Iowa Admin. Code r. 653-25.7 - Presiding officer in a nondisciplinary contested case
(1) A "nondisciplinary contested case"
includes license denial proceedings. Any party in a nondisciplinary contested
case, including an appeal of a denial of licensure, who wishes to request that
the presiding officer assigned to render a proposed decision be an
administrative law judge employed by the department of inspections and appeals
must file a written request within 20 days after service of a statement of
charges which identifies or describes the presiding officer as the
board.
(2) The board may deny the
request only upon a finding that one or more of the following apply:
a. There is a compelling need to expedite
issuance of a final decision in order to protect the public health, safety, or
welfare.
b. An administrative law
judge with the qualifications identified in subrule 25.7(4) is unavailable to
hear the case within a reasonable time.
c. The case involves significant policy
issues of first impression that are inextricably intertwined with the factual
issues presented.
d. The demeanor
of the witnesses is likely to be dispositive in resolving the disputed factual
issues.
e. Funds are unavailable to
pay the costs of an administrative law judge and an interagency
appeal.
f.The request was not
timely filed.
g. The request is not
consistent with a specified statute.
(3) The board shall issue a written ruling
specifying the grounds for its decision within 20 days after a request for an
administrative law judge is filed. If the ruling is contingent upon the
availability of an administrative law judge with the qualifications identified
in subrule 25.7(4), the parties shall be notified at least 10 days prior to
hearing if a qualified administrative law judge will not be
available.
(4) An administrative
law judge assigned to act as presiding officer in a nondisciplinary contested
case shall have a juris doctorate degree.
(5) Except as provided otherwise by another
provision of law, all rulings by an administrative law judge acting as
presiding officer in a nondisciplinary contested case are subject to appeal to
the board. A party must seek any available intra-agency appeal in order to
exhaust adequate administrative remedies. Such appeals must be filed within 10
days of the date of the issuance of the challenged ruling but no later than the
time for compliance with the order or the date of hearing, whichever is
first.
(6) Unless otherwise
provided by law, when reviewing a proposed decision of an administrative law
judge in a nondisciplinary contested case upon intra-agency appeal, the board
shall have the powers of and shall comply with the provisions of this chapter
which apply to presiding officers.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.