames of Mind" that there are several different types of intelligences (linguistic, mathematical, musical, kinesthetic, spatial, intra persona I, interpersonal, and natural intelligence). Each person has strengths in some intelligences and weaknesses in others. Experts have indicated that students retain more information when several intelligences are involved in the learning process. For example, The NTL institute for Behavior Science reports that students retain only 10% of what they read, but retain 90% of what they read, see, hear, experience, and teach.
Incorporating technology into all learning spaces and into ail curricula can have a significant impact on facilities. First, all learning spaces would require access to voice, video, data ports, and electrical outlets. Second, infrastructure must be designed in such a way to allow access for maintenance and upgrades as technology continues to evolve.
Click here to view image
ADMINISTRATION
Increase Student Contact and Flexibility
As a result of recent violent crimes occurring in school facilities, school districts across the country are searching for both active and passive means of security. While not the only reason, "best practices" suggest that decentralizing administration may serve this purpose. The decentralization of administrative services may also provide the flexibility and opportunity for increased student contact, decreased student anonymity, and opportunities for passive supervision.
In addition, assistant principals, deans, and counselors form teams, are closer to the student and teacher, and can more efficiently use their time, expertise, and resources because their offices are located in the academic clusters. Communication between administrators is no longer an issue as access to instructional information and student records and maintaining a positive and secure school environment can be achieved through the effective use of technology.
Decentralizing administration affects faciiities only by the necessity to relocate offices and support spaces within each (earning community and/or other areas.
COMMUNITY USE
Instil! a Sense of Participation, Ownership, and Pride
"Best practices" suggest that facilities could serve not only as an instructional centers for students, but also as user-friendly centers of the communities. Facilities could provide programs and access to resources for adults, businesses, and other community organizations. Community/school partnerships are playing an increasing role in high school facilities. These partnerships provide students with expanded learning opportunities, professional development opportunities for staff, and a venue for community activities.
Providing access to and forming partnerships with the community can have a significant impact on facilities. Additional spaces such as parent or community volunteer rooms, community locker rooms, and storage spaces may be necessary. In addition, for security purposes, community access may require careful attention to the organization of the facility. Community accessible portions of the facility may need to be located in areas that permit the remainder of the facility to be secure before, during, and after school hours.
SUMMARY
As a result of the transition to the information age as well as the aging of facilities, school districts are investigating curricula, organizational models, current and emerging technologies, the role of administration, and their local communities to determine the effect each of these has on student performance.
The research and investigations provided within this chapter describes "best practices" that suggest the following:
* Curriculum
Offer Essential Knowledge, Integrate It, and Make Connections to Real Life
* Organizational Models
Provide Student-Centered House Approach
* Technology
Create Pervasive and Integrated System
* Administration
Increase Student Contact and Flexibility
* Community Use
Instill a Sense of Participation, Ownership, and Pride
These "best practices" are not intended to be solutions to all of the issues confronting schools. Schools may choose to utilize these "best practices" as they work as a team to discuss how best to provide educational opportunities to improve student achievement in their district
OVERVIEW
The Arkansas Department of Education - Special Education Unit complies with the Federal Regulations for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the Arkansas School Facility Manual provides square footage guidelines to comply with the educational program requirements. IDEA requires a district to provide a full continuum of services in a student's neighborhood/home school to the greatest extent possible in the Least Restrictive Environment.
The Rules and Regulations Governing Special Education and Related Services: Procedural Requirements and Program Standards provide eligibility criteria for students with disabilities to meet the Least Restrictive Environment requirement for all special needs students. These criteria assist in differentiating the type and number of spaces that are needed in each school to address the facility needs for students with disabilities. As each school district is planning for specific educational program needs in their new or renovated facilities, identifying the number of students in each of these options is important to appropriately provide the unique space requirements. The terms used to establish eligibility criteria are provided as part of this document to assist in identifying all of the students who need to be considered in the facility program needs.
DEFINITION OF TERMS
The term includes schizophrenia. The term does not apply to children who are socially maladjusted, unless it is determined that they have an emotional disturbance.
"Hearing impairment" also means an impairment in hearing, whether permanent or fluctuating, that adversely affects a child's educational performance but that is not included under the definition of deafness.
AudioloQical Indicators
Disorders Not Included - The term does not include learning problems that are primarily the result of visual, hearing, or motor disabilities, of mental retardation, of emotional disturbance, or of environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage.
"Speech or Language Impairment" means a communication disorder such as deviant articulation, fluency, voice, and/or comprehension and/or expression of language, spoken or written, which impedes the child's acquisition of basic cognitive and/or affective performance skills as established in the Basic Educational Skills manual developed by the Arkansas Department of Education.
Students with partial sight are those whose vision, although impaired, is still the primary channel of learning and, with adjustments, are able to perform the visual tasks required in the usual school situation. Generally, their visual acuity with correction is 20/70 or less.
Students with blindness are those with no vision or with little potential for developing vision as a primary channel for learning and, therefore, must rely upon tactile and auditory sense to obtain information.
INTRODUCTION
the current Standards for Accreditation of Public Schools require that secondary educational facilities offer a minimum of three programs of study from three different occupational areas. A list of all approved occupational areas, clusters or pathways, and programs of study is included in this manual to assist school districts, educational planners, and design professionals with anticipating space needs for these requirements.
Included below is an outline of the current workforce development programs. Each Occupational Area is organized in the following organizational structure.
OCCUPATIONAL AREAS
SPACE NEEDS
In order to meet the needs of Workforce Development programs, adequate laboratory, classroom, storage, and office space is needed. Chapter 5: Program of Requirements [Bracketing] contains a detailed list of the spaces that a District may include when designing a High School facility with Workforce Development programs.
It is important to point out that the District should determine the Occupational Areas to be delivered, the associated cluster or pathways, and the programs of study and then proceed to Chapter 5 to complete the Program of Requirement Worksheet. When completing the worksheet, the Project Team should select the laboratory space for each program of study and the related spaces such as offices, too! rooms, and storage needed to serve the laboratory space. Additional information can be found in Chapter 5.
INTRODUCTION An Educational Framework is a series of broad principles associated with organizational, facility, program, and service issues. En conjunction with the Educational Facility Planning Concepts, the Education Framework establishes the foundation on which educational facilities are designed.
The Standards & Guidelines are not intended to address every possible condition. Flexibility is required to develop appropriate solutions given the diversity of programs, community requirements, existing building conditions, site constraints, etc. found in the school district.
The following educational assumptions/concepts were derived from a wide range of sources that included representation from parents and students, teachers and school administrators, business and government [state and local] officials.
GRADE CONFIGURATION
Following are the suggested grade configurations for each level of school facility.
Pre-Kindergarten programs should be included as part of the school facility as required by state law.
Workforce Development courses are included in middle and high school facilities.
School size is based on the number of students projected to attend a particular school facility. For the number of students by grade level the Program of Requirements provides the total required school size that contains both the required spaces and a support space allowance needed to adequately meet the needs of the students.
The Program of Requirements found in Chapter 5 provides required spaces and a support space allowance for the selection of spaces needed for the various program areas found in each grade level of school.
CLASS SIZE
Class size [or Average class size] is defined as the number of students occupying a space at one time. Class size is not necessarily synonymous with student teacher ratio.
| A. | Pre-Kindergarten-Kindergarten | 20 students |
| B. | 1st Grade through 3rd Grade | 25 students |
| C. | 4th Grade through 6th Grade | 28 students |
| D. | 7th Grade through 12th Grade | 30 students |
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
Workforce Development [WFD] refers to programs traditionally offered under the label Career Technical Education or Vocational Education.
Note: Access to a WFD occupational area can occur in the following ways:
KINDERGARTEN
Kindergarten courses will be delivered all day.
PROGRAMS
As programs and services change it is important that each school district identify the current and future educational needs of its students. Once those needs have been identified, the District should then determine the types of instructional programs that will result in a successful student. The Standards & Guidelines are based on current and future trends in education and include the following programs. As stated above, ultimately each district should determine the appropriate programs for their students.
Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to assist the school district and the Design Professional with selection, purchase, and development of a site.
Site Selection Criteria
At first look, a potential site may appear to be a good acquisition. There are many factors, however, that can distort the picture. A large site can diminish if wetlands are to be avoided or if part of the area is in a floodplain. There must be a stream or other outsource nearby to remove storm drainage. Hilly topography can escalate site development costs. Adequate space is needed to retain and release storm water from the site.
Access to and from the site which has connection to a major highway or road artery is an important factor. Aside from the surface characteristics, sub-surface conditions require exploration. Preliminary soil borings should be taken to ascertain the presence of poor soil, high water table, voids, or other impediments. A Phase I environmental study should be a requirement.
Site Design
With a good site available, site design and layout becomes the task. Good site design dictates that bus and car traffic should not cross. Likewise, students should not be required to cross car traffic lanes either entering or leaving buses. Bus parking should be arranged in a continuous line or, preferably, in a 45 degree parking arrangement.
Visitor and staff parking, as well as a separate service drive, is recommended. Event parking is difficult to provide since large events usually only occur a couple times per year.
The orientation of the building is critical from an energy usage standpoint. The majority of the windows should face a north/south direction. Easy access to the main entrance should be obvious to all.
Good site design requires careful and thorough planning to provide maximum safety, and efficient utilization of site features.
Site Size
The recommended minimum site size is consistent with current Arkansas State Board of Education standards. The site size was also based on a compilation of code requirements from cities in the Midwest and practical experience of site design. Most state education departments either mandate or recommend the minimum number of acres needed for the specific grade levels. These size guidelines are consistent with those recommended in the Council of Educational Facility Planners international (CEFPI), Guide for School Facility Appraisal.
Site Design
From past professional site design experience, sound judgment can determine if the visual survey of the site will satisfy the project needs. Useable topography, good surface drainage, available site utilities, and vehicular access are important. Soil borings must be obtained. Site design criteria are good practice recommendations, rather than standards.
Site Size
PK-12 School: 40 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students
PK-8 School: 20 acres plus 1 acre per 100 students
Urban Site Size
Urban Site Introduction
Urban Building Footprint
| Percentage of Building Footprint to Total Area (GSF) | |||||||
| Building Size | GSF | 50% | 60% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 100% |
| ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS | |||||||
| 200 students | 34,400 | 34,400 | |||||
| 350 students | 47,600 | 47,600 | |||||
| 550 students | 70,400 | 49,280 | 56,320 | ||||
| 700 students | 89,600 | 62,720 | 71,680 | ||||
| MIDDLE SCHOOLS | |||||||
| 200 students | 32,600 | 32,600 | |||||
| 350 students | 54,600 | 54,600 | |||||
| 550 students | 86,350 | 60,445 | 69,080 | ||||
| 700 students | 109,200 | 65,520 | 76,440 | ||||
| HIGH SCHOOLS | |||||||
| 250 students | 51,750 | 51,750 | |||||
| 500 students | 95,500 | 66,850 | 76,400 | ||||
| 1,000 students | 178,000 | 106,800 | 124,600 | ||||
| 1,500 students | 249,000 | 124,500 | 149,400 | ||||
| 2,000 students | 322,000 | 161,000 | 193,200 | ||||
Urban Parking
Click here to view image
Note 1: Teaching stations are determined at a percentage of 1 per 25 students.
Note 2: Teachers are calculated at the following utilization of teaching stations:
Elementary 100%; Middle-85%; High School-85%.
Calculation: Teaching Station/Utilization percentage = Number of Teachers (247.85 = 29)
Note 3: Ancillary staff includes teaching aides, media center specialist, special education staff, etc. Total is calculated as percentage of the student population as follows: Elementary-2%; Middle-2%; High-1%.
Note 4: Administration includes principals, secretarial, and itinerant staff.
Note 5: Custodial/maintenance staff includes full-time staff for regular school hours.
Calculation: 1 staff per 150 students.
Note 6: Food service staff is calculated at 1 staff per 100 meals served with 80% building capacity participation for a full-service kitchen. Satellite kitchen would reduce staff by approximately 50-75%.
Note 7: Visitor parking is calculated at 2% of building student capacity.
Note 8: Student parking is calculated at 20% of all High School students.
Note 9: Minimum required parking is determined by the total of staff, visitor, and student parking or by required zoning.
Urban Elementary School - 350 students
| Building Footprint (One-Story) | 47,600 SF | 1.09 acres |
| PK-2/3-5 Playgrounds (see Note 1) | 17,500 SF | 0.40 acre |
| Parking and Drives (see Note 2) | 15,200 SF | 0.35 acre |
| Play Fields (see Note 3): | 96,840 SF | 2.22 acres |
| one multipurpose field (360'x250') one softball field (200' outfield) one basketball court | ||
| Subtotal: | 177,140 SF | 4.06 acres |
| Add 20% Greenspace (see Note 4) | 35.428 SF | 0.81 acre |
| TOTAL: | 212,568 SF | 4.88 acres |
| Recommended site size: | 5.25 acres |
Note 1: This space footage, based on 50 SF per student, allows for a hard surface play area and a soft surface play equipment area for each playground.
Note 2: This estimate of area, based on 400 SF per car, allows for drives, a drop-off/
pick-up zone, and a service area drive.
Note 3: Softball fields may partially overlap multipurpose field.
Note 4: Setting aside 20% of the site square footage requirements as greenspace ensures adequate space for separation of the various elements located on each site. Site landscaping is included in this area.
Urban Middle School - 550 students
| Building Footprint (Two-Story) | 69,080 SF | 1.59 acres |
| Parking and Drives (see Note 1) | 26,000 SF | 0.60 acre |
| Play Fields (see Note 2): | 400.264 SF | 9.19 acres |
| one six-lane running track one soccer/football and event field in track interior one baseball field (350' outfield) two softball fields (200' outfield) two basketball courts | ||
| Subtotal: | 495,344 SF | 11.38 acres |
| Add 25% Greenspace (see Note 3) | 123.836 SF | 2.84 acres |
| TOTAL: | 619,180 SF | 14.22 acres |
| Recommended site size; | 14.50 acres |
Note 1: This estimate of area, based on 400 SF per car, allows for drives, a drop-off/ pick-up zone, and a service area drive.
Note 2: Pole vault is not included at track.
Note 3: Setting aside 25% of the site square footage requirements as greenspace ensures adequate space for separation of the various elements located on each site. Site landscaping is included in this area.
Urban High School -1,000 students
| Building Footprint | 106,800 SF | 2.45 acres |
| Parking and Drives (see Note 1) | 124,400 SF | 2.86 acres |
| Play Fields (see Note 2): | 797,090 SF | 18.30 acres |
| one eight-lane running track one soccer/football and event field in track interior one practice football field one practice soccer field two baseball fields (350' outfield) two softball fields (250' outfield) ten tennis courts four basketball courts | ||
| Subtotal: | 1,028,290 SF | 23.61 acres |
| Add 30% Greenspace (see Note 3) | 308.487 SF | 7.08 acres |
| TOTAL: | 1,336,777 SF | 30.69 acres |
| Recommended site size: | 31.00 acres |
Note 1: This estimate of area, based on 400 SF per car, allows for drives, a drop-off/
pick-up zone, and a service area drive.
Note 2: Pole vault is not included at track.
Note 3: Setting aside 30% of the site square footage requirements as greenspace ensures adequate space for separation of the various elements located on each site. Site landscaping is included in this area.
Outdoor Athletic and Recreation Fields
Baseball: Based on 350' radius to centerfield and 300' radius to right and left outfield with 60' offset from baseline to sideline fence.
| 135,806 SF | 3.12 acres | |
| Softball: | ||
| One field with outfield overlapping multi-purpose field | ||
| (includes 360' x 195' multipurpose field) | 91,200 SF | 2.09 acres |
| One field - no overlap | 53,824 SF | 1.24 acres |
| Soccer/multiourDose field: | 7 0,200 SF | 1.61 acres |
| Track and field events: | ||
| 6-lane track, with interior field {no events) | ||
| 146,000 SF | 3.35 acres | |
| 6-lane track, with interior field and discus/shot-put commbo: | ||
| 1 73,222 SF | 3.98 acres | |
| 8-lane track, with interior field & events | ||
| 187,500 SF | 4.30 acres | |
| Tennis: 10 courts | 66,530 SF | 1.53 acres |
| 4 courts | 24,480 SF | 0.56 acre |
Basketball: Courts are 84' x 50'. Courts in quantity of 1-2 have 5' surrounding and between courts. Courts in quantity of 3 and up have 10' on ends and 5' to sides and between courts.
| 1 court | 5,640 SF | 0.13 acre |
| 2 courts | 10,810 SF | 0.25 acre |
| 3 courts | 23,400 SF | 0.54 acre |
| 4 courts | 34,840 SF | 0.80 acre |
General
Aside from site size described in Chapter 4, the following are factors to be considered for judging the merits of a potential site.
Topography
Vehicular Access
Soli Characteristics
Site Utilities
Site Preparation
Codes and Zoning
Adjacent Property Facilities
Easements and Rights-of-Way
Environmental Restrictions
Testing
Aesthetic Consideration
Vehicular Circulation
Pedestrian Circulation
Storm Sewer System
Detention Pond
Sanitary / Sewerage
Directional Signage
Playgrounds
Lighting
Landscaping
Positive Drainage
Purpose
The information in this chapter consists of a diagram, features, ioose furnishings, finishes, and notes which is referred to as a "space plate". There is a space plate for each room in each program area in each school level. The purpose is to provide the Design Professionals and School Districts with guidelines to condition, finish, and equip each space.
Description
The diagram is not intended to fix the size or shape of that room. The size of each space is stated in the bracketing chapter (chapter 5). Features noted are desirable, but quantities must be determined in relation to the size and capacity stated in the bracketing section. In some cases, casework can be fixed or moveable. Loose furnishings are normally furniture items needed to complete the space.
Each room has a unique code that appears in the bracketing section and on the space plate. Example: E-AC-1 (E = elementary, AC = academic core, 1 = space plate #1)
Finishes are suggested options from life-cycle cost analysis that resulted in economical, durable, and maintainable finishes. Refer to material standards and guidelines in Chapter 7.
Plumbing, HVAC, and electrical provisions must first of all conform to all appropriate building and energy codes. In addition to the notes on each space plate, Design Professionals should provide good design recommendations that enhance code requirements where possible.
Technology is a vital part of teaching programs. Careful programming and early infrastructure inclusion in the design of the facility is recommended.
Purpose
The intent of Chapter 7 is to provide standards and guidelines necessary to plan, design and construct school facilities throughout the state of Arkansas. The focus is on building systems and materials that will provide buildings that are economical and reflect quality construction, along with mandatory performance standards, additional options and available choices. All items and systems, such as loose furnishings, casework, technology, etc., should be integrated early in the planning phase of the project.
Definitions
The planning and design of school facilities shall be based upon criteria described in Chapter 7 in accordance with the following definitions:
"Standards in bold" - Performance or construction required items for which there is mandatory adherence.
"Guidelines" - Performance or construction items which are recommended, but NOT required.
"Examples" - Typical component(s) of standards or guidelines.
Codes and Standards
Applicable local, state, and international building codes and standards are not repeated in this chapter. It is the responsibifity of the Design Professionals to conform to the current codes in their design process. Should the standards contained in this manual be in conflict with international, state, or local codes, the established codes shall prevail. The requirements of ADAAG (Americans with Disabilities Act) should be consulted.
No attempt has been made to provide detailed specifications in Chapter 7. Standards and guidelines are available that allow architects and engineers the flexibility to design to fit the school district needs.
Applicability
The construction and performance standards and guidelines contained herein are applicable to both new construction of public school facilities and renovation of existing public school facilities. Every attempt should be made to apply these standards and guidelines to existing buildings, in gradual steps as funding and other influences allow, {refer to Chapter 1 It may be recognized that some standards may not be compatible with existing facilities in renovation projects nor may it be possible to completely conform a performance or construction standard to new a new facility. It those instances variances to those standards, upon request, may be granted by the Division.
Green Building Design (optional)
A strong motive of these building systems standards and guidelines is to promote high performance schools. High performance schools are healthy, comfortable, energy efficient, resource efficient, water efficient, safe, secure, adaptable, and easy to operate and maintain. Designing for high performance goals is a guideline. It is to be considered, but not mandatory.
Commissioning (optional)
The commissioning process is a single-point responsibility to make sure that certain systems in a building are functioning and performing according to the design intent. The independent Commissioning Agent goes far beyond the occasional Design Professional job visits during the construction period. Actual tests are performed and components are verified under the guidance of the Commissioning Agent. Several systems can be commissioned, but emphasis in the chapter is to commission thef HVAC components.
Definition
Commissioning is the process of ensuring that systems are designed, installed, functionally tested, and capable of being operated and maintained according to the Owner's operational needs.
Application
Commissioning may be applicable to both new facilities and renovation. It is a guideline to be considered, but not mandatory.
Commissioning Authority (CA)
The CA is in charge of the commissioning process and is an objective, independent advocate of the Owner.
Commissioning Authority Options
CA can be selected from an independent third party; a mechanical or installing contractor; or a design professional.
Contractor: Desirable when building is small and contractor performs ali mechanical work, but a conflict of interest can arise.
Design Professional: Good idea provided that the project specifications detail the requirements. Already familiar with the design intent but may not have day-to-day experience in the process.
How To Select
Use competitive Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and follow a qualification based selection process (QBS).
CA Qualifications
Experience required:
* Designing, specifying, or installing educational building mechanical control systems or general HVAC systems
* Working with project teams and conducting "scoping meetings"
* Building systems start-up, balancing, testing, and troubleshooting
* Commissioning at least two projects involving HVAC and lighting controls
* Writing functional performance-test plans for at least two projects.
Extent of Commissioning
The degree or extent of commissioning for new buildings is recommended for the planning, design, and construction phases. However, involvement can occur only in design, construction, or post-construction phases.
What to Commission
All projects that include controls, EMCS, pneumatic equipment, integrated systems, HVAC-refated equipment, and air distribution systems should be commissioned.
Benefits
* Improved performance of building equipment and building systems interactions
* Improved fAQ occupant comfort and productivity
* Decreased potential for building Owner liability'related to IAQ ' [DOT] Reduced operation and maintenance costs '
* Maximize energy efficiency
* Provide training for school personnel
Green Building Design (optional)
The term "green building" is synonymous with "high-performance building", "sustainable design and construction", as well as other terms that refer to a holistic approach to design and construction. Green building design strives to balance environmental responsibility, resource efficiency, occupant comfort and well-being, and community sensitivity. Green building design includes all players in an integrated development process, from the design team (building owners, architects, engineers, and consultants), to the construction team {materials manufacturers, contractors, and waste haulers), to the maintenance staff and building occupants. The green building process results in a high-quality product that maximizes the owner's return on investment.
Why Design Green?
The building sector has a tremendous impact on the environment. According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), buildings in the United States consume more than 30% of our total energy and 60% of our electricity annually. Buildings are a major source of pollutants that cause urban air quality problems and contribute to climate change. Buildings produce 35% of the country's carbon dioxide emissions. Green building practices can substantially reduce the negative environmental impacts associated with these buildings and reverse the trend of unsustainable construction activities. Green design also reduces operating costs, enhances building marketability, potentially increases occupant productivity, and helps create a sustainable community. Green design has environmental, economic, and social elements that benefit all stakeholders, including owners, occupants, and the general public.
Creating High Performance Schools (optional)
School districts around the country are finding that smart energy choices can help them save money and provide healthier, more effective learning environments. By incorporating energy improvements into their construction or renovation plans, school can significantly reduce energy consumption and costs. These savings can then be redirected to educational needs such as additional teachers, instructional materials, or new computers.
Establishing High Performance Goals
Cost-effective energy- and resource-efficient schools start with good planning. Working closely with the school's design and planning staff, the architects and engineers should develop objectives that reflect local conditions and priorities, balance short-term needs and long-term savings, and address environmental issues. Goals can include reducing operating costs; designing building that teach; improving academic performance; protecting the environment; increasing health, safety, and comfort; supporting community values; and considering emerging solutions.
Establishing day lighting objectives will also improve classroom conditions and can help improve performance if you:
Green Building Rating System (optional)
The Green Building Initiative design program called Green Globes and the program offered by the U.S. Green Building council, LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), are green measurement systems designed for rating commercial and institutional buildings. Both address new construction and major renovations. The programs address various environmental categories, typically sustainable sites, water efficiency, energy, indoor environmental quality, and materials and resources. Both are performance oriented systems where points are earned for satisfying performance criteria. Different levels of green building certification are awarded based on the total points earned.
Application
Green building design may be applicable to both new facilities and renovation. It is a guideline to be considered, but not mandatory.
Components
Standards
otherwise approved by an independent testing agency.
Guidelines
Examples
Standards
Examples
NOTE: Other types of exterior wall construction may be acceptable if type meets or exceeds the above performance standards criteria. Construction standards following, indicated in bold type, are to be considered mandatory minimum requirements. More stringent requirements shall be used when required by the current state building codes and fire prevention codes.
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Purpose
Examples
NOTE:
#1: Other types of roof systems may be acceptable if system meets or exceeds the performance standards listed below.
#2: All roof system and products shall be designed in accordance with state fire prevention code and state building code.
Performance Standards
Components
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Components
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Guidelines
Components
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Components
Constructions Standards
Performance Standards
Components
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Components
Construction Standards
Performance Standards
Performance Guidelines
Examples
Components
Construction Standards
Performance Standards
Guidelines
Examples
Examples
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Standards
Construction Standards
Performance Standards
Examples
* Resilient
* Carpeting
* Rubber
* Tile
* Terrazzo
* Concrete
* Wood
* Resilient
* Rubber
* Resinous
* Hardwood
Construction Guidelines
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Examples
Performance Guidelines
Construction Standards
Performance Guidelines
Examples
Examples
Construction Guidelines
Examples
Construction Guidelines
Performance Standards
The K-12 school environment requires special needs for equipment and furnishings. These items must be strong and sturdy to last many decades. Manufacturers must specialize in these areas to meet the broad age range of students. Safety of their products is essential and they must meet standards, codes, and accessibility guidelines.
With casework, environmentally preferable product alternates should be utilized, such as oriented strand board and recycled plastic. Equipment and furnishings must be as maintenance-free as possible and easily cleaned.
Examples
Components
Standards
Guidelines
Components
Standards
Guidelines
General Guidelines
Site Design Parameters Guidelines
Valving Standards
Hangers Standards
Identification Guidelines
Testing Guidelines
Potable Water System Standards
Domestic Water Heater System Standards
Water Conditioning and Softening Systems Guidelines
Sanitary Piping System Standards
Gas Piping Systems Standards
Roof Drain and Storm Sewer Systems Standards
Plumbing Systems for Food Service Areas Standards
Building Fire Protection Systems Standards
Plumbing Fixtures and Specialties Standards
General Standards
System Selection Life Cycle Cost Analysis Guidelines
Outdoor Air Design Values Guidelines
Indoor Air Design Values Guidelines
Outdoor Air Ventilation Requirements Standards
Temperature Control Systems
Interior and Exterior Noise Control Guidelines
Equipment Accessibility Standard
Closeout Documents Guidelines
Physical Education and Indoor Practice Facility Guidelines
Energy Usage Standards
Electrical Distribution Standards
efficient type.
Independent, separate raceway, wiring, and transfer switches shall be provided for emergency life safety systems and non-emergency life safety systems.
Lighting Standards
Where the total emergency power load exceeds 8 kW, emergency power shall be delivered by on-site, standby power generator. Generators rated 150 kW and below shall use gaseous fuel (if available, large units shall be diesel).
Wiring Devices Standards
Fire Alarm System Standards
Security Systems Standards
Lightning Protection Standards
Technology Electrical Standards
Telecommunications Grounding Standards
Intercom / Bell Systems Guidelines
SCHOOL LIGHTING LEVELS - 2004
| ROOM TYPE CLASSIFICATION | 2000 IES FOOTCANDLES | RECOMMENDED DESIGN FOOTCANDLES DIRECT LIGHTING(1) | RECOMMENDED DESIGN FOOTCANDLES INDIRECT LIGHTING |
| ADMINISTRATIVE | |||
| Offices/Receptionist | 50 | 50 | 40 |
| Storage Rooms | - | 25 | 25 |
| Restrooms | 5 | 25-30 | 25-30 |
| Conference/Resource Rooms | 30-100 | 50 | 40 |
| Health Clinic | 50 | 50 | 40 |
| Teacher Prep/Workroom | 50 | 50 | 40 |
| CLASSROOMS-GENERAL | 30 | 50 | 40 |
| Art Rooms/Kiln | 50 | 50 | 40 |
| Modular Technology Labs | - | 50 | 40 |
| CADD Labs | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Industrial Tech/Production Labs | 100 | 60 | 60 |
| Computer Labs | 30 | 40 | 40 |
| Graphics Labs | 30-100 | 50 | 40 |
| Life Skills Labs | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Science Labs | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Laundry Rooms | - | 25 | 25 |
| Music Rooms | 30-50 | 50 | 40 |
| Large Group instruction Rooms | 30 | 50 | 40 |
| MEDIA CENTER | - | 50 | 40 |
| Active Areas | 30 vertical | 50 | 40 |
| Inactive Areas | 5 vertical | 40 | 40 |
| ATHLETIC AREAS | |||
| Gymnasium - Elementary School | 100 | 50 | - |
| Gymnasium - Middle School | 100 | 50 | - |
| Gymnasium - High School | 100 | 60 | - |
| Multi-use P.E. Rooms | - | 50 | - |
| Locker Rooms | 10 | 25 | 25 |
| STUDENT DINING | |||
| Assembly | 10-20 | 20 | - |
| Stage/Work Lights | 30 | 20 | - |
| Make-up/Dressing Rooms | 30-50 | 50 | - |
| Theatrical Control Room | 10-30 | 30 | - |
| Equipment room with dimmable incandescent lighting offering 10 foot-candles of illumination. | |||
| STUDENT DINING | 10-50 | 50 | 40 |
| Cooking | 50 | 75-80 (2) | - |
| Food Preparation | 50 | 75-80 (2) | - |
| Serving Line | 50 | 75-80 (2) | - |
| Ware Washing | 10 | 75-80 (2) | - |
| CUSTODIAL CLOSETS | 10-30 | 20-30 | - |
| ELECTRICAL ROOMS | 30 | 20-30 | - |
| MECHANICAL ROOMS | 30 | 30 | - |
| PARKING AREA | .2 | 1(3) | - |
| DRIVEWAYS | .3 | .5(3) | - |
| CIRCULATION AREAS | |||
| Building Entries | 5 | 5-10(3) | - |
| Corridors | 5 | 20 | 20 |
| Corridors with Lockers | 5 | 20 | 20 |
| Stairways | 5 | 20 | 20 |
| (1) Maintenance factor 70% LL/SF = Lamp Lumens per square foot | |||
| (2) Foot-candles shall comply with local health department regulations | |||
| (3) Foot-candles shall conform to page 4200-6 | |||
Outlet Locations
| ELECTRICAL OUTLET DEVICE TYPE | Masonry Wall, Base (Starter) Course Heiqht 4 inch | 8 inch Mounting Height Above Floor to Bottom of Outlet (Device) Box | |
| Receptacle outlets, microphone outlets (jacks), equipment outlets flacks), television outlets flacks), portable telephone outlets, computer outlets, etc. * General throughout * Mechanical equipment rooms * Above counter tops 30"H 36"H 48"H * Above backsplash top * Above radiators * Above or adjacent to lavatories * Behind domestic refrigerators * Behind domestic washers and dryers * Serving domestic dishwashers * Wall-mounted telephone outlets * Telephone/video control | 18" 52" 36" 44" 52" 2" minimum 6" minimum 44" 52" 36" 2" 44" 44" | 18" 48" 40" 48" 56" 2" minimum 6" minimum 48" 56" 32" 2" 48" 48" |
| Toqgie switches | 48" | 48" |
| Recessed motor controllers | 60" | 56" |
| Electric panels, terminal.cabinets, etc., to center of tub or box | 50" | 48" |
| Clocks | Near ceiling | Near ceiling |
| Pull stations (fire alarm) | 44" | 44" |
| Volume controls, call-in switches, doorbell buttons | 44" | 44" |
| Horn/strobes (fire alarm) | 80" | 80" |
Genera! Guidelines
Backbones
Wiring Standards
Telecommunication Room Wiring Guidelines '
Telecommunication Room Wiring Standards: Interior Environment
Telecommunication Room Terminations
Building Wiring Guidelines
Telephone System Standards
A school telephone system shall be as follows:
Telephone System Guidelines
Video Distribution System Standards
Data / Computer Network System Standards
Central Sound System / Public Address System Standards
Gymnasium Sound Reinforcement System Guidelines
High School Student Dining Area Sound Reinforcement System Guidelines
Student Dining Sound Reinforcement System Guidelines (Cafetoriums only)
Music Room Sound Reinforcement System Guidelines
Security Systems Guidelines (optional)
Interactive Classroom Design Guidelines (optional)
Videoconferencing classrooms require special attention to ensure that the highest quality sound and visual signals are transmitted and received by participants. The following are recommendations on the building of interactive videoconferencing rooms.
ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS (POR) SUMMARY AND REQUIRED SPACES
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
SUITABILITY ANALYSIS
Click here to view image
ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL
PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS
SCHOOL SUPPORT SPACES (NOT REQUIRED)
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL
PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT (Required for 9-12)
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
Click here to view image
ARKANSAS SCHOOL FACILITY MANUAL
PROGRAM OF REQUIREMENTS
REQUIRED SPACES NOTES
Click here to view image
APPENDIX "C"
ACADEMIC FACILITIES PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
September 2011
PROJECT AGREEMENT
(Applicable beginning with Partnership Projects for 2013-2015 Biennium)
Project Name: Click to enter Project Name.
Project Number: Click to enter Project Number
This Project Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the Divisionof Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation ("Division ") and the Click to enter District Name School District ("District"), Click to enter County. County, pursuant to A.C.A. § 6-20-2507.
WHEREAS, The Division, created pursuant to Act 1327 of 2005 is a body corporate and politic, an agency of state government and an instrumentality of the State of Arkansas ("State "), performing essential government functions of the State; and
WHEREAS, the District is acting as an agency of state government, performing essential functions of government pursuant to the laws of the State of Arkansas, and
WHEREAS, the District and the Division have approved a Master Facilities Plan describing the classroom facilities needs of the entire student population of the district, and the total budget for the Public School Academic Facilities Project ("Project");and
WHEREAS,the District and the Division acknowledge that for funding and planning purposes, the Project is anticipated to commence on Click to enter Date. and be completed on Click to enter Date..
NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the District and the Division agree to cooperate in the design, construction and terms described herein and as follows.
This Project Agreement ("Agreement") will become effective upon the signing of both parties and be binding on the date signed by the Director of the Division of Public School Academic Facilities. The district certifies that scope planning and financial planning have been completed prior to the project application submission. No additional aspect of the project will proceed prior to the signing of this agreement. By signing, the district certifies that it has not begun the project beyond the steps outlined above. The signing of this agreement certifies that the Commission for Arkansas Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation ("Commission") has approved the project and funding under the Academic Facilities Partnership Program. The district further acknowledges by signing that, should it be determined that the Project began prior to the signing of this agreement, the Commission may exercise one of the following options:
Furthermore, if construction of the project has not commenced by (enter date 18 months from Commission approval)Click to enter Date, this agreement is null and void and any monies paid by the state to a district shall be subject to immediate recapture by the state. The parties agree to exercise good faith in the execution of this agreement and the completion of the requirements set forth herein, and that both parties will endeavor to follow and implement the aspects of the program, the district agrees to comply with all timelines and process requirements in the Rules Governing the Partnership Program or be subject to those Commission options referenced above.
If this is a warm, safe and dry project, give complete description of the system, or systems, being replaced in the detailed scopes of steps 3 and 4.
(Do not attach the application as the scope)
(Do not attach the application as the scope) b.Funded project square feet or appropriate unit: Click to enter Funded Size.
State financial participation of the total Project budget shall be: $Click to enter State Participation..
State "green building incentive": $Click to enter Green Building Incentive..
Total state financial participation: $Click to enter Total State Financial Participation..
The District's local share of the total Project budget shall be $Click to enter Districts Local Share of Project, forth in Article IV of this Agreement.
The division and district shall be responsible for the following:
| School District | Division |
| Determination of project Scope (Partnership Project Application) | Review and approval (application review) |
| Architect/Engineer, Construction Manager (if desired), Construction Contractor selection process | Provide guidance as requested pertaining to procurement laws |
| Submittal of project construction drawings in PDF format and full size printed copy (preliminary floor plans for space projects recommended for preliminary review) | Review for conformance with facility manual |
| Site selection and request | Provide recommended guidelines contained in the Arkansas Facility Manual |
| Request for variance consideration of the Arkansas Facility Manual | Division plan review and variance determination |
| Educational program choices, | Approval in accordance with design and material choices with current state law and Arkansas Facility Manual |
| Recommend special conditions documents | Provide recommended contract clauses for architect and construction contracts |
| Bid procedures | No action |
| Submission of project approval forms and state reviews | Final project approval |
| Recommendation of award, notification of bids | No action |
| Fund management in accordance with Arkansas Department of Education accounting guidelines | Audit option |
| Provide Maintenance Plan/Certification | Verify new buildings are in the MAPPS database and the computerized maintenance management system. |
(To include letters of credit, moneys donated or contributions spent directly by a third party.)
(Specify origin of Grant and any special conditions that might affect this Project as a result of the grant award.)
No Fund moneys shall be spent for any items inconsistent with the provisions of the Arkansas School Facility Manual and Division policies, unless a variance is approved by the Division.
Upon completion of the project, the district will create the preventative maintenance schedules of any new space facility is included in the District's overall maintenance plan contained in the district's computerized maintenance management system as required by the Academic Facilities Master Plan prior to final payment by the Division.
In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date(s) set forth below.
Click here to view image
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF APPENDIX B:
Appendix B: (Part 1), will be submitted initially with the Agreement when forwarded to the Division. It will indicate the elements of the budget amounts for all expected expenditures. It is intended to be a 1 time submittal but may be updated as if new requirements of expense are identified.
Appendix B: (Part 2) will be submitted with each payment request to the state. It will indicate the areas noted and will be accompanied by contract invoices.
Appendix B: (Part 3) will be submitted with each State Payment Request, if required, to provide the change order information.
Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation APPENDIX B (Parti) Budget
Click here to view image
Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation APPENDIX B (Part 2) State Payment Request
Click here to view image
Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation APPENDIX B (Part 3) Change Order {CIO) Report
Click here to view image
Arkansas Division of Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation APPENDIX B (Part 3) Change Order {CIO) Report - Page 2
Click here to view image