Iowa Code r. 193-7.14 - Disqualification
(1) A presiding
officer or other person will withdraw from participation in the making of any
proposed or final decision in a contested case if that person:
a. Has a personal bias or prejudice
concerning a party or a representative of a party;
b. Has personally investigated, prosecuted or
advocated in connection with that case, the specific controversy underlying
that case, another pending factually related contested case, or a pending
factually related controversy that may culminate in a contested case involving
the same parties;
c. Is subject to
the authority, direction or discretion of any person who has personally
investigated, prosecuted or advocated, in connection with that contested case,
the specific controversy underlying that contested case, or a pending factually
related contested case or controversy involving the same parties;
d. Has acted as counsel to any person who is
a private party to that proceeding within the past two years;
e. Has a personal financial interest in the
outcome of the case or any other significant personal interest that could be
substantially affected by the outcome of the case;
f. Has a spouse or relative within the third
degree of relationship who (1) is a party to the case, or an officer, director
or trustee of a party; (2) is a lawyer in the case; (3) is known to have an
interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the case; or
(4) is likely to be a material witness in the case; or
g. Has any other legally sufficient cause to
withdraw from participation in the decision making in that case.
(2) The term "personally
investigated" means taking affirmative steps to interview witnesses directly or
to obtain documents or other information directly. The term "personally
investigated" does not include general direction and supervision of assigned
investigators, unsolicited receipt of information that is relayed to assigned
investigators, review of another person's investigative work product in the
course of determining whether there is probable cause to initiate a proceeding,
or exposure to factual information while performing other board functions,
including fact gathering for purposes other than investigation of the matter
that culminates in a contested case. A person voluntarily appearing before the
board or a committee of the board waives any objection to a board member or
board staff both participating in the appearance and later participating as a
decision maker or aid to the decision maker in a contested case. Factual
information relevant to the merits of a contested case received by a person who
later serves as presiding officer in that case will be disclosed if required by
Iowa Code section 17A.17(3) and
subrule 7.28(9).
(3) In a situation
where a presiding officer or other person knows of information that might
reasonably be deemed to be a basis for disqualification and decides voluntary
withdrawal is unnecessary, that person will submit the relevant information for
the record by affidavit and provide for the record a statement of the reasons
for the determination that withdrawal is unnecessary.
(4) If a party asserts disqualification on
any appropriate ground, including those listed in subrule 7.14(1), the party
will file a motion supported by an affidavit pursuant to Iowa Code sections
17A.11(3) and
17A.17(7). The
motion will need to be filed as soon as practicable after the reason alleged in
the motion becomes known to the party.
(5) If, during the course of the hearing, a
party first becomes aware of evidence of bias or other grounds for
disqualification, the party may move for disqualification but will need to
establish the grounds by the introduction of evidence into the
record.
(6) A motion to disqualify
a board member or other person will first be directed to the affected board
member or other person for determination. If the board member or other person
determines that disqualification is appropriate, the board member or other
person will withdraw from further participation in the case. If the board
member or other person determines that withdrawal is not required, the
presiding officer will promptly review that determination, provided that, if
the person at issue is an administrative law judge, the review will be by the
board. If the presiding officer determines that disqualification is
appropriate, the board member or other person will withdraw. If the presiding
officer determines that withdrawal is not required, the presiding officer will
enter an order to that effect. A party asserting disqualification may seek an
interlocutory appeal under rule
193-7.31 (17A), if applicable,
and seek a stay under rule
193-7.34 (17A).
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.