Mich. Admin. Code R. 400.3178 - Intentional program violation; disqualification; recoupment
Rule 28.
(1) If, in
the course of an overissuance investigation, the department determines that an
intentional program violation occurred, then the person accused of the
violation shall be notified of all of the following:
(a) The allegation.
(b) A potential penalty.
(c) The right to meet with department
representatives to discuss the allegation.
(2) The department shall conduct an
administrative hearing to determine if an overissuance occurred due to
intentional program violation, unless either of the following provisions
applies:
(a) The person accused of the
violation waives his or her right to the hearing by signing a recoupment and
disqualification agreement.
(b) The
individual has been convicted of the fraudulent receipt of benefits under
section 60 of 1939 PA 280, MCL 400.60, or any other criminal fraud
statute.
(3) If a person
accused of an intentional program violation has agreed to and signed a
recoupment and disqualification agreement, then the person does not have
recourse to further administrative appeal.
(4) A person accused of an intentional
program violation may request a hearing to contest the computation of the
benefit reduction amount, but not the overissuance amount.
(5) The department may conduct an intentional
program violation hearing without the person accused of the violation or his or
her authorized representative present if the hearing notice that was sent to
the person is not returned by the post office as undeliverable.
(6) Any administrative hearing initiated by
the department under this rule shall be conducted pursuant to notice served on
the accused person not later than 6 years after the overissuance
occurred.
(7) If the department
does not establish that an overpayment was the result of an intentional program
violation, then the department shall recoup the overpayment as department or
client error.
(8) A person who is
determined, in an administrative disqualification hearing, to have committed an
intentional program violation, who pleads guilty to an intentional program
violation, who waives his or her legal right to an administrative
disqualification hearing regarding an allegation of intentional program
violation, or who is convicted of criminal fraud based on the fraudulent
receipt of benefits shall be disqualified by reducing the monthly benefit level
by the amount deemed to meet the individual's monthly needs for the following
periods:
(a) A period of 1 year for a first
offense.
(b) A period of 2 years
for a second offense.
(c)
Permanently for a third or subsequent offense.
(9) For current or former state disability
assistance recipients, the department shall impose a disqualification penalty
for an intentional program violation within 5 days of the receipt of a decision
that an intentional program violation occurred.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.