Permitted solid waste composting facilities receiving more
than 5,000 tons of feedstock annually, bulking agent excluded, must obtain and
submit a financial assurance instrument to the department for waste materials
received and stockpiled by the facility in accordance with this rule. The
financial assurance instrument shall provide monetary funds to properly dispose
of any preprocessed and postprocessed stockpiled materials that may remain at a
facility due to the owner's or operator's failure to properly close the site
within 30 days of permit suspension, termination, revocation, or
expiration.
(1)
No permit
without financial assurance. The department shall not issue or renew a
permit to an owner or operator of a solid waste composting facility until a
financial assurance instrument has been submitted to and approved by the
department.
(2)
Proof of
compliance. Proof of the establishment of the financial assurance
instrument and compliance with this rule, including a current closure cost
estimate, shall be submitted to the department within 30 days of the close of
the permit holder's first fiscal year that begins after June 19, 2002, or at
the time of application for a permit for a new solid waste composting facility.
The owner or operator must provide continuous coverage for closure and submit
proof of compliance, including an updated closure cost estimate, with each
permit renewal thereafter until released from this requirement by the
department.
(3)
Use of one
financial assurance instrument for multiple permitted activities.
Solid waste composting facilities required to maintain financial assurance
pursuant to any other provisions of 567-Chapters 100 to 123 may satisfy the
requirements of this rule by the use of one financial assurance instrument if
the permit holder ensures that the instrument provides financial assurance for
an amount at least equal to the current cost estimates for closure of all
sanitary disposal project activities covered.
(4)
Financial assurance amounts
required. The estimate submitted to the department must be certified
by an Iowa-licensed professional engineer and must account for at least the
following factors determined by the department to be minimal necessary costs
for closure:
a. Transportation costs, which
include the cost to load the material, and total tip fees to properly dispose
of the maximum tonnage of received materials that could be managed and
stockpiled by the compost facility. Also included shall be the costs of
properly removing any wastewater held at the facility, or
b. Cost of a beneficial reuse option,
approved pursuant to subrule 105.13(3), for the total amount of material that
could be managed and stockpiled by the composting facility. If the total amount
of material will not be beneficially reused, the remainder of the cost shall be
calculated according to paragraph 105.14(4)"a." Also included
shall be the costs of properly removing any wastewater held at the
facility.
c. The costs for
maintaining financial assurance pursuant to any other provisions of
567-Chapters 100 to 123, if any, in accordance with subrule
105.14(3).
(5)
Acceptable financial assurance instruments. The financial
assurance instrument shall be established in an amount equal to the cost
estimate prepared in accordance with subrule 105.14(4) and shall not be
canceled, revoked, disbursed, released, or allowed to terminate without the
approval of the department. Financial assurance may be provided by cash in the
form of a secured trust fund or local government dedicated fund, surety bond,
letter of credit, or corporate or local government guarantee as follows:
a.
Secured trust fund. The
owner or operator of a solid waste composting facility or entity serving as a
guarantor may demonstrate financial assurance for closure by establishing a
secured trust fund that conforms to the requirements of this paragraph.
(1) The trustee must be an entity which has
the authority to act as a trustee and whose trust operations are regulated and
examined by a federal or state agency. The fund shall be restricted for the
sole purpose of funding closure activities at the facility, and a copy of the
trust agreement must be submitted to the department and placed in the
facility's official files.
(2) A
secured trust fund shall name the department of natural resources as the entity
authorized to draw funds from the trust, subject to the provision of proper
notification to the trust officer of failure by the permittee to properly close
the site within 30 days of permit suspension, termination, revocation, or
expiration.
(3) Moneys in the fund
shall not be assigned for the benefit of creditors with the exception of the
state.
(4) Moneys in the fund shall
not be used to pay any final judgment against a permit holder arising out of
the ownership or operation of the site during its active life or after
closure.
(5) The owner or operator
or another person authorized to conduct closure activities may request
reimbursement from the trustee for closure expenditures as they are incurred.
Requests for reimbursement shall be granted by the trustee only if sufficient
funds are remaining in the trust fund to cover the remaining costs of closure
and if documentation of the justification for reimbursement has been submitted
to the department for prior approval.
(6) If the balance of the trust fund exceeds
the current cost estimate for closure at any time, the owner or operator may
request withdrawal of the excess funds from the trustee so long as the
withdrawal does not cause the balance to be reduced below the amount of the
current cost estimate.
b.
Local government dedicated fund. The owner or operator of a
publicly owned solid waste composting facility or a local government serving as
a guarantor may demonstrate financial assurance for closure by establishing a
dedicated fund that conforms to the requirements of this paragraph.
(1) The fund shall be dedicated by state
constitutional provision or local government statute, charter, ordinance,
resolution or order as a restricted fund to pay for closure costs arising from
the operation of the solid waste composting facility.
(2) A copy of the document establishing the
dedicated fund must be submitted to the department and placed in the facility's
official files.
(3) If the balance
of the dedicated fund exceeds the current cost estimate for closure at any
time, the owner or operator may withdraw excess funds so long as the withdrawal
does not cause the balance to be reduced below the amount of the current cost
estimate.
c.
Surety bond. A surety bond must be written by a company
authorized by the commissioner of insurance to do business in the state. The
surety bond shall comply with the following:
(1) The bond shall be in a form approved by
the commissioner of insurance and shall be payable to the department of natural
resources.
(2) The bond shall be
specific to a particular facility for the purpose of properly disposing of any
solid waste that may remain on site due to the owner's or operator's failure to
properly close the site within 30 days of permit suspension, termination,
revocation, or expiration.
(3) The
owner or operator shall provide the department with a statement from the surety
with each permit application renewal, noting that the bond is paid and current
for the permit period for which the owner or operator has applied for
renewal.
d.
Letter of credit. The issuing institution must be an entity
which has the authority to issue letters of credit and whose letter-of-credit
operations are regulated and examined by a federal or state agency.
(1) The owner or operator must submit to the
department a copy of the letter of credit and place a copy in the facility's
official files.
(2) A letter from
the owner or operator referring to the letter of credit by number, issuing
institution, and date, and providing the name and address of the facility and
the amount of funds assured, must be included with the letter of credit
submitted to the department and placed in the facility's files.
(3) The letter of credit must be irrevocable
and must be issued for a period of at least one year. The letter of credit must
provide that the expiration date will be automatically extended for a period of
at least one year unless the issuing institution has canceled the letter of
credit by sending notice of cancellation by certified mail to the owner or
operator and to the department 90 days in advance of cancellation. When such
notice is provided, the owner or operator shall, within 60 days, provide to the
department adequate proof of alternative financial assurance, notice of
withdrawal of cancellation, or proof of a deposit of a sum equal to the amount
of the letter of credit into a secured trust fund that meets the requirements
of paragraph 105.14(5)"a." If the owner or operator has not
complied with this subrule within the 60-day time period, the issuer of the
letter of credit shall deposit a sum equal to the amount of the letter of
credit into the secured trust fund established by the owner or operator. The
provision of funds by the issuer of the letter of credit shall be considered an
issuance of a loan to the owner or operator, and the terms of that loan shall
be governed by the letter of credit or subsequent agreement between those
parties. The state shall not be considered a party to this credit
transaction.
e.
Corporate guarantee. An owner or operator may meet the
requirements of this rule by obtaining a written guarantee. The guarantor must
be the direct or higher-tier parent corporation of the owner or operator, an
owner or operator whose parent corporation is also the parent corporation of
the owner or operator, or an owner or operator with a "substantial business
relationship'' with the owner or operator.
(1)
The terms of the written guarantee must provide that within 30 days of the
owner's or operator's failure to perform closure of a facility covered by the
guarantee, the guarantor will:
1. Perform
closure or pay a third party to perform closure as required (performance
guarantee);
2. Establish a fully
funded secured trust fund as specified in paragraph
105.14(5)"a" in the name of the owner or operator (payment
guarantee); or
3. Establish an
alternative financial assurance instrument in the name of the owner or operator
as required by this rule.
(2) The guarantor must satisfy one of the
following three conditions:
1. A current
rating for its senior unsubordinated debt of AAA, AA, A, or BBB as issued by
Standard & Poor's or Aaa, Aa, A, or Baa as issued by Moody's; or
2. A ratio of less than 1.5 comparing total
liabilities to net worth; or
3. A
ratio of greater than 0.10 comparing the sum of net income plus depreciation,
depletion and amortization, minus $10 million, to total liabilities.
(3) The tangible net worth of the
guarantor must be greater than the sum of the current closure cost estimate and
any other environmental obligations, including other financial assurance
guarantees.
(4) The guarantor must
have assets amounting to at least the sum of the current closure cost estimate
and any other environmental obligations, including other financial assurance
guarantees.
(5) Record-keeping and
reporting requirements. The guarantor must submit the following records to the
department and place a copy in the facility's official files:
1. A copy of the written guarantee between
the owner or operator and the guarantor.
2. A letter signed by a certified public
accountant and based upon a certified audit that:
* Lists all the current cost estimates covered by a guarantee
including, but not limited to, cost estimates required by subrule 105.14(4);
cost estimates required for municipal solid waste management facilities
pursuant to 40 CFR Part 258 ; cost estimates required for UIC facilities under
40 CFR Part 144, if applicable; cost estimates required for petroleum
underground storage tank facilities under 40 CFR Part 280, if applicable; cost
estimates required for PCB storage facilities under 40 CFR Part 761, if
applicable; and cost estimates required for hazardous waste treatment, storage,
and disposal facilities under 40 CFR Parts 264 and 265, if applicable;
and
* Provides evidence demonstrating that the guarantor meets
the conditions of subparagraphs 105.14(5)"e"(2), (3) and
(4).
3. A copy of the
independent certified public accountant's unqualified opinion of the
guarantor's financial statements for the latest completed fiscal year. In order
for the guarantor to be eligible to use the guarantee, the guarantor's
financial statements must receive an unqualified opinion from the independent
certified public accountant. An adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion shall
be cause for disallowance of this instrument. A qualified opinion related to
the demonstration of financial assurance may, at the discretion of the
department, be cause for disallowance. If the department does not allow use of
the corporate guarantee, the owner or operator must provide alternative
financial assurance that meets the requirements of this rule.
f.
Local
government guarantee. An owner or operator may demonstrate financial
assurance for closure by obtaining a written guarantee provided by a local
government or jointly provided by the members of an agency established pursuant
to Iowa Code chapter 28E.
(1) The terms of the
written guarantee must provide that within 30 days of the owner's or operator's
failure to perform closure of a facility covered by the guarantee, the
guarantor will:
1. Perform closure or pay a
third party to perform closure as required (performance guarantee);
2. Establish a fully funded secured trust
fund as specified in paragraph 105.14(5)"a" in the name of the
owner or operator (payment guarantee); or
3. Establish an alternative financial
assurance instrument in the name of the owner or operator as required by this
rule.
(2) The guarantor
must satisfy one of the following requirements:
1. If the guarantor has outstanding, rated,
general obligation bonds that are not secured by insurance, a letter of credit,
or other collateral or guarantee, the guarantor must have a current rating of
Aaa, Aa, A, or Baa, as issued by Moody's, or AAA, AA, A, or BBB, as issued by
Standard & Poor's, on all such general obligation bonds; or
2. The guarantor must satisfy each of the
following financial ratios based on the guarantor's most recent audited annual
financial statement: a ratio of cash plus marketable securities to total
expenditures greater than or equal to 0.05, and a ratio of annual debt service
to total expenditures less than or equal to 0.20.
(3) The guarantor must prepare its financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles or other
comprehensive basis of accounting and have its financial statements audited by
an independent certified public accountant or the office of the auditor of the
state of Iowa. The financial statement shall be in the form prescribed by the
office of the auditor of the state of Iowa.
(4) A guarantor is not eligible to assure its
obligations if:
1. The guarantor is currently
in default on any outstanding general obligation bonds; or
2. The guarantor has any outstanding general
obligation bonds rated lower than Baa as issued by Moody's or BBB as issued by
Standard & Poor's; or
3. The
guarantor operated at a deficit equal to 5 percent or more of total annual
revenue in each of the past two fiscal years; or
4. The guarantor receives an adverse opinion
or disclaimer of opinion from the independent certified public accountant or
office of the auditor of the state of Iowa auditing its financial statement. A
qualified opinion that is related to the demonstration of financial assurance
may, at the discretion of the department, be cause for disallowance of this
mechanism; or
5. The closure costs
to be assured are greater than 43 percent of the guarantor's total annual
revenue.
(5) The local
government guarantor must include disclosure of the closure costs assured
through the guarantee in its next annual audit report prior to the initial
receipt of waste at the facility or prior to cancellation of an alternative
financial assurance instrument, whichever is later. For the first year the
guarantee is used to assure costs at a particular facility, the reference may
instead be placed in the guarantor's official files until issuance of the next
available annual audit report if timing does not permit the reference to be
incorporated into the most recently issued annual audit report or budget. For
closure costs, conformance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board
Statement 18 ensures compliance with this public notice component.
(6) The local government owner or operator
must submit to the department the following items:
1. A copy of the written guarantee between
the owner or operator and the local government serving as guarantor for the
closure costs at the facility.
2. A
copy of the guarantor's most recent annual financial audit report indicating
compliance with the financial ratios required by numbered paragraph
105.14(5)"f"(2)"2," if applicable, and the requirements of
subparagraphs 105.14(5)"f"(3) and (4).
3. A letter signed by the local government's
chief financial officer that lists all the current cost estimates covered by
the guarantor, as described in subrule 105.14(4); and that provides evidence
and certifies that the local government meets the conditions of subparagraphs
105.14(5)"f"(2), (3), (4) and (5).
(6)
Financial
assurance cancellation and permit suspension.
a. A financial assurance instrument may be
terminated by the owner or operator only if the owner or operator substitutes
alternate financial assurance prior to cancellation, as specified in this rule,
or if the owner or operator is no longer required to demonstrate financial
responsibility in accordance with this rule.
b. A financial assurance instrument shall be
continuous in nature until canceled by the financial assurance provider or
until the department gives written notification to the owner, operator, and
financial assurance provider that the covered site has been properly closed.
The financial assurance provider shall give at least 90 days' notice in writing
to the owner or operator and the department in the event of any intent to
cancel the instrument.
c. Within 60
days of receipt of a written notice of cancellation of financial assurance by
the financial assurance provider, the owner or operator must provide the
department an alternative financial assurance instrument. If a means of
continued financial assurance is not provided within that 60 days, the
department shall suspend the permit.
d. The owner or operator shall perform proper
closure within 30 days of the permit suspension. For the purpose of this rule,
"proper closure" means completion of all items pursuant to rule
567-105.13 (455B,455D) and
subrule 105.14(4).
e. If the owner
or operator does not properly close the site within the 30-day period allowed,
the department shall file a claim with the financial assurance instrument
provider to collect the amount of funds necessary to properly close the
site.
f. An owner or operator who
elects to terminate a permitted activity, whose renewal application has been
denied, or whose permit has been suspended or revoked for cause must submit
within 30 days of the termination of the permit a schedule for completing
proper closure of the terminated activity. Closure completion cannot exceed 60
days from the date of termination of the permit.
g. The director may also request payment from
any financial assurance provider for the purpose of completing closure when the
following circumstances exist:
(1) The owner
or operator is more than 15 days late in providing a schedule for closure or
for meeting any date in the schedule for closure.
(2) The owner or operator declares an
economic inability to comply with this rule, either by sending written
notification to the director or through an action such as, but not limited to,
filing for bankruptcy.