Fla. Admin. Code Ann. R. 68-1.008 - Due Process Procedures
(1) Summary of Due
Process Procedures: The due process procedures adopted by the Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FWC) are designed to satisfy Article IV, Section 9,
Florida Constitution, and to address the recommendations in Section
20.331(9)(a)(b) and
(c), F.S. (1999). The procedures adopted by
the FWC are adequate within the meaning of the constitution because the
procedures fully comply with the applicable procedural and substantive due
process provisions of Chapter 120, F.S., and its companion provisions, the
Uniform Rules of Procedure. As to rules promulgated under the FWC's
constitutional authority, there are adequate judicial remedies to adjudicate
such rules and provide due process of law. With respect to FWC proposed rules
to list or delist species as endangered, threatened or of special concern, the
FWC has adopted an additional procedure, not required by law, which assures
that any party shall receive a special hearing, known as a "draw-out, " before
an Administrative Law Judge as to the phase one part of the listing process,
and that such special "draw-out" hearing shall suspend the rule. FWC rulemaking
authority over endangered marine species, such as manatees and sea turtles, is
derived from the legislature and adjudication of proposed rules on these
species is subject to Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
(2) Background: Article IV, Section 9,
Florida Constitution, as amended by Constitution Revision Commission Revision
5, as adopted in 1998, created the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
(FWC) to exercise the state's regulatory and executive authority with respect
to wild animal life and freshwater aquatic life and to exercise executive and
regulatory authority with respect to marine life. The issue of due process is
specifically addressed in Revision 5 which states that the Commission shall
establish procedures to ensure adequate due process in the exercise of its
regulatory and executive functions. Due process is also addressed in the
"merger bill" which implements Revision 5. See, Chapter 99-245, Laws of
Florida, now codified in pertinent part as Section
20.331, F.S. While this law does
not mandate that any particular due process procedure must be followed by FWC,
it provides several recommendations in Sections
20.331(6)(a)-(c),
F.S. First, it states that FWC shall implement a system of adequate due process
procedures to be accorded to any party, as defined in Section
120.52, F.S., whose substantial
interests will be affected by any action of the Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission in the performance of its constitutional duties or responsibilities.
Second, the legislation encourages the commission to incorporate in its process
the provisions of Section
120.54(3)(c),
F.S., when adopting rules in the performance of its constitutional duties or
responsibilities. Third, the provisions of Chapter 120, F.S., shall be accorded
to any party whose substantial interests will be affected by any action of the
commission in the performance of its statutory duties or responsibilities. For
purposes of this subsection, statutory duties or responsibilities include, but
are not limited to, the following:
(a)
Research and management responsibilities for marine species listed as
endangered, threatened, or of special concern, including, but not limited to,
manatees and marine turtles;
(b)
Establishment and enforcement of boating safety regulations;
(c) Land acquisition and
management;
(d) Enforcement and
collection of fees for all recreational and commercial hunting or fishing
licenses or permits;
(e) Aquatic
plant removal and management using fish as a biological control
agent;
(f) Enforcement of penalties
for violations of commission rules, including, but not limited to, the seizure
and forfeiture of vessels and other equipment used to commit those
violations;
(g) Establishment of
free fishing days;
(h) Regulation
of off-road vehicles on state lands;
(i) Establishment and coordination of a
statewide hunter safety course;
(j)
Establishment of programs and activities to develop and distribute public
education materials;
(k) Police
powers of wildlife and marine officers;
(l) Establishment of citizen support
organizations to provide assistance, funding, and promotional support for
programs of the commission;
(m)
Creation of the Voluntary Authorized Hunter Identification Program; and,
(n) Regulation of required
clothing of persons hunting deer.
(3) The commission is directed to provide a
report on the development and implementation of its adequate due process
provisions to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, and the appropriate substantive committees of the House of
Representative and the Senate no later than December 1, 1999.
(4) In compliance with the constitution and
the "merger bill, " the FWC, at its inaugural meeting in Ft. Lauderdale, on
July 7, 1999, approved and adopted due process procedures which address and
satisfy the constitutional requirement and legislative recommendations.
Accordingly, the FWC submitted its Due Process Procedures to the Legislature on
December 1, 1999, in compliance with Section 20.231, F.S. (1999).
(5) Due Process Procedures Adopted by the
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
(a)
Article IV, Section 9, Constitution of Florida, as amended by Revision 5 and as
approved by the electorate in November 1998, requires that "The (Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation) Commission shall establish procedures to ensure
adequate due process in the exercise of its executive and regulatory
functions." The following due process procedures of the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) approved and adopted by the Commission
on July 7, 1999, are designed to provide adequate due process, in compliance
with Article IV, Section 9, Florida Constitution, as amended, and to address
the special recommendations on due process of Section
20.331, F.S. (1999).
(b) Procedural Due Process: Procedural due
process, in a broad sense, encompasses the procedural requirements that must be
observed in the course of a legal proceeding to ensure the protection of
private rights and property. Procedural due process, in an administrative
setting, consists of requirements for notice, a meaningful opportunity to be
heard and a fair, impartial decision-making authority.
1. The FWC has adopted, by Rule
68-1.001, F.A.C., The Uniform
Rules of Procedure, and shall follow Chapter 28, F.A.C., as the rules of
procedure for the FWC. The Uniform Rules of Procedure are a companion to the
APA and shall govern the practical and procedural aspects of agency action on
the following subjects:
a. Statement of agency
organization,
b. Scheduling of
meetings and workshops,
c.
Decisions determining substantial interests,
d. Petitions for declaratory
statements,
e. Summary
proceedings,
f.
Mediation,
g. Bid
challenges,
h. Waivers and
variances.
2. The FWC
shall follow Chapter 120, F.S., the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), for
all notices of FWC meetings and workshops.
3. The FWC shall follow the APA for all
notices of FWC rule development and rulemaking.
4. The FWC shall follow the APA in the use of
rule development workshops and shall prepare statements of estimated regulatory
cost and statements of lower cost regulatory alternative in accordance with the
APA.
5. The FWC shall comply with
the Public Records Act (Chapter 119, F.S.) with respect to all records of the
FWC and with the Sunshine Law with respect to meetings of the FWC.
6. The FWC due process procedures shall be
accorded to any party as defined in Section
120.52, F.S., whose substantial
interests will be affected by any action of the FWC.
(c) Substantive Due Process: Substantive due
process refers to constitutional protections provided by the due process clause
of the Florida and Federal Constitution. Therefore, substantive due process
applies with respect to the decisions, orders and adjudications of government.
1. The FWC rules derived from constitutional
authority are not to be subject to administrative rule challenges under Section
120.56, F.S. See,
Airboat Association of Florida. Inc. v. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission, 498 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986). Under the APA, The FWC
is not defined as an agency except when it is acting pursuant to statutory
authority derived from the Legislature. See, Section
120.52(1)(b),
F.S. However, rules derived from constitutional authority can be challenged in
a number of ways:
a. The FWC rules, and
possible proposed rules, derived from constitutional authority may be
challenged directly before the circuit court by declaratory action, injunctive
action or, in appropriate circumstances, under the Bert J. Harris Private
Property Rights Protection Act (Section
70.001, F.S.). Decisions of the
circuit court can be appealed to the appropriate District Court of Appeal, and
potentially to the Supreme Court of Florida.
b. The FWC rules derived from constitutional
authority which carry a criminal or non-criminal sanction can, upon issuance of
a citation, be challenged in county court. Decisions of the county court can be
appealed to the circuit court, or, in some cases, directly to the District
Court of Appeal.
c. FWC proposed
rules derived from constitutional authority may also be subject to a special
hearing, known as a "draw-out" hearing. See, Section
120.54(3)(c),
F.S. A "draw-out" is a special hearing which may be provided upon request of a
party if the agency determines that the rulemaking proceeding is inadequate to
protect the person's substantial interests and that the normal public hearing
on a proposed rule does not provide that person with an adequate opportunity to
protect their interests. The FWC, just as any other state agency, may consider,
on a case by case basis, requests for use of a "draw-out" for proposed rules
promulgated in performance of its constitutional duties in accordance with the
statutory criteria.
2.
The FWC rules which are derived from statutory authority are fully subject to
administrative rule challenges under Section
120.56, F.S. See Section
20.331, F.S.
3. All discretionary actions, orders, or
decisions of the FWC which affect substantial interests are subject to
adjudication under Chapter 120, F.S. Accordingly, to the extent that agency
action is discretionary, FWC action to grant or deny permits or licenses or to
suspend or revoke such permits or licenses is subject to adjudication under
Sections 120.57,
120.569 and
120.60, F.S. These discretionary
decisions to grant or deny permits or licenses or to revoke or suspend such
permits or licenses include, but are not limited to, the following subjects:
a. Bid disputes,
b. Commercial fishing licenses,
c. Restricted species endorsements,
d. Salt water products licenses,
e. Marine special activity
licenses,
f. Captive wildlife
permits,
g. Permits to take, remove
or relocate wildlife, including wildlife listed as endangered, threatened or of
special concern,
h. Permits to take
freshwater fish, marine life, manatees, sea turtles or wildlife for educational
or scientific purposes,
i. Permits
to operate alligator farms and management programs,
j. Permits to operate game fish aquaculture
facilities,
k. Permits to operate
haul seines in Lake Okeechobee.
4. The FWC shall also comply with the
following provisions of law that assure adequate due process relating to
various actions of the Commission.
a. FWC
comments to other permitting agencies: If another agency relies upon
recommendations of the FWC in granting or denying a license or permit, the FWC
may be required to appear as a party in any legal challenge brought on such
license or permit to show that the recommendation is within the FWC
jurisdiction and is valid. See, Section
120.60(7), F.S.
In addition, such recommendations or comments must be based upon credible,
factual scientific data, are not binding on any permitting agency, must be
submitted within a strict 30-day deadline, and the FWC must bear its costs in
defending its recommendation. See, Section
20.331(7), F.S.
(1999).
b. Alteration of hunting or
fishing seasons: Agency action which has the effect of altering the established
hunting or fishing seasons, or altering the established annual harvest limits
for saltwater fishing is not a rule if the procedure for altering such harvest
limits is set out by rule of the FWC. Such action shall be adequately noticed
in the area affected through publishing in a newspaper of general circulation
or through notice by broadcasting via electronic media. Section
120.81(5),
F.S.
c. Personnel and disciplinary
actions: When FWC acts to suspend, reduce in pay, transfer, and layoff, demote
or dismiss any permanent employee in the Career Service System; the employee
shall have appeal rights to the Public Employees Relations Commission. Section
447.207(8),
F.S.
(d)
Additional Due Process Procedures by use of the draw-out procedure of Section
120.54(3)(c),
F.S.: Section 20.331(9)(b),
F.S., recommends that the FWC consider the use of the "draw out" procedure of
Section 120.54(3)(c),
F.S., in the performance of its constitutional duties. Accordingly, FWC shall
require that upon timely request, a party shall receive a special "draw out"
hearing conducted by an administrative law judge on proposed rules that list or
delist fish or wildlife as endangered, threatened or of species of special
concern, during the phase one process for listing or delisting such species.
This draw-out will only be used specifically for phase one of the new listing
process, as created by rule amendments approved by the GFC at its May 14, 1999
meeting. (See, Appendix; FWC rule sections governing the list and delisting of
species). The "phase one" stage of the listing process determines if a species
warrants a classification as endangered, threatened or of special concern, or,
if the species is already classified, whether the species should be
re-classified or removed from the list. The "phase two" stage deals with the
specific conservation needs of the species, such as additional regulations or
management. The draw-out process is appropriate for the "phase one" aspect of
the listing process for a number of reasons: First, determining whether a
species warrants classification or whether its classification should change is
a decision which must be based upon credible biological data and therefore, an
evidentiary hearing, such as a draw-out, may be useful. Secondly, phase one of
the listing process deals with whether a species qualifies for higher level of
protection or management and therefore, the decision should be factually
correct and afforded special care and deliberation. Finally, listing affects a
broad constituency and may significantly affect land-use decisions by other
levels or agencies of government, including the federal government, and
accordingly, an extra level of care and deliberation is appropriate. The effect
of a draw-out is to suspend any proposed rule until the completion of the
draw-out proceeding. The draw-out proceeding consists of a hearing before an
administrative law judge, the preparation of a record and the transmittal to
and review of the record by the FWC. The draw-out is an evidentiary hearing
only; there are no recommended findings of fact or conclusions of law and the
draw-out record is not binding on the FWC nor is subject to appeal. It should
be noted that the use of a special draw-out in these circumstances goes beyond
what is legally required of state agencies under the draw-out provision of
Section 120.54(3)(c),
F.S. Under the statute, the use of a draw-out is left to the discretion of the
state agencies, and is decided on a case by case basis.
(e) Due Process relating to marine species
that are endangered, threatened or of special concern, and turtles and
manatees: Under the merger bill, research and management responsibilities for
marine species listed as endangered or threatened, including marine turtles and
manatees, is a statutory responsibility that has been delegated to FWC. See;
Section 20.331(6)(c)1., F.S. (1999), and Section
379.2401(4)(a),
F.S. (1999). Under the bill, the FWC can only promulgate rules pertaining to
endangered or threatened marine species if specifically authorized by the
statutes. These provisions of the merger bill were the subject of a complaint
in the case Caribbean Conservation Corporation and Save the Manatee Club. Inc.
et al. v. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, et al., Case No.
99-4188 (Circuit Court for the Second Judicial Circuit, Leon County). This
complaint alleges that parts of merger bill encroach upon the Commission's
constitutional authority and violate the recently amended version of Article
IV, Section 9, of the Florida Constitution. Currently, the FWC is enjoined from
complying with the merger bill. Therefore, until such time as a court order to
the contrary is entered, FWC rules or proposed rules promulgated with respect
to endangered or threatened marine species, including the West Indian manatee
and sea turtles, shall be subject to APA administrative appeal procedures under
Section 120.56, F.S. (1999). On January
16, 2003, the Supreme Court of Florida upheld the Legislative bill (Chapter
99-245, Laws of Florida) which implemented FWC. In this ruling, the Supreme
Court concluded that endangered and threatened marine species such as the
Florida manatee, whales and sea turtles were not regulated by FWC under the
Florida Constitution. FWC's authority to regulate these species was derived not
from the constitution but from statute (Section
379.2431, F.S.). Therefore, the
Administrative Procedures Act (Chapter 120, F.S.) applied in all respects to
rulemaking for these species. See, Save the Manatee Club, et al v. FWC,
838 So.2d 492 (Fla. 2003).
Notes
Rulemaking Authority Article IV, Sec. 9, Fla. Const. Law Implemented Art. IV, Sec. 9, Fla.Const. 20.331(9) FS.
New 1-8-08.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.