Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 67-21.018 - [Effective 7/10/2025] Refundings and Troubled Development Review
(1) Refunding
of previously issued Bonds shall in all instances be at the option of the
Corporation and not an obligation of the Corporation.
(2) The Corporation shall endeavor where
feasible to refund Bonds which are either in default or face a pending
default.
(3) Approval by the
Corporation for a refunding of an issue of Bonds for reasons related to pending
default shall be subject to the following:
(a)
Determination of the likelihood of the impending default;
(b) Submission of a sworn certificate of
impending default by the owner or Credit Enhancer;
(c) Submission of sworn certificate from the
owner or Credit Enhancer that conditions causing default are likely to
continue;
(d) Submission of
certified information from a certified public accountant concerning cash
contributions to the Development, financial condition of the Development,
including analysis of tax benefits derived from Development losses, and the
financial condition of the owner or Credit Enhancer;
(e) Independent evidence of market conditions
in the Development location;
(f)
Evidence of effort by the owner or Credit Enhancer to procure other sources of
capital infusion;
(g) Statement by
the owner or Credit Enhancer of the continued public purpose to be achieved by
refunding;
(h) Agreement by the
owner or Credit Enhancer to update the MMRB Land Use Restriction Agreement,
including retention of state and federal income limits;
(i) New Credit Underwriting by the
Corporation, with new Bond amount determined by the Corporation based upon real
estate underwriting criteria and equal to the lesser of the amount determined
by the Corporation or the Credit Enhancer, to provide assurance that a similar
default condition will not present itself in the future;
(j) The full risk of refunding is taken by
the Credit Enhancer through full indemnification of the Corporation; with
consideration given to personal indemnification from the owner if sufficient
financial strength can be demonstrated;
(k) All costs of refunding are paid by the
owner or the Credit Enhancer outside of Bond proceeds, including all applicable
fees;
(l) Retention of annual fees
by the Corporation;
(m) Provision
of other evidence of the immediacy of default;
(n) Retention of the Credit Enhancement, or
an acceptable non-Credit Enhancement structure; and,
(o) Management of the Development is reviewed
and approved by the Corporation.
(4) In connection with all refundings, the
following shall apply:
(a) All outstanding
fees of the Corporation and any of its assigned professionals shall be paid in
connection with the refunding;
(b)
The set-asides required by the original MMRB Land Use Restriction Agreement
shall be increased by an amount and extended for a period determined by the
Corporation. With regard to said determination, the Corporation shall consider
the facts and circumstances, inclusive of each Applicant's request, in
evaluating whether the changes made are prejudical to the Development or to the
market to be served by the Development;
(c) A Credit Underwriting Report shall be
required, which may incorporate any Credit Underwriting undertaken within the
past twelve months in connection with a transfer of ownership of the same
Development;
(d) A guarantee of
recourse obligations and an environmental indemnity shall be
required;
(e) Additional operating
deficit or other guarantees and establishment of replacement reserves or
increase in existing reserves may be required as specified in the Credit
Underwriting Report;
(f) The MMRB
Loan shall, on the earlier of 24 months after closing or stabilized occupancy
in the case of major rehabilitation, begin full amortization over the remaining
life of the Bonds; and in no event shall it exceed the economic remaining life
of the property, provided that, in the case of a refunding relating to a
pending financial default, such amortization may be delayed to the extent
recommended in the Credit Underwriting Report;
(g) Any material changes to the underlying
documents shall be deemed to constitute a refunding for purposes
hereof;
(h) Any extension or
extensions of maturity cumulatively exceeding 60 months shall be deemed to
constitute a refunding for purposes hereof; and,
(i) The owner of the Development must provide
a written request for the refunding and a detailed opinion from Applicant's
counsel describing the scope of the transaction. It shall not be necessary to
complete an Application in connection with a refunding request.
Notes
Rulemaking Authority 420.507(12), 420.508(3)(c) FS. Law Implemented 420.507, 420.508, 420.509 FS.
New 1-7-98, Formerly 9I-21.018, Amended 1-26-99, 11-14-99, 2-11-01, 3-17-02, Repromulgated 4-6-03, 3-21-04, Amended 2-7-05, Repromulgated 1-29-06, 4-1-07, 3-30-08, 8-6-09, 11-7-11, Amended 7-16-13, Repromulgated 2-2-15, 9-15-16, 5-24-17, 7-8-18, 7-11-19, 6-23-20, 5-18-21, 7-6-22, 6-28-23.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.