Iowa Admin. Code r. 265-7.6 - Presiding officer
(1) In
each contested case in which Iowa Code chapter I7A requires an evidentiary
hearing, the chairperson of the authority will determine whether the hearing
shall be held before the authority , one or more members of the authority 's
board, or an administrative law judge. Any party who wishes to request that the
presiding officer assigned to render a proposed decision be an administrative
law judge employed by the department of inspections and appeals must file a
written request within 20 days after service of a notice of hearing which
identifies or describes the presiding officer as the authority 's board or
members of the authority 's board.
(2) The executive director may deny the
request only upon a finding that one or more of the following apply:
a. Neither the authority nor any officer of
the authority under whose authority the contested case is to take place is a
named party to the proceeding or a real party in interest to that
proceeding.
b. There is a
compelling need to expedite issuance of a final decision in order to protect
the public health, safety, or welfare.
c. The case involves significant policy
issues of first impression that are inextricably intertwined with the factual
issues presented.
d. The demeanor
of the witnesses is likely to be dispositive in resolving the disputed factual
issues.
e. Funds are unavailable to
pay the costs of an administrative law judge and an interauthority
appeal.
f. The request was not
timely filed.
g. The request is not
consistent with a specified statute.
(3) The executive director shall issue a
written ruling specifying the grounds for its decision within 20 days after a
request for an administrative law judge is filed. If the ruling is contingent
upon the availability of an administrative law judge with the qualifications
identified in subrule 7.6(4), the parties shall be notified at least 10 days
prior to hearing if a qualified administrative law judge will not be
available.
(4) An administrative
law judge assigned to act as presiding officer in any of the authority 's cases
shall have the following technical expertness unless waived by the
authority .
(5) Except as provided
otherwise by another provision of law, all rulings by an administrative law
judge acting as presiding officer are subject to appeal to the board of the
authority . A party must seek any available intra-authority appeal in order to
exhaust adequate administrative remedies.
(6) Unless otherwise provided by law, members
of the authority 's board, when reviewing a proposed decision upon
intra-authority appeal, shall have the powers of and shall comply with the
provisions of this chapter which apply to presiding officers.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.