C.M.R. 13, 188, ch. 60, The Strategic Plan For The Restoration Of Shad and Alewives To The Kennebec River Above Augusta - The Strategic Plan For The Restoration Of Shad and Alewives To The Kennebec River Above Augusta

  1. Appendix 188-60-1 - Fish Passage Requirements for Dams on the Mainstem of Kennebec River and Major Tributaries
  2. Appendix 188-60-2 - Obstructions on the Kennebec River from Augusta to Moosehead Lake

The goal of the Kennebec River Anadromous Fish Restoration Plan is:

"To restore the alewife and shad resources to their historical range in the Kennebec River System."

The following objectives addressing this goal have been developed. They are:

I. To achieve an annual production of 6.0 million alewives above Augusta.
II. To achieve an annual production of 725,000 shad above Augusta.

These objectives are based on the projected potential of the Kennebec River from the Augusta dam to the lower dam in Madison including the Sebasticook River, Sandy River, Seven Mile Stream, and Wesserunsett Stream. A more detailed analysis by river segment or tributary can be found in Tables 1 and 2.

The strategy developed to meet these objectives involve restoration planned in two phases.

They are:

1. Phase I- (January 1, 1986 through December 31, 1998)

Require upstream and downstream fish passage facilities at the Edwards Dam (FERC #2389). The upstream fish passage facilities need to be capable of allowing the collection/sorting/transportation of fish in addition to allowing passage. Restoration of alewives will be initiated to selected lakes and ponds in the Seven Mile Stream, Sebasticook River, and Wesserunsett Stream drainages. During Phase I, restoration of alewives will be accomplished by trap and truck. In the event that a fish passage/sorting/transportation facility is not completed by May, 1986 at the Edwards Dam, alewives will be transported from out-of-basin.

Restoration of shad will be initiated to the river segment between the Edwards Dam and the Lockwood Dam. This will be accomplished by requesting a passage facility at the Edwards Dam which will allow the sorting and passage of shad. In the event that a fish passage and sorting facility is not functional by May, 1986, an effort will be made to capture shad in the lower Kennebec River estuary and transport them to the river segment above the Edwards Dam. In addition, shad will be transported from out-of-basin, if available.

Trucking of shad from the Edwards Dam to upriver segments will be initiated five years prior to passage being provided to that segment.

2. Phase II

Starting in 1999, fish passage will be required at all mainstem dams on the Kennebec River up to the Abenaki Dam (FERC #2364) in Madison, on the mainstem dams on the Sebasticook River up to the confluence of the east and west branches, and at the Madison Electric Works Dam on the Sandy River. Passage will be required at one year intervals proceeding upstream with the exceptions that passage will be required concurrently at the Lockwood Dam (FERC #2574), Winslow Dam (FERC #2322), Fort Halifax Dam (FERC #2552), and the proposed Benton Falls Project (FERC 7/5073). The required fish passage in these dams is mainly for the benefit of .American shad and Atlantic salmon.

The feasibility of truck stocking alewives as a substitute for fish passage facilities will be evaluated during Phase I. It may be decided to continue the truck stocking of alewives during Phase II.

The introduction of alewives into the following lakes during Phase II is dependent on the outcome of a joint study by the Maine Department of Marine Resources and the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife: Great Moose Lake, Spectacle Pond, China Lake, Big Indian Pond, Little Indian Pond, Wassokeag Lake, Clearwater Pond, and Norcross Pond. This study is for the purpose of assessing the interactions of alewives with smelts and salmonids. Based upon the results of these studies, a cooperative decision will be made regarding future alewife introductions into the above listed waters.

Table 1: Potential Alewife Production in the Kennebec River above Augusta.

Ponded Area Surface Acreage Total Fish1 Production (235/Acre) Allowable2 Harvest (200/Acre) Spawning3 Escapement (35/Acre)
Seven Mile Stream
Webber Pond 1252 294,220 250,400 43,820
Spectacle Pond 139 32,665 27,800 4,865
Three Mile Pond 1077 253,095 215,400 37,695
Three Cornered Pond 195 45,825 39,000 6,825
TOTAL 2663 625,805 532,600 93,205
Sebasticook River
Douglas Pond 525 123,375 105,000 18,375
China Lake 3922 921,670 784,400 137,270
Pattee Pond 712 167,320 142,400 24,920
Lovejoy Pond 324 76,140 64,800 11,340
Unity Pond 2528 594,080 505,600 88,480
Pleasant Lake 768 180,480 153,600 26,880
Great Moose Lake 3584 842,240 716,800 125,440
Big Indian Pond 990 232,650 198,000 34,650
Little Indian Pond 143 33,605 28,600 5,005
Sebasticook Lake 4288 1,007,680 857,600 150,080
Wassookeag Lake 1062 249,570 212,400 37,170
Plymouth Pond 480 112,800 96,000 16,800
TOTAL 19,326 4,541,610 3,865,200 676,410
Wesserunsett Stream
Hayden Lake 1446 339,810 289,200 50,610
Sandy River
Norcross Pond 122 28,670 24,400 4,270
Clearwater Pond 751 176,485 150,200 26,285
North Pond 170 39,950 34,000 5,950
Parker Pond 128 30,080 25,600 4,480
TOTAL 1171 275,185 234,200 40,985
Grand Total4 24,606 5,782,410 4,921,200 861,210

1Based on an annual commercial yield of 100 pounds per surface acre and an escapement rate of 15%. Average weight of .5 pound/fish

2Assumes 100% fish passage efficiency (upstream and downstream)

3The escapement rate of 35 adult alewives per acre refers to the escapement needed into the pond or lake. Higher rates would be needed downriver depending on the number of dams and fish passage efficiency.

4Assumes there will be 100% survival of downstream migrating juvenile alewives. A 10% mortality at each hydroelectric facility (with downstream passage) would reduce the potential total production from 5,683,641 alewives to 4,047,800

Table 2: Potential shad production in the Kennebec River based on water surface acreage (2.3 shad/100 s(j. yds.)

River Segment Surface Acreage (yd.2) Potential Shad Production1
Mat list cm Augusta Dam to Milstar Dam, Watervj]le 6,872,800 158,074
Sch.i.sl i conk River Halt lax Dam Lo Confluence of Last and W7\st Branches 6,757,080 155,413
Mainstem Kennebec River Scott Paper Company Dam, WaLerville I" Sh.iwmut Dun, FairfieLd 2,531,361 58,221
Mainstem Kennebec River Shawmut Dam, Fairfield to Central Ma me Rower Dam, Skowhegan 6,125,167 140,879
Mainstem Kennebec River Skowhegan Dam to Madison 4,961,583 114,116
Sandy River Mouth to Route //A, bridge in Farrington 4,262,250 98,032
TOTAL: 31,520,241 724,735

1Assumes tbat there will be 100% survival of downstream migrating juvenile shad. A 10% mortality at each hydroelectric facility (with downstream passage) would reduce the total production from 724,735 to 519,759.

Click here to view Image

Notes

C.M.R. 13, 188, ch. 60, The Strategic Plan For The Restoration Of Shad and Alewives To The Kennebec River Above Augusta

State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.


No prior version found.