Kan. Admin. Regs. § 91-40-9 - Evaluation procedures
(a) If assessment
instruments are used as a part of the evaluation or reevaluation of an
exceptional child, the agency shall ensure that the following requirements are
met:
(1) The assessment instruments or
materials shall meet the following criteria:
(A) Be selected and administered so as not to
be racially or culturally discriminatory; and
(B) be provided and administered in the
child's native language or other mode of communication and in the form most
likely to yield accurate information on what the child knows and can do
academically, developmentally, and functionally, unless this is clearly not
feasible.
(2) Materials
and procedures used to assess a child with limited English proficiency shall be
selected and administered to ensure that they measure the extent to which the
child has an exceptionality and needs special education, rather than measuring
the child's English language skills.
(3) A variety of assessment tools and
strategies shall be used to gather relevant functional and developmental
information about the child, including information provided by the parent, and
information related to enabling the child to be involved and progress in the
general curriculum or, for a preschool child, to participate in appropriate
activities that could assist in determining whether the child is an exceptional
child and what the content of the child's IEP should be.
(4) Any standardized tests that are given to
a child shall meet the following criteria:
(A) Have been validated for the specific
purpose for which they are used; and
(B) be administered by trained and
knowledgeable personnel in accordance with any instructions provided by the
producer of the assessment.
(5) If an assessment is not conducted under
standard conditions, a description of the extent to which the assessment varied
from standard conditions shall be included in the evaluation report.
(6) Assessments and other evaluation
materials shall include those that are tailored to assess specific areas of
educational need and not merely those that are designed to provide a single
general intelligence quotient.
(7)
Assessments shall be selected and administered to ensure that if an assessment
is administered to a child with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills,
the results accurately reflect the child's aptitude or achievement level or
whatever other factors the assessment purports to measure, rather than
reflecting the child's impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills, unless
those skills are the factors that the assessment purports to measure.
(8) A single procedure shall not
be used as the sole criterion for determining whether a child is an exceptional
child and for determining an appropriate educational program for the child.
(9) Each agency shall use
assessment tools and strategies that provide relevant information that directly
assists persons in determining the educational needs of the child.
(b)
(1) Each child shall be assessed in all areas
related to a suspected exceptionality, including, if appropriate, the
following:
(A) Health;
(B) vision;
(C) hearing;
(D) social and emotional status;
(E) general intelligence;
(F) academic performance;
(G) communicative status; and
(H) motor abilities.
(2) Each evaluation shall be sufficiently
comprehensive to identify all of the child's special education and related
services needs, whether or not commonly linked to the disability category in
which the child has been classified.
(c) If a child is suspected of having a
specific learning disability, the agency also shall follow the procedures
prescribed in K.A.R. 91-40-11 in conducting the evaluation of the child.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.