Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. R. 391-3-8-.09 - Standards for the Design and Evaluation of Dams
(1) The design and/or evaluation of new and
existing dams shall conform to accepted practices of the engineering profession
and dam safety industry. Design manuals, evaluation guidelines, and procedures
used by the following agencies can be considered as acceptable design or
evaluation references, except as those references differ from Georgia Law and
these regulations:
(a) U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers;
(b) Natural Resources
Conservation Service;
(c) U.S.
Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation;
(d) Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
(2) Other
design and evaluation methods may be used to demonstrate compliance with the
objectives of these rules, but are subject to the approval of the
Director.
(3) Design and Evaluation
of Dams under paragraph (1) and (2) above shall, as a minimum, consider the
following basic principles:
(a) All dams must
be stable under all conditions of construction and/or operation of the
impoundment. Details of stability evaluation shall be submitted to the Director
for approval. Analyses using the methods, guidelines and procedures of the
agencies listed in paragraph (1) yielding the following Minimum Safety Factors
can be considered as acceptable stability:
1.
Earthen Embankments
(i) End of Construction:
1.3
(ii) Steady State Seepage:
1.5
(iii) Steady State Seepage with
Seismic Loading: 1.1
(iv) Rapid
Drawdown (Upstream): 1.3
(v)
Submerged Toe with Rapid Drawdown: 1.3
2. Concrete Structures (cohesion included)
(i) Normal Reservoir: 3.0
(ii) Normal Reservoir with Seismic Loading:
1.0
(iii) Design Flood:
2.0
(b)
Details of the engineering evaluation of material properties in the dam or
appurtenant structures shall be submitted to the Director for review and
approval. Conservative selections for soil strength values shall be used for
analyses or evaluations. Details of any foundation investigation and laboratory
testing supporting assumed design or evaluation parameters shall be included
for review.
(c) All dams and
appurtenant structures shall be capable of withstanding seismic accelerations
defined in the most current "Map for Peak Acceleration with a 2% exceedance in
50 years" for the contiguous United States published by the United States
Geological Survey (NEHRP maps). The minimum seismic acceleration shall be
.050 g. The seismic accelerations may be reduced or
seismic evaluation eliminated if the applicant's engineer can successfully
demonstrate to the Director by engineering analyses or judgment that smaller
seismic accelerations are appropriate or no seismic evaluation is
needed.
(d) All dams shall have a
means of draining the reservoir to a safe level as demonstrated by the
applicant's engineer. The submittal by the applicant's engineer shall include
the computation of the maximum time required to drain the reservoir. Exceptions
to this rule may be given by the Director based on an engineering evaluation
demonstrating the lack of this capability would not endanger the
public.
(e) All earthen embankments
shall be protected from surface erosion by appropriate vegetation, or some
other type of protective surface such as riprap or paving, and shall be
maintained in a safe condition. Examples of appropriate vegetation include, but
are not limited to, Bermuda, Tall Fescue, Centipede grasses and Lespedeza
sericea. Inappropriate vegetation on existing dams such as trees shall be
removed only after consultation with the Division or other qualified persons on
the proper procedures for removal. Hedges and small shrubs may be allowed on
existing dams if they do not obscure inspection or interfere with the operation
and maintenance of the dam.
(f)
Design Storm. Each dam shall be capable of safely passing the fraction of the
flood developed from the PMP hydrograph depending on the subclassification of
the dam. The design storm for each subclassification of a dam is as follows:
1. Small Dam: 25 percent PMP
2. Medium Dam: 33.3 percent PMP
3. Large Dam: 50 percent PMP
4. Very Large Dam: 100 percent PMP
5. Based on visual inspection and detailed
hydrologic and hydraulic evaluation, including documentation of completed
design and construction procedures, up to a 10 percent lower design storm
requirement (22.5, 30, 45, or 90 percent) may be accepted on existing Public
Law 566(PL-566), including Resource Conservation & Development structures,
and Public Law 534(PL-534) Project Dams at the discretion of the Director,
provided the project is in an acceptable state of maintenance. The design storm
requirement may be reduced on existing dams if the applicant's engineer can
successfully demonstrate to the Director, by engineering analysis, that the dam
is sufficient to protect against probable loss of human life downstream at a
lesser design storm. Earthen emergency spillways shall not function until the
50 year storm.
(g)
Seepage Control. All dams shall be able to prevent the development of
instability due to excessive seepage forces, uplift forces, or loss of
materials in the embankment, abutments, spillway areas, or foundation. For new
dams, seepage analysis for design, and inspection during construction, shall be
in sufficient detail to prevent the occurrence of critical seepage gradients.
1. For new dams, the design shall include a
seepage control method that meets the minimum acceptable safety standards, as
determined by the Division. All internal drainage systems with pipe collection
systems shall have cleanouts.
2. In
existing dams, seepage shall be investigated by an engineer and appropriate
control measures shall be taken as necessary.
(h) Monitoring Devices.
1. Monitoring devices, including but not
limited to piezometers, settlement plates, telltale stakes, seepage outlets and
weirs, and permanent bench marks may be required by the Director for use in the
inspection and monitoring of the safety of a dam during operation.
2. Where appropriate for new or existing
dams, a reservoir filling monitoring and surveillance plan to be implemented
during reservoir filling or re-filling shall be submitted to the Director for
approval prior to start of filling or re-filling.
(i) Design Life. The design life for new dams
and reservoirs shall be adequate for the dams and reservoirs to perform
effectively as planned, as determined by the following criteria:
1. The time required to fill the reservoir
with sediment from the contributing watershed; and
2. The durability of appurtenances and
materials used to construct the dams.
(j) Freeboard. Appropriate freeboard for wave
action shall be considered by an engineer through engineering analysis. The
required freeboard shall be provided above the maximum reservoir surface
elevation that would result from the inflow from the design storm for the
structure. The resulting maximum reservoir surface elevation plus freeboard
shall determine the elevation of the top of the dam. In lieu of determining the
appropriate amount of freeboard by engineering analysis, a minimum of three (3)
feet of freeboard shall be provided on earthen dams.
(k) Existing concrete and/or masonry dams and
appurtenant structures shall be structurally sound and shall have joints free
of trees and other vegetation and shall show no signs of significant structural
deterioration such as excessive cracks, spalling, efflorescence and exposed
reinforcing steel.
(4)
Other design standards may be imposed as deemed appropriate by the Director
after review of design of new structures or through a visual inspection of an
existing structure conducted pursuant to Rule
391-3-8-.08(2)(b)
of these regulations, or based on a review of the detailed engineering study
prepared by an engineer.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.