a) Lending
Agencies - When Liable For Tax
Finance companies and other lending agencies are not relieved
from liability for tax in cases in which they engage in the business of selling
to users or consumers tangible personal property to which they hold or acquire
title. Except as provided in subsection (b), when a lending agency transfers
title to a repossessed car to a user, the lending agency is engaging in the
business of selling tangible personal property at retail and incurs Retailers'
Occupation Tax (ROT) liability on its receipts from those sales. It shall be
registered as a retailer under the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act and shall file
returns and otherwise comply with that Act.
b) Lending Agencies - When Not Liable For Tax
1) Finance companies and other lending
agencies are engaged primarily in the business of financing or acquiring the
promissory notes given by purchasers of automobiles, furniture, refrigerators
or other items of tangible personal property.
2) To guarantee payment of these promissory
notes, lending agencies sometimes take as security chattel mortgages upon the
tangible personal property. When the purchaser of the automobile or other
tangible personal property fails to meet its obligation, the lending agency
repossesses the property and sells it to satisfy the obligation evidenced by
the notes. In connection with these sales, the lending agency acts as agent for
the owner of the repossessed property if the owner is known or disclosed to the
purchaser and if the lending agency does not take title to the property; the
lending agency, under these circumstances, is not liable for payment of any ROT
with respect to the proceeds from these sales.
3) Even if the lending agency does title a
repossessed motor vehicle in its name, if the original buyer, after the
expiration of the redemption period provided for in the Retail Installment
Sales Act [815 ILCS 405 ], is granted permission to redeem and to resume
possession of the vehicle and to continue performance under the buyer's
original installment contract without any change in the terms of the contract,
and the lending agency re-endorses the repossession title to the original
buyer, the transaction is not regarded as a sale and so is not
taxable.
c) Installment
Sales
1) When a retailer of tangible personal
property sells an installment contract or "paper" to a third party, the
difference between the selling price of the tangible personal property and the
selling price of the installment contract or "paper" is a cost of doing
business and is therefore not deductible in computing ROT liability. ROT is
measured by the total selling price of the tangible personal property purchased
from the retailer for use or consumption. Upon sale of the installment contract
or "paper" to a third party, ROT becomes due based on the entire selling price
to the purchaser of the tangible personal property, with credit allowed for any
tax already remitted to the Department based on the receipts from the sale of
the tangible personal property. As an illustration, a computer vendor enters
into an installment sales contract with a business for a computer system. The
selling price of the computer system is $120,000 and the contract requires
monthly installment payments of $10,000 for one year. After the business makes
the first payment, the computer vendor sells the installment contract to a bank
for $90,000. Upon the sale of the installment contract to the bank, the
computer vendor incurs ROT on $120,000 (the entire selling price to the
original purchaser), with credit allowed for the tax that was remitted on the
first $10,000 payment made by the business.
2) For purposes of this Section, "paper"
means any instrument of indebtedness that was acquired by the retailer from the
purchaser of the tangible personal property. Sales of "paper" to a third party
includes the sale of accounts receivable as well as assignments or sales of the
actual instruments of indebtedness themselves.
d) Bad Debts
1) Definitions. For purposes of this
subsection (d):
A) "Bad debt" means any
portion of a debt arising from a taxable sale at retail that is:
i) found to be worthless or
uncollectible;
ii) has been charged
off in the retailer's or lender's books and records; and
iii) has, except as provided in subsections
(d)(2)(F) and (G), been claimed as a deduction pursuant to the Internal Revenue
Code, U.S. Code: Title 26. For information on calculation of the bad debt
deduction see subsection (d)(4).
B) "Retailer" means a person who
holds itself out as being engaged (or who habitually engages)
in selling tangible personal property at retail with respect to such sales and
includes a retailer's affiliates.
C) "Lender" means a person, or an
affiliate, assignee, or transferee of that person, who owns or has owned a
private-label credit card account or an interest in a private-label credit card
receivable that the person purchased directly from a retailer who remitted the
tax imposed under the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act; originated pursuant to
that person's contract with the retailer who remitted the tax imposed under the
Retailers' Occupation Tax Act; or acquired from a third
party.
D) "
Private-label Credit Card" means a charge card or credit card that
carries, refers to, or is branded with the name or logo of a retailer and may
only be used to make purchases from that retailer or that retailer's
affiliates.
E) "
Affiliate" means an entity affiliated under section
1504 of the Internal Revenue Code, or an
entity that would be an affiliate under that section had the entity been a
corporation. [
35 ILCS 120/6d ]
2) Bad Debt Claimed by Retailers
A) In case a retailer repossesses any
tangible personal property and subsequently resells that property to a
purchaser for use or consumption, the retailer's gross receipts from that sale
are subject to ROT. The retailer is entitled to a bad debt credit with respect
to the original sale in which the default has occurred to the extent to which
it has paid ROT on a portion of the price that the retailer does not collect,
or that the retailer is not permitted to retain because of being required to
make a repayment of that portion to a lending agency under a "with recourse"
agreement.
B) Retailers of tangible
personal property other than motor vehicles, watercraft, trailers and aircraft
that must be registered with an agency of this State may obtain this bad debt
credit by taking a deduction on the returns they file with the Department for
the month in which the federal income tax return or amended federal income tax
return on which the receivable is written off is filed, or by filing a claim
for credit as provided in subsection (d)(2)(E).
C) Because retailers of motor vehicles,
watercraft, trailers and aircraft do not pay ROT to the Department on retail
sales of motor vehicles, watercraft, trailers and aircraft with monthly
returns, but remit the tax to the Department on a transaction by transaction
basis, they are unable to take a deduction on the returns that they file with
the Department, but may file a claim for credit with the Department, as
provided in subsections (d)(2)(E), (F), (G) and (d)(5)(B) on any transaction
with respect to which they desire to receive the benefit of the repossession
credit.
D) Retailers who incur bad
debt on any tangible personal property that is not repossessed may also obtain
bad debt credit as provided in subsections (d)(2)(A), (E), (F) and
(G).
E) In the case of tax paid on
an account receivable that becomes a bad debt, the tax paid becomes a tax paid
in error, for which a claim for credit may be filed in accordance with Section
6 of the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act, on the date that the federal income tax
return or amended return on which the receivable, including as provided in
subsections (d)(2)(F) and (G), is written off is filed.
F) Ordinarily, a deduction for uncollectible
debts is allowed only for a retailer who uses the gross sales (accrual) method
of accounting to keep its books and records and to file its federal income tax
and sales and use tax returns. However, in the limited situation in which a
cash basis retailer has prepaid the tax, such retailer is allowed to claim a
bad debt deduction if the debt:
i) has been
found to be worthless or uncollectible; and
ii) would be eligible to be both charged off
in the retailer's books and records and claimed as a deduction under the
Internal Revenue Code if the retailer had kept accounts on an accrual
basis.
G) Likewise,
retailers who use the gross sales method for filing their sales tax returns,
but who file their income tax returns on a cash basis are allowed to claim a
bad debt deduction if the debt:
i) has been
found to be worthless or uncollectible; and
ii) has been charged off in the retailer's
books and records and would be eligible to be claimed as a deduction under the
Internal Revenue Code on the income tax return filed by the retailer if its
income tax return was not filed on the cash basis.
EXAMPLE: ABC Auto Inc. reports on the cash method of
accounting and is in the business of making retail sales of automobiles. On
occasion, ABC Auto Inc. will itself finance sales for some of its customers and
pay the full amount of sales tax upfront so that its customers can obtain
license plates. In 2020, ABC Auto Inc. financed a sale to a customer and paid
the sales tax upfront. The customer never made a payment, and in 2021 the debt
was found to be worthless. If ABC Auto Inc. reported on the accrual method, the
debt would be eligible to be both charged off as a bad debt in the retailer's
books and records and claimed as a deduction pursuant to the Internal Revenue
Code. Therefore, ABC Auto Inc. can file a claim for the sales taxes it paid
out-of-pocket to the Department. For purposes of filing a claim with the
Department, the bad debt will be considered claimed as a deduction pursuant to
the Internal Revenue Code on the 2021 income tax return filed byABC Auto
Inc.
H) For
information on claiming a deduction or refund for tax previously paid, see
subsection (d)(5).
3)
Private-label Credit Cards - Bad Debt on and after July 31, 2015
A) On and after July 31, 2015,
with
respect to the payment of taxes on purchases made through a private-label
credit card, if consumer accounts or receivables are found to be worthless or
uncollectible, the retailer may claim a deduction on a return in an amount
equal to, or may obtain a refund of, the tax remitted by the retailer on the
unpaid balance due if:
i)
the
accounts or receivables have been charged off as bad debt on the lender's books
and records on or after January 1, 2016;
ii)
the accounts or receivables have
been claimed as a deduction pursuant to Section
166 of the Internal Revenue Code on the
federal income tax return filed by the lender; and
iii)
a deduction was not previously
claimed and a refund was not previously allowed on that portion of the account
receivable.
B)
The deduction or refund allowed under subsection (d)(3)(A):
i)
does not apply to credit sale
transaction amounts resulting from purchases of titled
property;
ii)
includes only those credit sale transaction amounts that represent
purchases from the retailer whose name or logo appears on the private-label
credit card used to make those purchases;
iii)
may only be taken by the
taxpayer, or its successors, that filed the return and remitted tax on the
original sale on which the deduction or refund claim is based;
and
iv)
includes
all credit sale transaction amounts eligible under subsection
(d)(3)(B)(ii) that are outstanding with respect to the specific
private-label credit card account or receivable at the time the account or
receivable is charged off, regardless of the date the credit sale transaction
actually occurred.
4) Bad Debt Calculation
A) If the amount of an account found to be
worthless is comprised in part of nontaxable receipts, such as interest,
insurance, and other charges exempt from sales or use tax, and in part of
taxable receipts upon which tax has been paid, a bad debt deduction may be
claimed only with respect to the unpaid amount upon which tax has been
paid.
B) Accounts found to be
worthless include receivables written off as uncollectible by a retailer or
lender who uses the bad debt reserve method or allowance for doubtful account
method of recognizing bad debt expenses pursuant to the Internal Revenue
Code.
C) No deduction is allowed
for expenses incurred in attempting to enforce collection of any account
receivable, or repossession expenses.
D) No deduction is allowed for payments of
late fees, and other penalty charges that occur when customers do not comply
with the terms of the sales contract.
E) The fair market value of repossessed
property is not factored into a bad debt calculation.
F) For purposes of computing the deduction or
refund, payments on the accounts or receivables shall be prorated against the
amounts outstanding on the accounts or receivables. For information on claiming
a deduction or refund using an alternative method, see subsection (d)(4)(G).
i) For revolving credit loans involving
private label credit cards, retailers may calculate the uncollectible taxable
amount by applying the percentage of charges that went to taxable purchases to
the outstanding balance on the account.
Example: ABC Retailer Inc. allows customers to finance
purchases using a private label credit card. During the time the card was
active, the customer had the following charges added to the customer's
account:
|
Charge
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
|
Taxable Merchandise:
|
$10,000
|
87.7 %
|
|
IL State and local sales taxes:
|
$800
|
7.0 %
|
|
Interest fees:
|
$500
|
4.4 %
|
|
Late fees:
|
$100
|
0.9 %
|
|
Total:
|
$11,400
|
|
The outstanding balance at the time of the charge off was
$1,000. Applying the 87.7% merchandise proration percentage to the $1,000
charge off amount results in an uncollectible taxable amount of $877. (The
merchandise proration percentage is calculated by dividing the charge item
amount by the total charge amount).
ii) For installment loans, the formula for
calculating the uncollectible taxable amount is the unpaid balance when the
receivable is charged off divided by the total amount of the finance contract
multiplied by the taxable amount financed.
Example: XYZ Auto Inc. sells an automobile for $20,000. The
tax due on the sale at 6.25 % is $1,250. The customer makes a $1,000 down
payment and finances the remaining amount of the purchase price plus the sales
taxes through XYZ Auto Inc. The applicable loan details are as follows:
|
Total Amount Financed:
|
$20,250
|
|
Taxable Amount Financed:
|
$19,000
|
|
Total Interest Payments:
|
$10,000
|
|
Total Finance Contract:
|
$30,250
|
The customer makes $5,000 in payments but then stops paying
with the unpaid balance of the total finance contract being $25,250. ($30,250 -
$5,000). XYZ Auto Inc. determines the loan is uncollectible. The uncollectible
taxable amount is calculated as follows:
|
Uncollectible Taxable Amount
|
=
|
(unpaid balance when charged off / total amount of
the finance contract) x taxable amount financed
|
|
Uncollectible Taxable Amount
|
=
|
$25,250/$30,250 x $19,000
|
|
Uncollectible Taxable Amount
|
=
|
$15,860
|
G) The Department may allow an alternative
method of substantiating the deduction or refund where the volume and character
of the uncollectible accounts would warrant use of alternative computations and
the Department finds that, subject to the provisions of this Section, the
method used fairly and equitably
i) prorates
the taxable and nontaxable elements of a bad debt; and
ii) computes the amount of sales tax imposed
and remitted with respect to the taxable charges remaining unpaid on the bad
debt.
H) In situations
where the books and records of the retailer or lender support an allocation of
the bad debt allowance among multiple states, an allocation of the bad debt is
allowed between Illinois and the other state or states.
5) Bad Debt Procedural Requirements - Record
Keeping - Limitations
A) Retailers of tangible
personal property other than motor vehicles, watercraft, trailers, and aircraft
that must be registered with an agency of this State may obtain this bad debt
credit by taking a deduction on the returns they file with the Department for
the month in which the federal income tax return or amended federal income tax
return on which the receivable is written off is filed. Failure to take the
deduction on the proper return will not in itself prevent the allowance of a
deduction or refund provided an amended return for that month or claim for
refund is filed with the Department within the statute of limitations as
provided in subsections (d)(2)(A) and (B).
i)
When a retailer who uses the bad debt reserve or allowance for doubtful account
method of recognizing bad debt expenses takes a deduction on the federal income
tax return prior to writing off the receivable in its books and records, the
retailer may take a deduction on the return filed with the Department for the
month in which the federal income tax return or amended federal income tax
return covering the period in which the receivable is written off in its books
and records is filed.
ii) If the
bad debt deduction exceeds the amount of the taxable sales on the Form ST-1
return for the period in which the retailer's federal income tax return is
filed or amended, the taxpayer is allowed to carry forward the unclaimed
portion of the bad debt deduction and apply it to succeeding Form ST-1 returns
until it has been deducted in its entirety.
iii) Any amount of a bad debt deduction taken
that is subsequently collected by the retailer, in whole or part, shall be
included in the first return filed after the collection, and the tax shall be
paid with the return.
B)
Because retailers of motor vehicles, watercraft, aircraft, and trailers do not
pay Retailers' Occupation Tax to the Department on retail sales of motor
vehicles, watercraft, trailers and aircraft with monthly returns, but remit the
tax to the Department on a transaction-by-transaction basis, they are unable to
take a deduction on the returns that they file with the Department but instead
may file a claim for credit with the Department, as provided in Section 6 of
the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act, using Form ST-557, available at
https://tax.illinois.gov/.
C)
The retailer and lender shall
maintain adequate books, records or other documentation supporting the charge
off of the accounts or receivables for which a deduction was taken or a refund
was claimed under Sections 6 or 6d of the Retailers' Occupation Tax
Act, including, but not limited to, a copy of that part of the federal
return on which the deduction was claimed, including any supporting statements
or schedules.
D)
If a retailer or lender does not charge off an account receivable that is found
to be worthless or uncollectible as a bad debt in its books and records and
does not claim a deduction pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code on its federal
income tax return or amended return, or, for cash basis retailers, the account
receivable would not be eligible to be claimed as a deduction pursuant to the
Internal Revenue Code on its federal income tax return or amended return if the
retailer or lender filed a federal income tax return on an accrual basis, the
tax paid on that bad debt or receivable will not be considered a tax paid in
error. Thus, the retailer will not be able to file a deduction or claim for
credit in accordance with Sections 6 or 6d of the Retailers' Occupation Tax
Act.
E)
For purposes of the
deduction or refund allowable under Section 6d of the Retailers' Occupation Tax
Act, the limitations period for claiming the deduction or refund shall be the
same as the limitations period set forth in Section 6 of the Retailers'
Occupation Tax Act for filing a claim for credit, and shall commence on the
date that the accounts or receivables have been claimed as a bad debt deduction
pursuant to section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code on the
federal income tax return filed by the lender, regardless of the date on which
the sale of the tangible personal property actually occurred.
[
35 ILCS
120/6d ].