Iowa Admin. Code r. 161-4.13 - Disqualification
(1) A presiding
officer or other person shall withdraw from participation in the making of any
proposed or final decision in a contested case if that person:
a. Has a personal bias or prejudice
concerning a party or a representative of a party;
b. Has personally investigated, prosecuted or
advocated in connection with that case, the specific controversy underlying
that case, another pending factually related contested case, or a pending
factually related controversy that may culminate in a contested case involving
the same parties;
c. Is subject to
the authority, direction or discretion of any person who has personally
investigated, prosecuted or advocated in connection with that contested case,
the specific controversy underlying that contested case, or a pending factually
related contested case or controversy involving the same parties;
d. Has acted as counsel to any person who is
a private party to that proceeding within the past two years;
e. Has a personal financial interest in the
outcome of the case or any other significant personal interest that could be
substantially affected by the outcome of the case;
f.Has a spouse or relative within the third
degree of relationship that:
(1) is a party
to the case, or an officer, director or trustee of a party;
(2) is a lawyer in the case;
(3) is known to have an interest that could
be substantially affected by the outcome of the case; or
(4) is likely to be a material witness in the
case; or
g. Has any
other legally sufficient cause to withdraw from participation in the decision
making in that case.
(2)
The term "personally investigated" means taking affirmative steps to interview
witnesses directly or to obtain documents or other information directly. The
term "personally investigated" does not include general direction and
supervision of assigned investigators, unsolicited receipt of information which
is relayed to assigned investigators, review of another person's investigative
work product in the course of determining whether there is probable cause to
initiate a proceeding, or exposure to factual information while performing
other agency functions, including fact gathering for purposes other than
investigation of the matter which culminates in a contested case. Factual
information relevant to the merits of a contested case received by a person who
later serves as presiding officer in that case shall be disclosed if required
by 1998 Iowa Acts, chapter 1202, section 19(3), and subrules 4.13(3) and
4.14(8).
(3) In a situation where a
presiding officer or other person knows of information which might reasonably
be deemed to be a basis for disqualification and decides voluntary withdrawal
is unnecessary, that person shall submit the relevant information for the
record by affidavit and shall provide for the record a statement of the reasons
for the determination that withdrawal is unnecessary.
(4) If a party asserts disqualification on
any appropriate ground, including those listed in subrule 4.13(1), the party
shall file a motion supported by an affidavit pursuant to 1998 Iowa Acts,
chapter 1202, section 19(7). The motion must be filed as soon as practicable
after the reason alleged in the motion becomes known to the party. If, during
the course of the hearing, a party first becomes aware of evidence of bias or
other grounds for disqualification, the party may move for disqualification but
must establish the grounds by the introduction of evidence into the record.
If the presiding officer determines that disqualification is appropriate, the presiding officer shall withdraw. If the presiding officer determines that withdrawal is not required, the presiding officer shall enter an order to that effect. A party asserting disqualification may seek an interlocutory appeal under rule 161-4.25(17A).
(5) Remittal of disqualification. A presiding
officer disqualified by the terms of 4.13(1)"e" or " f
" may, instead of withdrawing from the proceeding, disclose, either in
writing or orally, on the record the basis of the disqualification. If, based
on such disclosure, the parties and lawyers, independently of the
administrative adjudicator's participation, all agree in writing that the
adjudicator's relationship is immaterial or that the adjudicator's financial
interest is insubstantial, the adjudicator is no longer disqualified, and may
participate in the proceeding. The agreement, signed by all parties and
lawyers, shall be incorporated in the record of the proceeding.
(6) Partial disqualification of commission.
The disqualification of one or more members of the commission who are
considering adoption of a proposed decision of the presiding officer shall not
prevent the remaining commissioners from considering the proposed
decision.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.