Mich. Admin. Code R. 281.60 - Variance and variance hearings
Rule 10.
(1) A
dimensional variance from any standard established in these rules may be
granted by the zoning review board after a public hearing or, by the zoning
administrator as provided in these rules, to allow a modification from a
standard that establishes an area, yard, height, floor space, frontage,
setback, or similar numerical restriction, but only after evidence establishes
that a practical difficulty exists in complying with these rules. A variance
shall be granted only when it is consistent with the general purposes and
intent of these rules. Work authorized by the variance shall not commence until
a permit is issued by the zoning administrator.
(2) The zoning review board or zoning
administrator shall consider the following factors to determine if a practical
difficulty exists in order to comply with these rules as specified in subrule
(1) of this rule:
(a) A condition exists on
the property that prevents the development standards from being met.
(b) The practical difficulty cannot be
overcome by some reasonable method other than a variance.
(c) If the practical difficulty cannot be
overcome by some reasonable method other than a variance, the variance shall
meet the standards to the greatest extent possible.
(d) The variance will not cause a substantial
change in the character of the area.
(e) In view of the manner in which the
practical difficulty arose, the interests of justice will be served by allowing
the variance.
(f) The practical
difficulty is due to circumstances which are unique to the subject property and
not self created.
(g) The variance
shall not result in an adverse effect on the environment.
(3) The public hearing and review of a
variance request by the zoning review board may be waived for a minor
dimensional variance for a principal use. Such a variance application shall be
processed by the zoning administrator, who shall consider the factors of
subrule (2) of this rule in making a determination. The zoning administrator
shall prepare a written finding of fact that details the reasons for approval
or denial of the minor variance request. A minor variance is defined as a
reduction in setback for a principal use on any lawful lot that is not more
than 25% of the normal dimensional requirements, a certain variance to expand a
legal nonconforming dwelling or restore a destroyed legal nonconforming
structure as described in
R
281.59 and a setback variance for a single-family
dwelling and short-term rental facility, as described in
R 281.57.
(4) A land use variance is a land or building
use in contravention of any of the use requirements of these rules. The zoning
review board may, after a public hearing, grant a land use variance upon a
finding of unnecessary hardship, which may be found upon evidence being
submitted that all of the following factors exist:
(a) The property cannot be used as
zoned.
(b) The unnecessary hardship
results from the application of these rules to the subject property.
(c) The unnecessary hardship is suffered by
the subject property only and not shared by other property owners.
(d) The unnecessary hardship is not self
created.
(5) Upon
determining that an unnecessary hardship for a land use variance exists, the
zoning review board shall determine that the proposed use meets all of the
following:
(a) The proposed use shall be in
accordance with the natural river plan.
(b) The proposed use will be designed,
constructed, operated, and maintained consistent with the existing or intended
character of the natural river district and the proposed use will not change
the character of the natural river district.
(c) The proposed use will not involve
activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that
may be detrimental to any person, property, or the environmental quality of the
natural river district, such as excessive noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, or
outdoor storage of materials.
(d)
The proposed use will be consistent with the intent and purpose of these
rules.
(e) The proposed use or a
structure to be used will not cause an overcrowding of the land or an undue
concentration of population that may result in degradation to the natural river
district.
(f) The proposed use lot
area is sufficient, appropriate, and adequate for the proposed use and the
reasonable anticipated operation and expansion thereof.
(6) The economic return factor shall be
considered only if the applicant has been deprived of all beneficial use of
subject property under existing zoning. In determining whether reasonable use
may be made of the property as zoned, a reasonable economic return may be
considered, but only if the applicant is in compliance with the provisions of
subrules (1) to (5) of this rule.
(7) Upon receipt of a variance application,
the zoning review board shall conduct a public hearing on the variance
application, except in the case of a minor variance application. The
application, public hearing, and notice procedure shall follow the procedures
in
R
281.55. The zoning review board shall record all its
proceedings, which shall include minutes of meetings, findings, and actions
taken, including the final order. Reasons for the decision shall be in writing.
The zoning review board shall record the vote of each member on each question.
The zoning review board shall record if a member is absent or fails to vote.
All records shall be open for public inspection. The concurring vote of at
least a majority of the eligible voting members of the zoning review board is
required to grant a dimensional variance. The concurring vote of at least a
two-thirds majority of the eligible voting members of the zoning review board
is required to grant a land use. If the required concurring vote for approval
of a variance is not achieved, the variance is denied.
(8) A variance shall create a nonconforming
land use, lot, or structure that is subject to
R
281.59.
(9) The zoning review board or the zoning
administrator may impose permit conditions, in writing, before granting a
variance. The zoning permit issued for the variance is not valid until the
applicant accepts the conditions in writing.
(10) An application for a variance denied by
the zoning review board or zoning administrator shall not be resubmitted for
consideration unless significantly different in scope or new and significant
facts and conditions exist from the previously denied application.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.