Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 12A-19.073 - Use of Enhanced Zip Code Method to Assign Service Addresses to Local Taxing Jurisdictions
(1) An enhanced
zip code method is a method of assigning service addresses to local taxing
jurisdictions based on United States postal zip codes of at least nine
digits.
(2) A communications
services dealer may avoid liability as provided in Rule
12A-19.070, F.A.C., for any
additional local communications services tax, penalty, and interest resulting
from errors in assigning service addresses to an incorrect local taxing
jurisdiction when the correct local taxing jurisdiction has a higher local tax
rate by employing an enhanced zip code method only if the requirements of this
rule are satisfied.
(3)
(a) When the area covered by the enhanced zip
code is not entirely located within the same local taxing jurisdiction as the
post office, dealers or vendors providing databases are not permitted to
presume that all service addresses within the enhanced zip code are sitused to
the same local taxing jurisdiction. In some cases, the area included in an
enhanced zip code overlaps local jurisdictional boundaries or is outside the
local taxing jurisdiction where the post office to which a zip code is assigned
is located. In addition, a dealer may provide services to customer service
addresses for which an enhanced zip code is not available, because the service
address is in a rural area or is without postal delivery. The dealer or the
vendor must use a reasonable methodology that accurately assigns service
addresses to the correct local taxing jurisdictions in such circumstances. The
dealer or vendor will be considered to have used a reasonable methodology if it
relies on information obtained from one or more of the following sources:
1. The Address/Jurisdiction Database,
described in Rule 12A-19.071, F.A.C.;
2. A database that has been certified by the
Department as provided in Rule
12A-19.072, F.A.C.;
3. Representatives of relevant local taxing
jurisdictions whose responsibilities entail knowledge of the location of
addresses as within or without their jurisdictions;
4. The United States Census Bureau;
or
5. The United States Postal
Service.
(b) The dealer
must maintain records that establish the methodology used to assign service
addresses as provided in this subsection.
(4) The dealer employing an enhanced zip code
method to assign service addresses to local jurisdictions must satisfy the
notification and due diligence requirements set forth in paragraphs (2)(b) and
(c) of Rule 12A-19.070, F.A.C. For purposes
of due diligence requirements, a communications services dealer or an enhanced
zip code database vendor is deemed to have expended reasonable resources to
accurately and reliably implement an enhanced zip code method if the
requirements of subsection (3) have been met. The due diligence requirement
includes the requirement to correct errors in the assignments of service
addresses within 120 days of discovering or being notified by any person of
such errors. The database vendor or dealer must also maintain adequate internal
controls to assure the on-going accuracy of an enhanced zip code database as
described in subparagraph (2)(c)1. of Rule
12A-19.070, F.A.C.
(5) Mobile communications services providers
using an enhanced zip code method are subject to the safe harbor provisions of
Title 4 United States Code (U.S.C.) s. 120, including the termination of the
safe harbor provided by that section. Such providers will be held harmless from
liability for additional local communications services tax, penalty, and
interest resulting from erroneous assignments of customer service addresses to
local taxing jurisdictions as provided in the federal Mobile Telecommunications
Sourcing Act. On May 23, 2003, the Department provided notice, as required by
Title 4 U.S.C. s.
119(b), that the Department
of Revenue's Address/Jurisdiction Database complies with the formatting
requirements of Title 4 U.S.C. s. 19(a)(2) of the Mobile Telecommunications
Sourcing Act.
(6) In order to be
entitled to the .75 percent collection allowance, a communications services
dealer that employs an enhanced zip code method to assign service addresses
must satisfy the requirements of subsection (3) of this rule and the
requirements of subsection (3) of Rule
12A-19.070,
F.A.C.
Notes
Rulemaking Authority 202.26(3)(b), (f), (g), 202.28(1) FS. Law Implemented 202.22(1), (4), (6), (7), 202.28(1)(b)2. FS.
New 11-14-05.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.