Iowa Admin. Code r. 283-2.9 - Variance between adopted rule and published notice of proposed rule adoption
(1) The commission
shall not adopt a rule that differs from the rule proposed in the Notice of
Intended Action on which the rule is based unless:
a. The differences are within the scope of
the subject matter announced in the Notice of Intended Action and are in
character with the issues raised in that notice; and
b. The differences are a logical outgrowth of
the contents of that Notice of Intended Action and the comments submitted in
response thereto; and
c. The Notice
of Intended Action provided fair warning that the outcome of that rule-making
proceeding could be the rule in question.
(2) In determining whether the Notice of
Intended Action provided fair warning that the outcome of that rule-making
proceeding could be the rule in question, the commission shall consider the
following factors:
a. The extent to which
persons who will be affected by the rule should have understood that the
rule-making proceeding on which it is based could affect their
interests;
b. The extent to which
the subject matter of the rule or the issues determined by the rule are
different from the subject matter or issues contained in the Notice of Intended
Action; and
c. The extent to which
the effects of the rule differ from the effects of the proposed rule contained
in the Notice of Intended Action.
(3) The commission shall commence a
rule-making proceeding within 60 days of its receipt of a petition for rule
making seeking the amendment or repeal of a rule that differs from the proposed
rule contained in the Notice of Intended Action on which the rule is based,
unless the commission finds that the differences between the adopted rule and
the proposed rule are so insubstantial as to make such a rule-making proceeding
unnecessary. A copy of any such finding and the petition to which it responds
shall be sent to petitioner, the administrative rules coordinator, and the
administrative rules review committee within three days of its
issuance.
(4) Concurrent
rule-making proceedings. Nothing in this rule disturbs the discretion of the
commission to initiate, concurrently, several different rule-making proceedings
on the same subject with several different published Notices of Intended
Action.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.