Kan. Admin. Regs. § 74-1-8 - Administration of examination; cheating
(a) Either of the
following actions by a testing candidate shall invalidate any grade otherwise
earned on any test section and may warrant the candidate's summary expulsion
from the test site and disqualification from taking the examination for a
specified period of time:
(1) Failing to
comply with the testing administrator's instructions; or
(2) cheating in applying for or taking the
examination.
(b) The
following actions or attempted actions by a testing candidate may be considered
cheating:
(1) Falsifying or misrepresenting
educational credentials or other information required for admission to the
examination;
(2) any communication
between testing candidates inside or outside the test site or copying another
testing candidate's answers while the examination is in progress;
(3) with the exception of persons associated
with the examination process, any communication with others inside or outside
the test site while the examination is in progress;
(4) the substitution of another person to sit
in the test site in the stead of a testing candidate;
(5) other than those materials provided to
the testing candidate as part of the examination, referring to cribnotes,
textbooks, or any other materials or electronic media inside or outside the
test site while the examination is in progress;
(6) violating the nondisclosure prohibitions
of the examination or aiding or abetting another in doing so; and
(7) retaking or attempting to retake a test
section by an individual holding a valid certificate or by a testing candidate
who has unexpired credit for having already passed the same test section,
unless the individual has been authorized to retake a test section or has been
expressly authorized by the board to do so.
(c) If it appears that a testing candidate
has failed to comply with the testing site administrator's instructions or that
cheating has occurred or is occurring, the testing candidate either may be
summarily expelled by the board or its designee or may be moved to a position
in the testing center away from other testing candidates.
(d) If the board has reason to believe that a
testing candidate either has failed to comply with the testing site
administrator's instructions or has cheated on the examination, an
investigation and a hearing may be conducted by the board to determine whether
the testing candidate will be given credit for any of the test sections and
whether the testing candidate will be barred from taking the examination for a
specified period of time.
(e) If
the board determines that a testing candidate has failed to comply with the
testing site administrator's instructions or that cheating occurred but the
board allows a testing candidate to take any subsequent examinations, any of
the following actions may be taken by the board:
(1) Admonish the testing candidate;
(2) seat the testing candidate in
a segregated location for the rest of the examination;
(3) keep a record of the testing candidate's
seat location and identifying information as well as the names and identifying
information of the testing candidates in close proximity to the candidate; or
(4) provide information concerning
the circumstances of the cheating to the national candidate database, the
American institute of certified public accountants, and the testing center.
(f) Other state
regulatory boards may be notified by the board of the board's findings and any
actions taken against a testing candidate who is refused credit for any test
section, disqualified from taking any test section, or barred from taking the
examination in the future.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.