a)
Establishment of Peer Review Program
1)
Pursuant to Section 16(e) of the Act, the Division establishes a Peer Review
Program to monitor a CPA firm's and sole practitioner's compliance with
applicable accounting, auditing and other attestation standards adopted by
generally recognized standard-setting bodies. The program may include
education, remediation, disciplinary sanctions or other corrective action in
which performance does not comply with professional or regulatory
standards.
2) The Division shall
not require any CPA firm or sole practitioner to become a member of any Peer
Review Administrator.
b)
Standards for Peer Reviews
The Division adopts the AICPA Standards for Performing and
Reporting on Peer Reviews (2017, no later amendments or editions apply) and
related Interpretations (2018, no later amendments or editions apply), 1211
Avenue of the Americas, New York NY 10036-8775, for reviews commencing on or
after January 1, 2009, and, for public company audit firms, the firm inspection
standards required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) ( 18 USC 7201 et
seq.) as its minimum standards for review.
c) Peer Review Administrators
1) The Division, upon recommendation of the
Committee, approves the following as Qualified Peer Review Administrators:
A) The AICPA;
B) The AICPA National Peer Review
Committee;
C) The
Society;
D) Other state CPA
societies;
E) Other organizations
that are fully involved in the administration of the AICPA Peer Review Program;
and
F) The Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
2) A Peer Review Administrator not listed in
subsection (c)(1) shall submit an application to the Division, on forms
provided by the Division, to receive authorization to act as a Peer Review
Administrator.
3) To qualify as a
Peer Review Administrator, an entity must annually submit a peer review plan of
administration to the Division for review and approval. The plan of
administration must:
A) Establish a PRRC, and
subcommittees as needed, and provide professional staff as needed for the
operation of the peer review program;
B) Establish a program to communicate to CPA
firms and sole practitioners participating in the peer review program the
latest developments in peer review standards and the most common findings in
the peer reviews conducted by the Peer Review Administrator;
C) Establish procedures for resolving any
disagreement that may arise out of the performance of a peer review;
D) Establish procedures to resolve matters
that may lead to the dismissal of a CPA firm or sole practitioner from the peer
review program;
E) Establish
procedures to evaluate and document the performance of each reviewer, which may
lead to the disqualification of a reviewer who does not meet the AICPA
standards;
F) Require the
maintenance of records of peer reviews conducted under the program in
accordance with the record retention rules of the AICPA; and
G) Provide reports on the results of the peer
review program to the Division upon request.
4) A Peer Review Administrator shall submit
its plan of administration on forms provided by the Division. Peer Review
Administrators set forth in subsection (c)(1) are exempt from the plan of
administration submission requirements.
5) A Peer Review Administrator is subject to
oversight by the Division for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the
Act.
d) Enrollment and
Participation
1) For renewals on or after July
1, 2012, satisfactory completion of a peer review is required as a condition
for renewal of a license for each CPA firm or sole practitioner who performs
accountancy activities outlined in Section 8.05(a)(1) of the Act. For purposes
of this Section, satisfactory completion shall be defined as follows:
A) Peer reviews of CPA firms and sole
practitioners that are accepted by the PRRC without remedial or corrective
actions shall be considered completed when accepted.
B) Peer reviews of CPA firms and sole
practitioners that are accepted by the PRRC subject to any identified remedial
or corrective actions shall be considered accepted on the date the CPA firm or
sole practitioner signs an acceptance letter from the PRRC agreeing to complete
the remedial or corrective actions and shall be considered completed when the
CPA firm or sole practitioner completes the remedial or corrective actions to
the satisfaction of the PRRC. The Division may grant renewal of a CPA firm's or
sole practitioner's license upon the acceptance of its peer review, rather than
upon the completion of its peer review.
C) Pursuant to Section 16(g) of the Act, the
Division may hold a hearing for any CPA firm or sole practitioner that fails to
satisfactorily complete a peer review or comply with any remedial or corrective
actions determined necessary by the PRRC.
2) Each CPA firm or sole practitioner
required to participate under Section 16(e) of the Act shall be enrolled in the
program of an approved Peer Review Administrator and shall comply with the
review due date assigned by an approved Peer Review Administrator. It is the
responsibility of the CPA firm or sole practitioner required to complete a peer
review to schedule and satisfactorily complete a peer review prior to the
expiration date set for renewal. Failure to schedule a peer review with an
approved Peer Review Administrator in sufficient time to enable the Peer Review
Administrator to accept the review, as determined by the Peer Review
Administrator, by the renewal date shall not constitute an excuse for failure
to satisfactorily complete the peer review required for renewal.
3) The Division, in its discretion, may
accept extensions granted by the Peer Review Administrator to complete a
review. Extensions exceeding 3 months beyond the original due date established
by the Peer Review Administrator must be approved by the Division and only for
reasonable cause. Reasonable cause shall be determined on an individual basis
by the Division and be defined as an inability to fulfill the peer review
requirements during the applicable prerenewal period due to:
A) Full-time service by a sole practitioner
in the Armed Forces of the United States of America during a substantial part
of the prerenewal period;
B) A
temporary incapacitating illness of a sole practitioner documented by a
statement from a currently licensed physician;
C) Undue hardship (including, but not limited
to, prolonged hospitalization, family illness, CPA firm dissolution or
reorganization); or
D) Other
similar extenuating circumstances.
4) A CPA firm or sole practitioner may choose
from among the list of Qualified Peer Review Administrators in subsection (c)
to administer its peer review; but must comply with all requirements of the
Peer Review Administrator in which it is enrolled.
5) A CPA firm or sole practitioner choosing
to change to another Peer Review Administrator may do so provided that the CPA
firm or sole practitioner authorizes the previous Peer Review Administrator to
communicate to the succeeding Peer Review Administrator any outstanding
corrective actions related to the CPA firm's or sole practitioner's most recent
review. Any outstanding actions must be corrected and the peer review
satisfactorily completed in accordance with subsections (d)(1)(A) and (B) prior
to transfer between Peer Review Administrators.
6) An out-of-state CPA firm practicing in
this State pursuant to a practice privilege provided for in Section 5.2(d) of
the Act must comply with the peer review program of the state in which the CPA
firm is licensed.
7) An
out-of-state CPA firm practicing in this State pursuant to a practice privilege
provided for in Section 5.2(d) of the Act from a state without a peer review
program must comply with the peer review requirements set forth in Section
16(e) of the Act.
8) An
out-of-state CPA firm practicing in this State pursuant to a practice privilege
provided for in Section 5.2(d) of the Act must submit proof of satisfactory
completion of a peer review (or equivalent) at the request of the
Division.
9) In the event a CPA
firm's or sole practitioner's practice is sold, dissolved or merged with the
practice of one or more CPA firms or sole practitioners, determination of
successor or predecessor CPA firms, peer review year-end and peer review due
date, if any, will be determined by the Peer Review Administrator.
e) Effect of Successive
Substandard Reviews
1) CPA firms and sole
practitioners enrolled in a Peer Review Program are required under the AICPA
Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews to cooperate with the
Peer Reviewer, Peer Review Administrator, PRRC, and AICPA Peer Review Board or
its equivalent in all matters related to the review that could impact the CPA
firm's or sole practitioner's enrollment in the program.
2) If a CPA firm or sole practitioner
receives a system or engagement review with a peer review rating of pass with
deficiencies or fail, the Peer Review Administrator shall send notification to
the CPA firm or sole practitioner, or its successor, via certified mail, or
other delivery method providing proof of receipt, that failure to receive a
report rating of pass on its next system or engagement review may be deemed
failure to cooperate under subsections (e)(3) and (4).
3) If a CPA firm or sole practitioner, or its
successor, receives two consecutive system or engagement reviews with a peer
review rating of pass with deficiencies or fail, the Peer Review Committee
shall assess whether the CPA firm or sole practitioner, or its successor, has
failed to cooperate in all matters related to the review.
4) If a CPA firm or sole practitioner, or its
successor, is deemed to have failed to cooperate, the Peer Review Committee may
refer the CPA firm or sole practitioner, or its successor, to the AICPA Peer
Review Board, or its equivalent, to consider whether a hearing should be held
regarding the CPA firm's or sole practitioner's, or its successor's,
termination from the Peer Review Program.
5) If a CPA firm or sole practitioner, or its
successor, is deemed to have cooperated in all matters related to the review,
the CPA firm or sole practitioner, or its successor, shall complete any
required remedial or corrective actions to the satisfaction of the PRRC and
undergo another peer review within 31/2 years after the due date of the prior
review.
6) If a CPA firm or sole
practitioner, or its successor, receives a third consecutive peer review rating
of pass with deficiencies or fail, the Peer Review Committee shall refer the
CPA firm or sole practitioner, or its successor, to the AICPA Peer Review
Board, or its equivalent, to consider whether a hearing will be held regarding
the CPA firm's or sole practitioner's, or its successor's termination from the
Peer Review Program.
7) The
Division, in its discretion, may require any CPA firm or sole practitioner that
has received a report with a peer review rating of pass with deficiencies or
fail to be subject to remedial action as determined by the Division.
f) PRRC Qualifications and
Responsibilities
1) PRRC members are subject
to the qualifications and have the responsibilities outlined in the AICPA
Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews and related
guidance.
2) Each PRRC member must
comply with the confidentiality requirements of Section 16(f)(2) of the Act.
The Peer Review Administrator may annually require its PRRC members to sign a
statement acknowledging their appointments and the responsibilities and
obligations of their appointments.
g) Division Access to Results of CPA Firm's
or Sole Practitioner's Peer Reviews
1) A CPA
firm or sole practitioner shall submit the following peer review documents
promptly upon Division request:
A) Peer
review report;
B) Letter of
response, if applicable;
C)
Acceptance letter;
D) Letter signed
by the reviewed CPA firm accepting the peer review documents with the
understanding that the CPA firm agrees to take certain actions, if applicable;
and
E) Letter notifying the
reviewed CPA firm that certain required actions have been completed, if
applicable.
2) To comply
with the Division's request in subsection (g)(1), the Peer Review Administrator
for CPA firms or sole practitioners shall post the documents listed in
subsection (g)(1) within 45 days after the Division's request to the AICPA
Facilitated State Board Access website, to which the Division shall have
access.
3) Documents received under
this Section are subject to the confidentiality provisions stated in the
Act.
h) The Division may
consider the recommendation of the Public Accountant Registration and Licensure
Committee regarding peer review in the State of Illinois.