Haw. Code R. § 12-53-23 - Motion for summary decision
(a) Any party may,
at least thirty days before the date fixed for any hearing under subchapter 3
of this chapter, move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary
decision on all or any part of the proceeding. Any other party may, within ten
days after service of the motion, serve opposing affidavits or countermove for
summary decision. The presiding hearing examiner may, at his or her discretion,
set the matter for argument and call for the submission of briefs.
(b) The filing of any documents pursuant to
subsection (a) above shall be with the hearing examiner, and copies of any
documents shall be served in accordance with section 12-53-13.
(c) The hearing examiner may grant the motion
pursuant to section 12-53-24 if the pleadings, affidavits, material obtained by
discovery or otherwise obtained, or matters officially noticed show that there
is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to
summary decision. The hearing examiner may deny the motion whenever the moving
party denies access to information by means of discovery to a party opposing
the motion.
(d) Affidavits shall
set forth the facts as would be admissible in evidence in a proceeding under
chapter 91, HRS, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to
testify. When a motion for summary decision is made and supported as provided
in this section a party opposing the motion may not rest upon the mere
allegations or denials of his or her pleading but shall respond by setting
forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of fact for the
hearing.
(e) Should it appear from
the affidavits of a party opposing the motion that, for reasons stated, facts
essential to justify the opposition cannot be presented, the hearing examiner
may deny the motion for summary decision, order a continuance to permit
affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make another
order.
(f) The denial of all or any
part of a motion for summary decision by the hearing examiner shall not be
subject to interlocutory appeal to the director unless the hearing examiner
certifies in writing that the ruling involves an important question of law or
policy as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and
that an immediate appeal from the ruling may materially advance the ultimate
termination of the proceeding. The allowance of an interlocutory appeal shall
not stay the proceeding before the hearing examiner unless the director, or
designee, shall so order.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.