Iowa Code r. 681-20.6 - Presiding officer
(1) Any
party who wishes to request that the presiding officer assigned to render a
proposed decision be an administrative law judge employed by the department of
inspections and appeals must file a written request within 20 days after
service of a notice of hearing which identifies or describes the presiding
officer as the board of regents head or members of the board of
regents.
(2) The board of regents
may deny the request only upon a finding that one or more of the following
apply:
a. Neither the board of regents nor any
officer of the board of regents under whose authority the contested case is to
take place is a named party to the proceeding or a real party in interest to
that proceeding.
b. There is a
compelling need to expedite issuance of a final decision in order to protect
the public health, safety, or welfare.
c. An administrative law judge with the
qualifications identified in subrule 20.6(4) is unavailable to hear the case
within a reasonable time.
d. The
case involves significant policy issues of first impression that are
inextricably intertwined with the factual issues presented.
e. The demeanor of the witnesses is likely to
be dispositive in resolving the disputed factual issues.
f. Funds are unavailable to pay the costs of
an administrative law judge and an interagency appeal.
g. The request was not timely
filed.
h. The request is not
consistent with a specified statute.
(3) The board of regents or its executive
director shall issue a written ruling specifying the grounds for its decision
within 20 days after a request for an administrative law judge is filed. If the
ruling is contingent upon the availability of an administrative law judge with
the qualifications identified in subrule 20.6(4), the parties shall be notified
at least 10 days prior to hearing if a qualified administrative law judge will
not be available.
(4) An
administrative law judge assigned to act as presiding officer in a case
involving discipline or discharge of a faculty member at one of the
universities, or discipline or discharge of a student for academic dishonesty
at one of the universities shall have the following technical expertness unless
waived by the board of regents: an advanced degree showing scholarly
achievement, such as a doctor of philosophy degree, or knowledge of academic
traditions and methods of teaching and research at institutions of higher
education in the United States.
(5)
Except as provided otherwise by another provision of law, all rulings by an
administrative law judge acting as presiding officer are subject to appeal to
the board of regents, or in a case involving a matter arising from a regent
institution, the president or superintendent of that institution. A party must
seek any available intra-agency appeal in order to exhaust adequate
administrative remedies.
(6) Unless
otherwise provided by law, the board of regents, when reviewing a proposed
decision upon intra-agency appeal, shall have the powers of and shall comply
with the provisions of this chapter which apply to presiding
officers.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.