Kan. Admin. Regs. § 129-9-9 - External independent third-party review for providers
(a) Effective with each denial issued by a
managed care organization (MCO) on or after January 1, 2020, each provider who
has been denied an authorization for a new healthcare service to an enrollee or
a claim for reimbursement to the provider for a healthcare service rendered to
an enrollee shall be entitled to an external independent third-party review
pursuant to
K.S.A.
39-709i, and amendments thereto. Each MCO
denial reviewed by the external independent third-party reviewer shall have
been issued pursuant to a contract between the MCO and the Kansas medical
assistance program (KMAP). The contract shall have been effective January 1,
2020 or later.
(b) The request for
an external independent third-party review shall apply only to denials for
which the provider has completed the internal written appeals process of an MCO
on or after January 1, 2020. Each provider shall have the right to submit a
request for an external independent third-party review following receipt of the
MCO's adequate notice of appeal resolution or remittance advice.
(c) The MCO shall send an adequate notice of
appeal resolution to the provider when the MCO reviews the request for an
appeal of an action or adverse benefit determination. Each adequate notice of
appeal resolution shall meet the requirements of the secretary and shall
include the following:
(1) The date of the
adequate notice of appeal resolution;
(2) the action or adverse benefit
determination that is the subject of the appeal;
(3) the results of the resolution process and
the date of the appeal resolution;
(4) the reasons for the appeal resolution,
including an explanation of the medical basis for the resolution, application
of policy, or accepted standard of medical practice to the enrollee's medical
circumstances, if the MCO based its resolution upon a determination that the
service is not medically necessary;
(5) the statute, regulation, policy, or
procedure supporting the appeal resolution;
(6) a statement that the provider has
completed the appeal process with the MCO;
(7) a statement of the provider's right to
request an external independent third-party review following receipt of the
adequate notice of appeal resolution;
(8) a statement of the required procedures by
which a provider may request an external independent third-party review with
the MCO issuing the decision to be reviewed within 60 days of the date of the
adequate notice of appeal resolution. Pursuant to
K.S.A.
77-531 and amendments thereto, three days
shall be added to the 60-day response period if the notice is served by U.S.
mail or by electronic means. The statement shall include the address and
contact information for submission of the request;
(9) a statement that if the provider does not
request an external independent third-party review, the provider has a right,
pursuant to
K.S.A.
39-709h(e)(4) and amendments
thereto, to request a state fair hearing within 120 days of the date of the
adequate notice of appeal resolution. Pursuant to
K.S.A.
77-531 and amendments thereto, three days
shall be added to the 120-day response period if the notice is served by U.S.
mail or by electronic means;
(10)
the procedures by which the provider may request a state fair hearing and the
address and contact information for submission of the request or, for an action
based on a change in law, the circumstances under which a state fair hearing
will be granted;
(11) a statement of
the provider's right to have self-representation or use legal counsel, a
relative, a friend, or a spokesperson; and
(12) any other information required by Kansas
statute or regulation that involves the MCO's adequate notice of appeal
resolution.
(d) Each
provider receiving an adequate notice of appeal resolution from an MCO that
does not include the information specified in paragraphs (c)(6) through (c)(8)
shall be entitled to a penalty fee of $333.00, $666.00, or $1,000.00 pursuant
to paragraphs (d)(1)(A) through (C). The provider shall notify the secretary of
the deficient notice.
(1) The penalty fee for
each deficient notice of appeal resolution shall be calculated by the secretary
according to the following fee structure:
(A)
A notice failing to include one of the three requirements specified in
paragraphs (c)(6) through (c)(8) shall incur a penalty fee of
$333.00.
(B) A notice failing to
include two of the three requirements specified in paragraphs (c)(6) through
(c)(8) shall incur a penalty fee of $666.00.
(C) A notice failing to include three of the
three requirements specified in paragraphs (c)(6) through (c)(8) shall incur a
penalty fee of $1,000.00.
(2) The MCO issuing the deficient notice
shall pay the penalty fee to the provider receiving the deficient notice within
10 business days of the secretary's notification to the MCO of the deficient
notice.
(3) The provider shall
notify the secretary of any dispute that arises regarding the penalty fee. This
dispute shall be resolved by the secretary and shall not include the right to
request a reconsideration, an appeal, or a state fair
hearing.
(e) Any provider
may submit a written request for an external independent third-party review to
the MCO issuing the decision to be reviewed. The provider's request for this
review shall include the following:
(1)
Identification of each specific issue and dispute directly related to the
adverse appeal decision issued by the MCO;
(2) a statement of the basis upon which the
provider believes the MCO's decision to be erroneous; and
(3) the provider's designated contact
information, including name, postal mailing address, telephone number, fax
number, and electronic-mail address.
(f)
(1)
Within five business days of receiving a provider's request for external
independent third-party review, the MCO shall perform the following:
(A) Send to the provider's designated contact
a written acknowledgement letter specifying that the MCO has received the
request for review;
(B) notify the
secretary of the provider's request for review; and
(C) send a copy of the written
acknowledgement letter to the enrollee, if related to the denial of an
authorization for a new healthcare service.
(2) If the secretary determines that the MCO
failed to meet the requirements of paragraphs (f)(1)(A) through (C), then the
provider who submitted the request for review shall automatically prevail in
the review. Within five business days of receipt of the secretary's
notification that the provider automatically prevails, the MCO shall issue an
approval letter regarding the reversal of the MCO's appeal decision to the
prevailing provider and the secretary. The MCO shall also issue an approval
letter to the affected enrollee if the request for review is related to the
denial of an authorization for a new healthcare service. The MCO shall not be
required to reverse its decision for a request that does not include the
information specified in paragraphs (e)(1) through (e)(3), is submitted by a
provider who fails to complete the MCO's appeal process, is untimely, or does
not involve a denied authorization for a new healthcare service or a claim for
reimbursement.
(g)
(1) Within 15 business days of receiving a
provider's request for external independent third-party review, the MCO shall
perform the following:
(A) Submit to the
secretary all documentation submitted by the provider for the MCO's internal
appeal process; and
(B) provide the
MCO's designated contact information, including name, postal mailing address,
telephone number, fax number, and electronic-mail address.
(2) If the secretary determines that the MCO
failed to meet the requirements of paragraphs (g)(1)(A) and (B), then the
provider who submitted the request for review shall automatically prevail in
the review. Within five business days of receipt of the secretary's
notification that the provider automatically prevails, the MCO shall issue an
approval letter regarding the reversal of the MCO's appeal decision to the
prevailing provider and the secretary. The MCO shall also issue an approval
letter to the affected enrollee if the request for review is related to the
denial of an authorization for a new healthcare service. The MCO shall not be
required to reverse its decision for a request that does not include the
information specified in paragraphs (e)(1) through (e)(3), is submitted by a
provider who fails to complete the MCO's appeal process, is untimely, or does
not involve a denied authorization for a new healthcare service or a claim for
reimbursement.
(h) Each
request for an external independent third-party review shall be approved or
denied by the secretary. A request for an external independent third-party
review that does not include the information specified in paragraphs (e)(1)
through (e)(3), is submitted by a provider who fails to complete the MCO's
appeal process, is untimely, or does not involve a denied authorization for a
new healthcare service or a claim for reimbursement shall be denied by the
secretary. A letter regarding the denial of the request for an external
independent third-party review shall be issued by the secretary to the
requesting provider and the MCO. A denial letter shall also be issued to the
affected enrollee if the request for review is related to the denial of an
authorization for a new healthcare service.
(i) The decision by the external independent
third-party reviewer shall be based solely upon the documentation submitted by
the provider during the MCO's appeal process.
(j) The parties to each external independent
third-party review shall be the following:
(1)
A provider or the provider's authorized representative; and
(2) the MCO that made the decision involved
in the review.
(k) Upon
the request of a party, the external independent third-party reviewer may
determine in one action multiple requests made to the reviewer regarding the
same enrollee, a common question of fact, a common interpretation of applicable
regulations, or a common reimbursement requirement. The provider shall complete
the MCO's appeal process and submit a request for external review for each
denial of an authorization for a new healthcare service or denial of a claim
for reimbursement that the reviewer determines in one action.
(l) Any provider that initiated a request for
an external independent third-party review, or one or more other providers, may
add other initial denials of claims to the review before the reviewer's
decision if the claims involve a common question of fact, a common
interpretation of applicable regulations, or a common reimbursement
requirement. The provider shall complete the MCO's appeal process for each
denial of a claim for reimbursement reviewed by the reviewer. The provider
shall submit a request for external independent third-party review to the MCO
that denied the claim, for each additional claim.
(m) The external independent third-party
reviewer shall conduct an external independent third-party review of any denial
of authorization for a new healthcare service or denial of a claim for
reimbursement submitted to the reviewer.
(n) The external independent third-party
reviewer shall issue the reviewer's final decision in a letter to the
provider's designated contact, the MCO's designated contact, and the department
within 30 days from the date of receipt of the appeal documentation forwarded
by the secretary. The reviewer may extend the time to issue a final decision by
14 days upon agreement of both parties to the review. The reviewer's letter
shall include the following:
(1) The date of
the reviewer's decision letter;
(2)
the date of receipt of the provider's appeal documentation from the
secretary;
(3) the date of the
reviewer's decision and, if an extension was requested by the reviewer, the
date of the extension request;
(4)
the name and address of the requesting provider. If the reviewer determines in
one action multiple provider requests or requests involving multiple claims,
the reviewer shall issue a separate decision letter for each MCO, enrollee, and
provider as required to protect health information;
(5) a summary statement of the reason the
provider requested the external independent third-party review;
(6) the specialty or professional
certification of each individual reviewing the provider appeal
documentation;
(7) a summary
statement of the reviewer's rationale for affirming or reversing the MCO's
appeal decision. The statement shall include citation to the applicable
policies, research articles, medical necessity criteria, or any other
documentation relied upon by the reviewer in reaching its decision;
(8) the name of the medical director who
reviewed and approved the reviewer's decision;
(9) a statement directing the losing party of
the review to pay an amount equal to the costs of the review to the reviewer
and the due date for payment. The statement shall include the following:
(A) A statement that if the decision of the
external independent third-party reviewer is reviewed in a state fair hearing,
the payment due to the reviewer under this subsection shall be delayed until
the decision of the state fair hearing has been issued in the initial
order;
(B) a statement that the
losing party of the state fair hearing's initial order shall pay the costs of
the review to the reviewer within 45 days of service of the initial
order;
(C) a statement that if the
decision in the initial order is reviewed by the state appeals committee, the
payment due to the reviewer under this subsection shall be delayed until the
decision by the state appeals committee has been issued in the final order;
and
(D) a statement that the losing
party of the state appeal committee's final order shall pay the costs of the
review to the reviewer within 45 days of service of the final
order;
(10) the unique
number assigned by the MCO to each provider appeal;
(11) the unique number assigned by the
reviewer to each request for external independent third-party review;
and
(12) a statement that the
provider will receive an additional notice from one or more MCOs that includes
the right to request a state fair hearing regarding the reviewer's
decision.
(o) Within 10
business days of the MCO's receipt of the external independent third-party
reviewer's decision letter, the MCO shall issue a notice of the reviewer's
decision to the provider and the department. The MCO shall also issue a notice
of the reviewer's decision to the affected enrollee if the request for review
is related to the denial of an authorization for a new healthcare service. The
notice shall include the state fair hearing rights for the enrollee and the
provider.
(p) Each request for an
external independent third-party review shall automatically extend the deadline
to request a state fair hearing pending the outcome of the review. Any party,
including the affected enrollee, may request a state fair hearing within 30
days of the date of the MCO's notice of the reviewer's decision. Pursuant to
K.S.A.
77-531 and amendments thereto, three days
shall be added to the 30-day response period if the notice is served by U.S.
mail or by electronic means.
(q) The
decision of the external independent third-party reviewer shall be reviewed by
the secretary or the secretary's designee. If the MCO is the losing party of
the review, a determination regarding a review by OAH of the reviewer's
decision shall be made by the secretary.
(r) The scheduling of any state fair hearing
that involves a denial of an authorization for a new healthcare service or a
claim for reimbursement for which the provider has requested an external
independent third-party review shall be delayed until after the reviewer's
decision has been issued. The reviewer's decision letter, the documents
relevant to the reviewer's decision, and the MCO's notice of the reviewer's
decision shall be included in the state fair hearing case file for
consideration by the presiding officer, together with any other facts of the
case.
(s) Any provider requesting an
external independent third-party review may withdraw the request for review and
request a state fair hearing within 123 days of the date of the MCO's adequate
notice of appeal resolution.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.