Iowa Admin. Code r. 641-33.27 - Ex parte communication
(1) Unless
requested for the disposition of ex parte matters specifically authorized by
statute, following issuance of the statement of charges and notice of hearing
there shall be no communication, directly or indirectly, between the presiding
officer and any party or representative of any party or any other person with a
direct or indirect interest in such case in connection with any issue of fact
or law in the case except upon notice and opportunity for all parties to
participate. Nothing in this provision is intended to preclude board members
from communicating with other board members or members of the board staff,
other than those with a personal interest in, or those engaged in personally
investigating as defined in subrule 33.11(2), prosecuting, or advocating in,
either the case under consideration or a pending factually related case
involving the same parties, as long as those persons do not directly or
indirectly communicate to the presiding officer any ex parte communications
they have received of a type that the presiding officer would be prohibited
from receiving or that furnish, augment, diminish, or modify the evidence in
the record.
(2) Prohibitions on ex
parte communications commence with the issuance of the statement of charges and
notice of hearing in a contested case and continue for as long as the case is
pending before the board .
(3)
Written, oral, or other forms of communication are "ex parte" if made without
notice and opportunity for all parties to participate.
(4) To avoid prohibited ex parte
communications, notice must be given in a manner reasonably calculated to give
all parties a fair opportunity to participate. Notice of written communications
will be provided in compliance with rule
641-33.14 (17A) and may be
supplemented by telephone, facsimile, electronic mail, or other means of
notification. When permitted, oral communications may be initiated through
conference telephone call including all parties or their
representatives.
(5) Persons who
jointly act as a presiding officer in a pending contested case may communicate
with each other without notice or opportunity for parties to
participate.
(6) The executive
officer or other persons may be present during deliberations as long as the
executive officer or other person is not disqualified from participating
pursuant to rule 641-33.11 (17A).
(7) Communications with the presiding officer
involving uncontested scheduling or procedural matters do not require notice or
opportunity for parties to participate. Parties should notify other parties
prior to initiating such contact with the presiding officer when feasible, and
shall notify other parties when seeking to continue hearings or other deadlines
pursuant to rule 641-33.22 (17A).
(8) A presiding officer who receives a
prohibited ex parte communication during the contested case process must
initially determine if the effect of the communication is so prejudicial that
the presiding officer should be disqualified.
a. If the presiding officer determines that
disqualification is warranted, a copy of any prohibited written communication,
all written responses to the communication, a written summary stating the
substance of any prohibited oral or other communication not available in
written form for disclosure, all responses made, and the identity of each
person from whom the presiding officer received a prohibited ex parte
communication shall be submitted for inclusion in the record under seal by
protective order.
b. If the
presiding officer determines that disqualification is not warranted, such
documents will be submitted for inclusion in the record and served on all
parties. Any party desiring to rebut the prohibited communication must be
allowed the opportunity to do so upon written request filed within ten days
after notice of the communication.
(9) Promptly after being assigned to serve as
presiding officer at any stage in a contested case proceeding, a presiding
officer shall disclose to all parties material factual information received
through ex parte communication prior to such assignment, unless the factual
information has already been or shortly will be disclosed pursuant to Iowa Code
section 17A.13(2) or
through discovery. Factual information contained in an investigative report or
similar document need not be separately disclosed by the presiding officer as
long as such documents have been or will shortly be provided to the
parties.
(10) The presiding officer
may render a proposed or final decision imposing appropriate sanctions for
violations of this rule including default, a decision against the offending
party , censure, or suspension or revocation of the privilege to practice before
the board . Violation of ex parte communications prohibitions by board personnel
will be reported to the board and the board 's executive officer for possible
sanctions, including censure, suspension, dismissal, or other disciplinary
action.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.