Minn. R. agency 138, ch. 7849, CERTIFICATES OF NEED, pt. 7849.0120 - CRITERIA
A certificate of need must be granted to the applicant on determining that:
A. the probable
result of denial would be an adverse effect upon the future adequacy,
reliability, or efficiency of energy supply to the applicant, to the
applicant's customers, or to the people of Minnesota and neighboring states,
considering:
(1) the accuracy of the
applicant's forecast of demand for the type of energy that would be supplied by
the proposed facility;
(2) the
effects of the applicant's existing or expected conservation programs and state
and federal conservation programs;
(3) the effects of promotional practices of
the applicant that may have given rise to the increase in the energy demand,
particularly promotional practices which have occurred since 1974;
(4) the ability of current facilities and
planned facilities not requiring certificates of need to meet the future
demand; and
(5) the effect of the
proposed facility, or a suitable modification thereof, in making efficient use
of resources;
B. a more
reasonable and prudent alternative to the proposed facility has not been
demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence on the record, considering:
(1) the appropriateness of the size, the
type, and the timing of the proposed facility compared to those of reasonable
alternatives;
(2) the cost of the
proposed facility and the cost of energy to be supplied by the proposed
facility compared to the costs of reasonable alternatives and the cost of
energy that would be supplied by reasonable alternatives;
(3) the effects of the proposed facility upon
the natural and socioeconomic environments compared to the effects of
reasonable alternatives; and
(4)
the expected reliability of the proposed facility compared to the expected
reliability of reasonable alternatives;
C. by a preponderance of the evidence on the
record, the proposed facility, or a suitable modification of the facility, will
provide benefits to society in a manner compatible with protecting the natural
and socioeconomic environments, including human health, considering:
(1) the relationship of the proposed
facility, or a suitable modification thereof, to overall state energy
needs;
(2) the effects of the
proposed facility, or a suitable modification thereof, upon the natural and
socioeconomic environments compared to the effects of not building the
facility;
(3) the effects of the
proposed facility, or a suitable modification thereof, in inducing future
development; and
(4) the socially
beneficial uses of the output of the proposed facility, or a suitable
modification thereof, including its uses to protect or enhance environmental
quality; and
D. the
record does not demonstrate that the design, construction, or operation of the
proposed facility, or a suitable modification of the facility, will fail to
comply with relevant policies, rules, and regulations of other state and
federal agencies and local governments.
Notes
Statutory Authority: MS s 216A.05; 216B.08; 216B.2421; 216B.243; 216C.10
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.