Kan. Admin. Regs. § 91-1-232 - On-site visits; recommendation; appeal
(a) On-site visits.
(1) After the scheduling of an initial visit,
a continuing accreditation visit, or a focused visit, an on-site review team
shall be appointed by the commissioner. The team shall be appointed at least
one year before the date of the visit. The chairperson of the on-site review
team and the number of on-site review team members shall be designated by the
commissioner. An institution may challenge the appointment of a team member
only on the basis of a conflict of interest.
(2) In accordance with procedures adopted by
the state board, each on-site review team shall examine and analyze the
institutional report, review electronic exhibits, conduct an on-site review of
the teacher education institution, and prepare reports expressing the findings
and conclusions of the review team. The review team reports shall be submitted
to the commissioner. The reports shall be forwarded by the commissioner to the
evaluation review committee and to an appropriate representative of the teacher
education institution.
(3) Any
institution may prepare a written response to a review team report. Each
response shall be prepared and submitted to the commissioner within a
designated time frame following receipt of a review team's report. Each
response shall be forwarded by the commissioner to the evaluation review
committee.
(b)
Recommendation and appeal.
(1) The evaluation
review committee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the state board,
shall prepare a written initial recommendation regarding the appropriate
accreditation status to be assigned to the teacher education institution, which
shall include a statement of the findings and conclusions of the evaluation
review committee. The recommendation shall be submitted to an appropriate
representative of the teacher education institution and to the
commissioner.
(2) Within 30 days of
the receipt of an initial recommendation of the evaluation review committee,
the teacher education institution may submit a written request to the
commissioner for a hearing before the evaluation review committee to appeal the
initial recommendation. This request shall specify, in detail, the basis for
the appeal, including an identification of each item disputed by the
institution.
(3) If a request for a
hearing is submitted according to paragraph (b)(2), the evaluation review
committee shall conduct a hearing. The committee shall then prepare a written
final recommendation regarding the appropriate status to be assigned to the
teacher education institution, which shall include a statement of the findings
and conclusions of the evaluation review committee. The recommendation shall be
submitted to an appropriate representative of the teacher education institution
and to the commissioner. The final recommendation shall be submitted by the
commissioner to the state board for its consideration and
determination.
(4) If a request for
a hearing is not submitted within the time allowed under paragraph (2) of this
subsection, the initial recommendation of the evaluation review committee shall
become the final recommendation of the review committee. The committee's final
recommendation shall be submitted by the commissioner to the state board for
its consideration and determination.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.