Iowa Admin. Code r. 161-4.14 - Ex parte communication
(1)
Prohibited communications. Unless required for the disposition of ex parte
matters specifically authorized by statute, following issuance of the notice of
hearing, there shall be no communication, directly or indirectly, between the
presiding officer and any party or representative of any party or any other
person with a direct or indirect interest in such case in connection with any
issue of fact or law in the case except upon notice and opportunity for all
parties to participate. This does not prohibit persons jointly assigned to
render a proposed or final decision or to make findings of fact or conclusions
of law in the contested case from communicating with each other Nothing in this
provision is intended to preclude the presiding officer from communicating with
members of the agency or seeking the advice or help of persons other than those
with a personal interest in, or those engaged in personally investigating as
defined in subrule 4.13(2), prosecuting, or advocating in, either the case
under consideration or a pending factually related case involving the same
parties as long as those persons do not directly or indirectly communicate to
the presiding officer any ex parte communications they have received of a type
that the presiding officer would be prohibited from receiving or that furnish,
augment, diminish, or modify the evidence in the record.
(2) Prohibitions on ex parte communications
commence with the issuance of the notice of hearing in a contested case and
continue for as long as the case is pending.
(3) Written, oral or other forms of
communication are "ex parte" if made without notice and opportunity for all
parties to participate.
(4) To
avoid prohibited ex parte communications notice must be given in a manner
reasonably calculated to give all parties a fair opportunity to participate.
Notice of written communications shall be provided in compliance with rule
161-4.6
(17A) and may be supplemented by telephone, facsimile, electronic mail or other
means of notification. Where permitted, oral communications may be initiated
through conference telephone call including all parties or their
representatives.
(5) Persons who
jointly act as presiding officer in a pending contested case may communicate
with each other without notice or opportunity for parties to
participate.
(6) Communications
with the presiding officer involving uncontested scheduling or procedural
matters do not require notice or opportunity for parties to participate.
Parties should notify other parties prior to initiating such contact with the
presiding officer when feasible, and shall notify other parties when seeking to
continue hearings or other deadlines pursuant to rule
161-4.11
(17A).
(7) Disclosure of prohibited
communications. A presiding officer who receives a prohibited ex parte
communication during the pendency of a contested case must initially determine
if the effect of the communication is so prejudicial that the presiding officer
should be disqualified. If the presiding officer determines that
disqualification is warranted, a copy of any prohibited written communication,
all written responses to the communication, a written summary stating the
substance of any prohibited oral or other communication not available in
written form for disclosure, all responses made, and the identity of each
person from whom the presiding officer received a prohibited ex parte
communication shall be submitted for inclusion in the record under seal by
protective order If the presiding officer determines that disqualification is
not warranted, such documents shall be submitted for inclusion in the record
and served on all parties. Any party desiring to rebut the prohibited
communication must be allowed the opportunity to do so upon written request
filed within ten days after notice of the communication.
(8) Promptly after being assigned to serve as
presiding officer at any stage in a contested case proceeding, a presiding
officer shall disclose to all parties material factual information received
through ex parte communication prior to such assignment unless the factual
information has already been or shortly will be disclosed pursuant to Iowa Code
section
17A.13(2)
or through discovery. Factual information
contained in an investigative report or similar document need not be separately
disclosed by the presiding officer as long as such documents have been or will
shortly be provided to the parties.4.14(9) The presiding officer
may render a proposed or final decision imposing appropriate sanctions for
violations of this rule including default, a decision against the offending
party, censure, or suspension or revocation of the privilege to practice before
the agency. Violation of ex parte communication prohibitions by agency
personnel shall be reported to the executive director for possible sanctions
including censure, suspension, dismissal, or other disciplinary
action.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.