Haw. Code R. § 12-57-11 - Arbitration or other agency proceedings
(a) General.
(1) An employee who files a complaint under
section
396-8(e),
HRS, may concurrently pursue remedies under grievance arbitration proceedings
provided by collective bargaining agreements. In addition, the complainant may
concurrently resort to other agencies for relief, such as the National Labor
Relations Board. Nothing in section
396-8(e),
HRS, shall preclude an employee or representative of an employee from
simultaneously pursuing a cause of action for injunctive relief or any other
remedy provided by law. The director's jurisdiction to investigate complaints
under section
396-8(e),
HRS, and to determine whether discrimination has occurred is independent of the
jurisdiction of other agencies or bodies.
(2) The director recognizes the national
policy favoring voluntary resolution of disputes under procedures in collective
bargaining agreements.
(3) Where a
complainant is in fact pursuing remedies other than those provided by section
396-8(e),
HRS, postponement of the director's determination and deferral to the results
of such proceedings may be in order.
(b) Postponement of determination.
Postponement of determination would be justified where the rights asserted in
other proceedings are substantially the same as rights under section
396-8(e),
HRS, and those proceedings are not likely to violate the rights guaranteed by
section
396-8(e),
HRS. The factual issues in such proceedings must be substantially the same as
those raised by the section
396-8(e),
HRS, complaint, and the forum hearing the matter must have the power to
determine the ultimate issue of discrimination.
(c) Deferral to outcome of other proceedings.
A determination to defer to the outcome of other proceedings initiated by a
complainant must necessarily be made on a case-to-case basis after careful
scrutiny of all available information. Before deferring to the results of
another proceeding it must be clear that the proceeding dealt adequately with
all factual issues, that the proceeding was fair, regular, and free of
procedural infirmities, and that the outcome of the proceeding was not
repugnant to the purpose and policy of section
396-8(e),
HRS. In this regard, if such other action initiated by a complainant is
dismissed without an adjudicatory hearing, such dismissal will not ordinarily
be regarded as determinative of the section
396-8(e),
HRS, complaint.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.