Mich. Admin. Code R. 418.69 - Disqualification and recusal
Rule 9.
(1) A
commissioner may be recused, or disqualified, from a case based on the
existence of bias, prejudice, interest, or any other cause provided for in this
rule.
(2) A commissioner may be
recused in any proceeding in which the impartiality of the commissioner might
reasonably be questioned, including, but not limited to, instances in which the
commissioner:
(a) Has a personal bias or
prejudice concerning a party or a party's attorney.
(b) Has personal knowledge of disputed
evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.
(c) Has been consulted or employed as an
attorney in the matter in controversy.
(d) Is or was a party.
(e) Was, within the preceding 2 years, a
partner of or in an employment relationship with a party.
(f) Was, within the preceding 2 years,
attorney for a party or a member of a law firm representing a party.
(g) Has been a material witness concerning
the matter in controversy.
(3) A commissioner may also be recused in any
proceeding in which the commissioner, the commissioner's spouse, a person
within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of
such a person is:
(a) A party to the
proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party.
(b) Acting as a lawyer in the
proceeding.
(c) Known by the
commissioner to have a more than de minimis financial interest that could be
substantially affected by the proceeding.
(d) To the commissioner's knowledge, likely
to be a material witness in the proceeding.
(4) A commissioner may be disqualified for
any other reason provided by law.
(5) A commissioner who would otherwise be
recused under this rule may disclose to the parties in writing the basis of
disqualification and may ask the parties and their attorneys to consider,
outside the commissioner's presence, whether they wish to waive
disqualification. If following disclosure of any basis for disqualification
other than personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, all parties agree
that the commissioner should not be disqualified, the commissioner may
participate in the proceeding. The existence of the agreement must be
incorporated into the hearing record.
(6) Any party seeking to disqualify a
commissioner shall so move within 30 days after receiving notice that the
commissioner will participate in the proceeding or upon discovering facts
establishing grounds for disqualification, whichever is later. A motion for
recusal must be made in writing and accompanied by an affidavit setting forth
definite and specific allegations demonstrating the facts upon which the motion
for disqualification is based. An untimely motion may be granted for good cause
shown. If a motion is not timely filed, the commission may consider the
untimeliness in deciding whether to grant the motion.
(7) The challenged commissioner shall decide
the motion. If the challenged commissioner denies the motion, the challenging
party may, within 14 days, submit to the challenged commissioner or the
commission chairperson a request that the motion be referred for decision to
another commissioner assigned by the chairperson subject to the following:
(a) If the chairperson is the challenged
commissioner or if the chairperson has an acknowledged conflict of interest,
the commissioner whose participation is not being challenged shall decide the
motion.
(b) If the challenged
commissioner is the only commissioner with no acknowledged conflict of
interest, the motion must be referred to the workers' compensation board of
magistrates for decision by either the chairperson or another magistrate
designated by the chairperson.
(c)
Consideration of a referred motion shall be de novo
.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.