Married taxpayers who have separate incomes and have filed
jointly for federal income tax purposes can elect to file separate Iowa returns
or to file separately on the combined Iowa return form. Where married persons
file separately, both must use the optional standard deduction if either elects
to use it, or both must claim itemized deductions if either elects to claim
itemized deductions. The provisions of Treasury Regulation ยง 1.63 -1 are
equally applicable regarding the election to use the standard deduction or
itemized deductions for Iowa income tax purposes. The spouses' election to file
separately for Iowa income tax purposes is subject to the condition that
incomes received by the taxpayers and the deductions for business expenses are
allocated between the spouses as the incomes and deductions would have been
allocated if the taxpayers had filed separate federal returns. Any Iowa
additions to net income and any deductions to net income which pertain to
taxpayers filing separately for Iowa income tax purposes must also be allocated
accurately between the spouses. Thus, if married taxpayers file a joint federal
return and elect to file separate Iowa returns or separately on the combined
Iowa return, the taxpayers are required to compute their separate Iowa net
incomes as if they had determined their federal adjusted gross incomes on
separate federal returns with the Iowa adjustments to net income.
However, the fact that the taxpayers file separately for Iowa
income tax purposes does not mean that the spouses will be subject to
limitations that would apply if the taxpayers had filed separate federal
returns. Instead, tax provisions that are applicable for taxpayers filing joint
federal returns are also applicable to the taxpayers when they file separate
Iowa returns unless the tax provisions are superseded by specific provisions in
Iowa income tax law.
For example, married taxpayers that file separate federal
returns cannot take the child and dependent care credit (in most instances) and
cannot take the earned income credit. Taxpayers that file a joint federal
return and elect to file separately for Iowa income tax purposes can take the
child and dependent care credit and the earned income credit on their Iowa
returns assuming they meet the qualifications for claiming these credits on the
joint federal return.
The following paragraphs and examples are provided to clarify
some issues and provide some guidance for taxpayers who filed a joint federal
income tax return and elect to file separate Iowa returns or separately on the
combined Iowa return form.
1. Election
to expense certain depreciable business assets. When married taxpayers who have
filed a joint federal return elect to file separate Iowa returns or separately
on the combined Iowa return form, the taxpayers may claim the same deduction
for the expensing of depreciable business assets as they were allowed on their
joint federal return of up to $100,000 (for the tax year beginning on or after
January 1, 2003, and which is adjusted annually for inflation for subsequent
tax years) as authorized under Section 179 of the Internal Revenue Code. In a
situation where one spouse is a wage earner and the second spouse has a small
business, the second spouse may claim the same deduction for expensing
depreciable assets of up to $100,000 (for the tax year beginning on or after
January 1,2003) that was allowable on the taxpayers' joint federal return. The
fact that a spouse elects to file a separate Iowa return or separately on the
combined return form after filing a joint federal return does not mean the
spouse is limited to the same deduction for expensing of depreciable business
assets of up to $5 0,000 (for the tax year beginning on or after January 1,
2003) that would have applied if the spouse had filed a separate federal
return.
In situations where a married couple has ownership of a
business, the deduction for the expensing of depreciable assets which is
allowable on the spouses' joint federal return should be allocated between the
spouses in the same ratio as incomes and losses from the business are reported
by the spouses. Subrule 40.15(4) sets out criteria for allocation of incomes
and losses of businesses in which married couples have an ownership
interest.
2. Capital
losses. Except for the Iowa capital gains deduction for limited amounts of net
capital gains from certain types of assets described in rule
701-4038.
(422), the federal income tax provision for reporting capital gains and losses
and for the carryover of capital losses in excess of certain amounts are
applicable for Iowa individual income tax purposes. When married taxpayers file
a joint federal income tax return and elect to file separate Iowa returns or
separately on the combined return form, the spouses must allocate capital gains
and losses between them on the basis of the ownership of the assets that were
sold or exchanged. That is, the spouses must allocate the capital gains and
losses between them on the separate Iowa returns as the capital gains and
losses would have been allocated if the taxpayers had filed separate federal
returns instead of a joint federal return. However, each spouse is not subject
to the $1,500 capital loss Limitation on the separate Iowa return which is
applicable to a married taxpayer that files a separate federal return. Instead,
the spouses are collectively subject to the same $3,000 capital loss Limitation
for married taxpayers filing joint federal returns which is authorized under
Section 1211(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. In circumstances where both
spouses have net capital losses, each of the spouses can claim a capital loss
of up to $1,500 on the separate Iowa return. In a situation where one spouse
has a net capital loss of less than $1,500 and the other spouse has a capital
loss greater than $1,500, the first spouse can claim the entire capital loss,
while the second spouse can claim the portion of the net capital loss on the
joint federal return that was not claimed by the first spouse. In no case can
the net capital losses claimed on separate Iowa returns by married taxpayers
exceed the $3,000 maximum capital loss that is allowed on the joint federal
return. In a circumstance where one spouse has a net capital loss and the other
spouse has a net capital gain, the amounts of capital gains and losses claimed
by the spouses on their separate Iowa returns must conform with the net capital
gain amount or net capital loss amount claimed on the joint federal return for
the taxpayers. The following examples illustrate how capital gains and losses
are to be allocated between spouses filing separate Iowa returns or separately
on the combined Iowa return form for married taxpayers who filed joint federal
returns.
Example 1. A married couple filed a joint federal return
which showed a net capital loss of $3,000. All of the capital loss was
attributable to the husband, as the wife had no capital gains or losses.
Therefore, when the taxpayers filed separate Iowa returns, the husband's return
showed a $3,000 capital loss and the wife's return showed no capital gains or
losses.
Example 2. A married couple filed a joint federal return
showing a net capital loss of $3,000, which was the maximum loss they could
claim, although they had aggregate capital losses of $8,000. The husband had a
net capital loss of $6,000 and the wife had a net capital loss of $2,000. When
the taxpayers filed their separate Iowa returns each spouse claimed a net
capital loss of $1,500, since each spouse had a capital loss of up to $1,500.
The husband had a net capital loss carryover of $4,500 and the wife had a net
capital loss carryover of $500.
Example 3. A married couple filed a joint federal return
showing a net capital loss of $2,500. The husband had a net capital gain of
$7,500 and the wife had a net capital loss of $ 10,000. The wife claimed a net
capital loss of $10,000 on her separate Iowa return, while the husband reported
a net capital gain of $7,500 on his separate Iowa return.
Example 4. A married couple filed a joint federal return
showing a net capital loss of $3,000. The wife had a net capital loss of $800
and the husband had a net capital loss of $2,500. The wife claimed a $800 net
capital loss on her separate Iowa return. The husband claimed a net capital
loss on his separate Iowa return of $2,200 which was the portion of the net
capital loss claimed on the joint federal return that was not claimed by the
wife. The husband had a net capital loss carryover of $300.
3. Unemployment compensation benefits. When a
husband and wife have filed a joint federal return and elect to file separate
Iowa returns or separately on the Iowa combined return form, the spouses are to
report the same amount of unemployment compensation benefits on their Iowa
returns as was reported for federal income tax purposes as provided in Section
85 of the Internal Revenue Code. When unemployment compensation benefits are
received in the tax year the benefits are to be reported by the spouse or
spouses who received the benefits as a result of employment of the spouse or
spouses. Nonresidents of Iowa, including nonresidents covered by the reciprocal
agreement with Illinois, are to report unemployment compensation benefits on
the Iowa income tax return as Iowa source income to the extent the benefits
pertain to the individual's employment in Iowa. In a situation where the
unemployment compensation benefits are the result of employment in Iowa and in
one or more other states, the unemployment compensation benefits should be
allocated to Iowa on the basis of the individual's Iowa salaries and wages for
the employer to the total salaries and wages for the employer However, to the
extent that unemployment compensation benefits pertain to a person's employment
in Iowa for a railroad and the benefits are paid by the railroad retirement
board, the benefits are totally exempt from Iowa income tax pursuant to 45
U.S.C. Section
352(e).
(1)
income
from property in which only one spouse has an ownership interest hut which is
not used in business. If ownership of property not used in a business
is in the name of only one spouse and each files a separate state return,
income derived from such property may not be divided between husband and wife
but must be reported by only that spouse possessing the ownership
interest.
(2)
income from
property in which both husband and wife have an ownership interest but which is
not used in a business. A husband and wife who file a joint federal
return and elect to file separate Iowa returns must each report the share of
income from jointly or commonly owned real estate, stocks, bonds, bank
accounts, and other property not used in a business in the same manner as if
their federal adjusted gross incomes had been determined separately. The rules
for determining the manner of reporting this income depend upon the nature of
the ownership interest and, in general, may be summarized as follows:
a. Joint tenants. A husband and wife owning
property as joint tenants with the right of survivorship, a common example of
which is a joint savings account, should each report on separate returns
one-half of the income from the savings account held by them in joint
tenancy.
b. Tenants in common.
income from property held by husband and wife as tenants in common is
reportable by them in proportion to their legally enforceable ownership
interests in the property.
(3)
Salary and wages derived from
personal or professional services performed in the course of
employment. A husband and wife who file a joint federal return and
elect to file separate Iowa returns must report on each spouse's state return
the salary and wages which are attributable to services performed pursuant to
each individual's employment. The income must be reported on Iowa separate
returns in the same manner as if their federal adjusted gross incomes had been
determined separately. The manner of reporting wages and salaries by spouses is
dependent upon the nature of the employment relationship and is subject to the
following rules:
a. Interspousal
employment-salary or wages paid by one spouse to the other Wages or
compensation paid for services or labor performed by one spouse with respect to
property or business owned by the other spouse may be reported on a separate
return if the amount of the payment is reasonable for the services or labor
actually performed. It is presumed that the compensation or wages paid by one
spouse to the other is not reasonable nor allowable for purposes of reporting
the income separately unless a bona fide employer-employee relationship exists.
For example, unless actual services are rendered, payments are actually made,
working hours and standards are set and adhered to, unemployment compensation
and workers' compensation requirements are met, the payments may not be
separately reported by the salaried spouse.
b. Wages and salaries received by a husband
or wife pursuant to an employment agreement with an employer other than a
spouse. Wages or compensation paid for services or labor performed by a husband
or wife pursuant to an employment agreement with some other employer is
presumed income of only that spouse that is employed and must be reported
separately only by that spouse.
(4)
income from a business in which
both husband and wife have an ownership interest. income derived from
a business the ownership of which is in both spouses' names, as evidenced by
record title or by the existence of a bona fide partnership agreement or by
other recognized method of establishing legal ownership, may be allocated
between spouses and reported on separate individual state income tax returns
provided that the interest of each spouse is allocated according to the capital
interest of each, the management and control exercised by each, and the
services performed by each with respect to such business. compliance with the
conditions contained in paragraphs
"a" or
"b "
of this subrule and consideration of paragraphs
"c, " "d, "
and
"e " of this subrule must be made in allocating income from
a business in which both husband and wife have an ownership interest.
a. Allocation of partnership income.
Allocation of partnership income between spouses is presumed valid only if
partnership information returns, as required for income tax purposes, have
currently been filed with respect to the federal self-employment tax law. An
oral understanding does not constitute a bona fide partnership implied merely
from a common ownership of property.
b. Allocation of income derived from a
business other than a partnership in which both husband and wife claim an
ownership interest. In the case of a business owned by a husband and wife who
filed a joint federal income tax return in which one of them claimed all of the
income therefrom for federal self-employment tax purposes, it will be presumed
for purposes of administering the state income tax law, unless expressly shown
to the contrary by the taxpayer, that the spouse who claimed that income for
federal self-employment tax purposes did, thereby, with the consent of the
other spouse, claim all right to such income and that therefore such income
must be included in the state income tax return of the spouse who claimed it
for federal self-employment tax purposes if the husband and wife file separate
state income tax returns.
c.
Capital contribution. In determining the weight to be attributed to the capital
contribution of each spouse to a business, consideration may be given only to
that invested capital which is legally traceable to each individual spouse.
Capital existing under the right, dominion, and control of one spouse which is
invested in the business is presumed to be a capital contribution of that
spouse. Sham transactions which do not affect real changes of ownership in
capital between spouses in that such transactions do not legally disturb the
right, dominion, and control of the assignor or the donor over the capital must
be disregarded in determining capital contribution of the recipient
spouse.
d. Management and control.
Participation in the control and management of a business must be distinguished
from the regular performance of nonmanagerial services. Contribution of
management and control with respect to the business must be of a substantial
nature in order to accord it weight in making an allocation of income.
Substantial participation in management does not necessarily involve continuous
or even frequent presence at the place of business, but it does involve genuine
consultation with respect to at least major business decisions, and it
presupposes substantial acquaintance with an interest in the operations,
problems, and policies of the business, along with sufficient maturity and
background of education or experience to indicate an ability to grasp business
problems that are appreciably cornmensurate with the demands of the enterprise
concerned. Vague or general statements as to family discussions at home or
elsewhere will not be accepted as a sufficient showing of actual
consultation.
e. Services
performed. The amount of services performed by each spouse is a factor to be
considered in determining proper allocation of income from a business in which
each spouse has an ownership interest. In order to accord weight to services
performed by an individual spouse, the services must be of a beneficial nature
in that they make a direct contribution to the business. For example, for a
business operation, whether it is a retail sales enterprise, farming operation
or otherwise, in which both husband and wife have an ownership interest, the
services contributed by the spouses must be directly connected with the
business operation. Services for the family such as planting and maintaining
family gardens, domestic housework, cooking family meals, and routine errands
and shopping, are not considered to be services performed or rendered as an
incident of or a contribution to the particular business; such activities by a
spouse must be disregarded in determining the allocable income attributable to
that spouse.
This rule is intended to implement Iowa Code section
422.7.