Iowa Admin. Code r. 661-502.8 - Use of criminal convictions in eligibility determinations and initial licensing decisions
(1)
License
application. Unless an applicant for licensure petitions the board for
an eligibility determination, the applicant's convictions will be reviewed when
the board receives a completed license application.
a.
Full disclosure. An
applicant is to disclose all convictions on a license application. Failure to
disclose all convictions is grounds for license denial or disciplinary action
following license issuance.
b.
Documentation and personal statement. An applicant with one or
more convictions is to submit the complete criminal record for each conviction
and a personal statement regarding whether each conviction directly relates to
the practice of the profession in order for the license application to be
considered complete.
c.
Rehabilitation. An applicant will, as part of the license
application, submit all evidence of rehabilitation that the applicant wishes to
be considered by the board. The board may deny a license if the applicant has a
disqualifying offense, unless the applicant demonstrates by clear and
convincing evidence that the applicant is rehabilitated pursuant to Iowa Code
section 272C.15. An applicant with one
or more disqualifying offenses who has been found rehabilitated still needs to
satisfy all other requirements for licensure.
d.
Nonrefundable fees. Any
application fees will not be refunded if the license is denied.
(2)
Eligibility
determination. An individual who has not yet submitted a completed
license application may petition the board for an eligibility determination. An
individual with criminal convictions is not required to petition the board for
an eligibility determination before applying for a license. To petition the
board for an eligibility determination, a petitioner is to submit all of the
following:
a. A completed eligibility
determination form, which is available on the board's website;
b. The complete criminal record for each of
the petitioner's convictions;
c. A
personal statement regarding whether each conviction directly relates to the
practice of the profession and why the board should find the petitioner
rehabilitated;
d. All evidence of
rehabilitation that the petitioner wants the board to consider; and
e. Payment of a nonrefundable fee in the
amount of $25.
(3)
Appeal. A petitioner found ineligible or an applicant denied a
license because of a disqualifying offense may appeal the decision in the
manner and time frame set forth in the board's written decision. A timely
appeal will initiate a nondisciplinary contested case proceeding. The
department's rules governing contested case proceedings apply unless otherwise
specified in this rule. If the petitioner or applicant fails to file a timely
appeal, the board's written decision will become a final order.
a.
Presiding officer. The
presiding officer will be the board. However, any party to an appeal of a
license denial or ineligibility determination may file a written request, in
accordance with rule 661-10.306 (17A), requesting
that the presiding officer be an administrative law judge. Additionally, the
board may, on its own motion, request that an administrative law judge be
assigned to act as presiding officer. When an administrative law judge serves
as the presiding officer, the decision rendered will be a proposed
decision.
b.
Burden. The office of the attorney general represents the
board's initial ineligibility determination or license denial and has the
burden of proof to establish that the petitioner's or applicant's convictions
include at least one disqualifying offense. If the office of the attorney
general satisfies this burden by a preponderance of the evidence, the burden of
proof shifts to the petitioner or applicant to establish rehabilitation by
clear and convincing evidence.
c.
Judicial review. A petitioner or applicant must appeal an
ineligibility determination or a license denial in order to exhaust
administrative remedies. A petitioner or applicant may only seek judicial
review of an ineligibility determination or license denial after the issuance
of a final order following a contested case proceeding. Judicial review of the
final order following a contested case proceeding is to be made in accordance
with Iowa Code chapter 17A.
(4)
Future petitions or
applications. If a final order determines a petitioner is ineligible,
the petitioner cannot submit a subsequent petition for eligibility
determination or a license application prior to the date specified in the final
order. If a final order denies a license application, the applicant cannot
submit a subsequent license application or a petition for eligibility
determination prior to the date specified in the final order.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.