The legal obligation of Federal Agencies to consult with
Tribes on a government-to-government basis begins in the Constitution, in
Article I Section 8, also known as the Commerce Clause, where Congress is
empowered to regulate commerce with foreign governments, between the states and
with the Indian Tribes. In Federal Indian policy, it is unclear whether Tribes
are more like foreign nations or like states, but clearly, the government of
the United States has an obligation to consult with Tribes as sovereign nations
on matters of interest and concern to Tribes. The constitutional mandate is
expressed in statutes, executive orders and the policies of the several Federal
Agencies that touch upon Tribal matters. In brief these are:
1. NHPA requires consultation with Indian
Tribes on places of traditional religious and cultural significance, in
identifying and determining treatment modalities within the area of potential
effect of an undertaking. Consultation is also required with Tribes that have
assumed historic preservation duties as THPOs for sites on Tribal land and with
Tribes on the mitigation of effects to historic and sacred places on federal
land. Section 101(d)(6)(B) of the act requires the Agency official to consult
with any Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that attaches religious
and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by an
undertaking. This requirement applies regardless of the location of the
historic property. Such Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization shall be a
consulting party.
2. National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is directed at the impacts to the human
environment, which includes the social and cultural relationship of people to
the physical environment. Under this law there is an obligation to consult with
Tribes concerning impacts to sacred sites and on the mitigation of actions to
sites of concern to Tribes that is not limited by the National Register
eligibility criteria (
36 C.F.R.
60.4)
3. Archaeological Resources Protection Act
(ARPA) is a law directed at protecting "archaeological" sites for the important
information that can be retrieved, but the law also requires Federal Agencies
to notify Tribes of a permit for excavation on federal land that will include
sites of religious or cultural importance to Tribes. On Indian lands, the
federal Agency must have the permission of the Tribe to issue an ARPA permit.
The federal government has an obligation to keep track of such items when
excavated pursuant to a permit in the event that the "Indian owners" may want
to retrieve them. All fines and civil penalties collected and all items seized
from ARPA civil and criminal prosecutions arising from incidents on Indian
lands must be remitted to the Tribe. The costs of reburial of human remains and
funerary objects disrupted by looters will be added to the restitution sought
from violators.
4. Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) requires that a general summary
of the collection be disseminated to all possibly interested Tribes to
facilitate consultation which can lead to the repatriation and to assist in the
preparation of an itemized inventory of human remains and associated funerary
items. On federal land, Agencies that do not consult with Tribes prior to
exhumation of sites of importance to Tribes and develop an agreement for
"Intentional Excavation," are punished by a mandatory 30 day cessation of work
for each "Inadvertent Discovery," that is a find in the absence of a plan
arrived at through consultation with the impacted Tribes. Consultation is also
required to determine the means of transfer of repatriated items.
5. Executive Order 12875 (1993) Tribal
Governance, specifies that the federal government must consult with Indian
Tribal governments on matters that significantly or uniquely affect Tribal
government. By Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994, the federal government
must consult with federally-recognized Tribal governments prior to taking
actions that will affect those Tribal governments (See below for the current
administration's Executive Memorandum on the Government-to-Government
Relationship).
6. Executive Order
12898 (1994) Environmental Justice, specifies that the federal Agency will
consult with Tribal leaders on steps to be taken to insure that environmental
justice requirements are applied to federally-recognized Tribes. This includes
research to address issues of adverse environmental impact in areas of
low-income and minority populations, which include Tribes generally and with
regard to subsistence consumption of fish and wildlife, which pertain to Tribes
exclusively.
7. Executive Order
13007 (1996) Sacred Sites, applies on federal land and directs the Federal
Agencies to accommodate access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites by
Indian religious practitioners, as well as to avoid adversely affecting the
physical integrity of such sacred sites. Although Federal Agencies must consult
with Tribes to learn the existence of places, which require management
decisions to be made, the directive requires Agencies to maintain the
confidentiality of sacred sites where appropriate for their protection.
8. Executive Order 13084 (1998)
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, reaffirms the
unique government-to-government relationship between Agencies and Tribes. The
Order makes it clear that the obligation is upon the federal government and not
the Tribes to instigate and insure that consultation occurs on a timely basis.
The consultation is defined as an activity to obtain meaningful and timely
input from Tribes on matters that significantly or uniquely affect Tribal
communities. In those instances where Tribal laws exist, the Federal Agencies
are to defer to Tribes and waive Agency control. Further, rulemaking on matters
of concern to Tribes should include consultation with Tribes, necessitating the
development of consensual mechanisms to arrive at agreements. This Executive
Order embodies the complete shift in the enfranchised status of Tribes in the
post-1960 era of Tribal self-determination and sovereignty. (Superseded by E.O.
13175)
9. Executive Order 13175
(2000) Consultation with Indian Tribal Governments, would seem redundant, but
appeared necessary where Agencies were slow to develop Tribal consultation
policies and the courts were slow to enfranchise Tribes. This Order firmly
establishes the policy of the administrative branch of government as one that
institutionalizes regular and meaningful consultation with Tribes in the
development of federal policies affecting Tribes. It directs that Agencies
respect treaty rights and grants wide discretion to Tribes in self-governance
and the development of Tribal policy. Further, this Order directs each Agency
to develop a consultation process. * Executive Memorandum,
Government-to-Government Relationship with Tribal Governments, (September
2004), recognizes the unique legal and political relationship of Tribes, and
reaffirms that each executive department and Agency fully respect the rights of
self-government and self-determination in their working relationships with
federally-recognized Tribal governments.