Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 18, § 24349(h) - * Retirements
(1) Gains and Losses on Retirements. For the
purposes of this regulation the term "retirement" means the permanent
withdrawal of depreciable property from use in the trade or business. The
withdrawal may be made in one of several ways. For example, the withdrawal may
be made by selling or exchanging the asset, or by actual abandonment. In
addition, the asset may be withdrawn from such productive use without
disposition as, for example, by being placed in a supplies or scrap account.
The tax consequences of a retirement depend upon the form of the transaction,
the reason therefor, the timing of the retirement, the estimated useful life
used in computing depreciation, and whether the asset is accounted for in a
separate or multiple asset account. Upon the retirement of assets, the rules in
this regulation apply in determining whether gain or loss will be recognized,
the amount of such gain or loss, and the basis for determining gain or loss:
(a) Where an asset is retired by sale at
arm's length, recognition of gain or loss will be subject to the provisions of
Sections 24901, 24902, and other applicable provisions of law.
(b) Where an asset is retired by exchange,
the recognition of gain or loss will be subject to the provisions of sections
24901, 24902, 24941, and other applicable provisions of law.
(c) Where an asset is permanently retired
from use in the trade or business but is not disposed of by the taxpayer or
physically abandoned (as, for example, when the asset is transferred to a
supplies or scrap account), gain will not be recognized. In such a case loss
will be recognized measured by the excess of the adjusted basis of the asset at
the time of retirement over the estimated salvage value or over the fair market
value at the time of such retirement if greater, but only if--
(i) The retirement is an abnormal retirement,
or
(ii) The retirement is a normal
retirement from a single asset account (but see paragraph (4) of this
regulation for special rule for item accounts), or
(iii) The retirement is a normal retirement
from a multiple asset account in which the depreciation rate was based on the
maximum expected life of the longest lived asset contained in the
account.
(d) Where an
asset is retired by actual physical abandonment (as, for example, in the case
of a building condemned as unfit for further occupancy or other use), loss will
be recognized measured by the amount of the adjusted basis of the asset
abandoned at the time of such abandonment. In order to qualify for the
recognition of loss from physical abandonment, the intent of the taxpayer must
be irrevocably to discard the asset so that it will neither be used again by it
nor retrieved by it for sale, exchange, or other disposition. Experience with
assets which have attained an exceptional or unusual age shall, with respect to
similar assets, be disregarded in determining the maximum expected useful life
of the longest lived asset in a multiple asset account. For example, if a
manufacturer establishes a proper multiple asset account for 50 assets which
are expected to have an average life of 30 years but which will remain useful
to him for varying periods between 20 and 40 years, the maximum expected useful
life will be 40 years, even though an occasional asset of this kind may last 60
years.
(2) Definition of
Normal and Abnormal Retirements. For the purpose of this regulation the
determination of whether a retirement is normal or abnormal shall be made in
the light of all the facts and circumstances. In general, a retirement shall be
considered a normal retirement unless the taxpayer can show that the withdrawal
of the asset was due to a cause not contemplated in setting the applicable
depreciation rate. For example, a retirement is considered normal if made
within the range of years taken into consideration in fixing the depreciation
rate and if the asset has reached a condition at which, in the normal course of
events, the taxpayer customarily retires similar assets from use in his
business. On the other hand, a retirement may be abnormal if the asset is
withdrawn at an earlier time or under other circumstances, as, for example,
when the asset has been damaged by casualty or has lost its usefulness suddenly
as the result of extraordinary obsolescence.
(3) Basis of Assets Retired. The basis of an
asset at the time of retirement for computing gain or loss shall be its
adjusted basis for determining gain or loss upon a sale or other disposition as
determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 24911 and the following
rules:
(a) In the case of a normal retirement
of an asset from a multiple asset account where the depreciation rate is based
on average expected useful life, the term "adjusted basis" means the salvage
value estimated in determining the depreciation deduction in accordance with
the provisions of Reg. 24349(a)(3),
(b) In the case of a normal retirement of an
asset from a multiple asset account in which the depreciation rate was based on
the maximum expected life of the longest lived asset in the account, the
adjustment for depreciation allowed or allowable shall be made at the rate
which would have been proper if the asset had been depreciated in a single
asset account (under the method of depreciation used for the multiple asset
account) using a rate upon the maximum expected useful life of that asset,
and
(c) In the case of an abnormal
retirement from a multiple asset account the adjustment for depreciation
allowed or allowable shall be made at the rate which would have been proper had
the asset been depreciated in a single asset account and using a rate based
upon either the average expected useful life or he maximum expected useful life
of the asset, depending upon the method of determining the rate of depreciation
used in connection with the multiple asset account.
(4) Special Rule for Item Accounts.
(a) As indicated in paragraphs (1)(c)(ii) and
(iii) of this regulation, a loss is recognized upon the normal retirement of an
asset from a single asset account but a loss on the normal retirement of an
asset in a multiple asset account is not allowable where the depreciation rate
is based upon the average useful life of the assets in the account. Where a
taxpayer with more than one depreciable asset chooses to set up a separate
account for each such asset and the depreciation rate is based on the average
useful life of such assets (so that it uses the same life for each account),
the question arises whether its depreciation deductions in substance are the
equivalent of those which would result from the use of multiple asset accounts
and therefore, it should be subject to the rules governing losses on
retirements of assets from multiple asset accounts. Where a taxpayer has only a
few depreciable assets which it chooses to account for in single asset
accounts, particularly where such assets cover a relatively narrow range of
lives, it cannot be said in the usual case that the allowance of losses on
retirements from such accounts clearly will distort income. This results from
the fact that where a taxpayer has only a few depreciable assets it is usually
not possible clearly to determine that the depreciation rate is based upon the
average useful life of such assets. Accordingly, it cannot be said that the
taxpayer is in effect clearly operating with a multiple asset account using an
average life rate so that losses should not be allowed on normal retirements.
Therefore, losses normally will be allowed upon retirement of assets from
single asset accounts where the taxpayer who has only a few depreciable assets.
On the other hand, when a taxpayer who has only a few depreciable assets
chooses to account for them in single asset accounts, using for each account a
depreciation rate based on the average useful life of such assets, and the
assets cover a wide range of lives, the likelihood that income will be
distorted is greater than where the group of assets covers a relatively narrow
range of lives. In those cases where the allowance of losses would distort
income, the rules with respect to the allowance of losses on normal retirement
shall be applied to such assets in the same manner as though the assets had
been accounted for in multiple asset accounts using a rate based upon average
expected useful life.
(b) Where a
taxpayer has a large number of depreciable assets and depreciation is based on
the average useful life of such assets, then, whether such assets are similar
or dissimilar and regardless of whether they are accounted for in individual
asset accounts or multiple asset accounts the allowance of losses on the normal
retirement of such assets would distort income. Such distortion would result
from the fact that the use of average useful life (and, accordingly, average
rate) assumes that while some assets normally will be retired before the
expiration of the average life, others normally will be retired after
expiration of the average life. Accordingly, if instead of accounting for a
large number of similar or dissimilar depreciable assets in multiple asset
accounts, the taxpayer chooses to account separately for such assets, using a
rate based upon the average life of such assets, the rules with respect to the
allowances of losses on normal retirements will be applied to such assets in
the same manner as though the assets were accounted for in multiple asset
accounts using a rate based upon average expected useful life.
(c) Where a taxpayer who does not have a
large number of depreciable assets (and who therefore is not subject to
subparagraph (b) of this paragraph) chooses to set up a separate account for
each such asset, and has sought to compute an average life for such assets on
which to base its depreciation deductions (so that it uses the same life for
each account), allowance of losses on normal retirement from such accounts may
in some situations substantially distort income. Such distortion would result
from the fact that the use of average useful life (and, accordingly, average
rate) assumes that while some assets normally will be retired before expiration
of the average life, others normally will be retired after expiration of the
average life. Accordingly, where a taxpayer chooses to account separately for
such assets instead of accounting for them in multiple asset accounts, and the
result is to substantially distort his income, the rules with respect to the
allowance of losses on normal retirements shall be applied to such assets in
the same manner as though the assets had been accounted for in multiple asset
accounts using a rate based upon average expected useful life.
(d) Whenever a taxpayer is treated under this
paragraph as though its assets were accounted for in a multiple asset account
using an average life rate, and, therefore, it is denied a loss on retirements,
the unrecovered cost less salvage of each asset which was accounted for
separately may be amortized in accordance with the rule stated in paragraph
(5)(a)(ii) of this regulation.
(5) Accounting Treatment of Asset
Retirements.
(a) In the case of a normal
retirement where under the foregoing rules no loss is recognized and where the
asset is retired without disposition or abandonment, (i) if the asset was
contained in a multiple asset account, the full cost of such asset reduced by
estimated salvage, shall be charged to the depreciation reserve, or (ii) if the
asset was accounted for separately, the unrecovered cost or other basis, less
salvage, of the asset may be amortized through annual deductions from gross
income in amounts equal to the unrecovered cost or other basis of such asset,
divided by the average expected useful life (not the remaining useful life)
applicable to the asset at the time of retirement. For example, if an asset is
retired after six years of use and at the time of retirement depreciation was
being claimed on the basis of an average expected useful life of 10 years, the
unrecovered cost or other basis less salvage would be amortized through equal
annual deductions over a period of 10 years from the time of
retirement.
(b) Where multiple
asset accounts are used and acquisitions and retirements are numerous, if a
taxpayer, in order to avoid unnecessarily detailed accounting for individual
retirements, consistently follows the practice of charging the reserve with the
full cost or other basis of assets retired and of crediting it with all
receipts from salvage, the practice may be continued so long as, in the opinion
of the Franchise Tax Board, it clearly reflects income. Conversely, where the
taxpayer customarily follows a practice of reporting all receipts from salvage
as ordinary taxable income such practice may be continued so long as, in the
opinion of the Franchise Tax Board, it clearly reflects income.
__________
* Except for the deletion of references in the federal regulation to new methods of computing depreciation this regulation is substantially the same as Section 26 CFR 1.167(a)-8.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.