19 Miss. Code. R. 3-19.09 - Utilization Review Standards
(1) Responsibility
for Obtaining Certification
a. In the absence
of any contractual agreement to the contrary, the enrollee is responsible for
notifying the private review agent in a timely manner and obtaining
certification for health care services, if required by the health benefit plan.
A private review agent shall allow any licensed health care provider, or
responsible patient representative, including a family member, to assist in
fulfilling that responsibility.
b.
To ensure confidentiality, a private review agent must, when contacting a
health care provider's office or facility, or hospital, provide its
certification number, the caller's name, and professional qualification to the
designated utilization review representative in the health care provider's
office or facility, or hospital.
(2) Information Upon Which Utilization Review
is Conducted
a. When conducting routine
prospective and concurrent utilization review, the private review agent shall
collect only the information necessary to certify the admission, procedure or
treatment and length of stay.
b. A
private review agent should not routinely expect hospitals and physicians to
supply numerically codified diagnoses or procedures. The private review agent
may ask for such coding, since if it is known, its inclusion in the data
collected increases the effectiveness of the communication.
c. The private review agent shall not
routinely request copies of medical records on all patients reviewed. During
prospective and concurrent review, copies of medical records should only be
required when a difficulty develops in certifying the medical necessity or
appropriateness of the admission or extension of stay. In those cases, only the
necessary or pertinent sections of the record should be required.
d. Private review agents may request copies
of medical records retrospectively for a number of purposes, including auditing
the services provided, quality assurance, and evaluation of compliance with the
terms of the health benefit plan or Utilization Review provisions. With the
exception of the reviewing of records associated with an appeal or with an
investigation of data discrepancies and unless otherwise provided for by
contract or law, health care providers should be reimbursed the reasonable
direct costs of duplicating requested records for retrospective
review.
e. Private review agents
must comply with prior authorization standards as established by Miss.
Code Ann. §§
83-5-901 through
83-5-937.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in these
standards, a private review agent should limit its initial data requirements to
the following elements:
a. Patient Information
i. Name
ii. Address
iii. Date of Birth
iv. Sex
v. Social Security Number or Patient ID
Number
vi. Name of Carrier or
Plan
vii. Plan ID Number
b. Enrollee Information
i. Name
ii. Address
iii. Social Security Number or Employee ID
Number
iv. Relation to
Patient
v. Employer
vi. Health Benefit Plan
vii. Group Number/Plan ID Number
viii. Other Coverage Available (Workers'
Comp., Medicare, etc.)
c.
Attending Physician/Practitioner Information
i. Name
ii. Address
iii. Phone Number
iv. Degree
v. Specialty/Certification Status
vi. Tax ID or Other ID
Number
d.
Diagnosis/Treatment Information
i. Primary
Diagnosis
ii. Secondary
Diagnosis
iii. Proposed
Procedure(s) or Treatment(s)
iv.
Surgical Assistant Requirement
v.
Anesthesia Requirement
vi. Proposed
Admission or Service Date(s)
vii.
Proposed Procedure Date
viii.
Proposed Length of Stay
e. Clinical Information. Sufficient
information for support of appropriateness and level of service
proposed
f. Facility Information
i. Type (such as in-patient, out-patient,
rehab, etc.)
ii. Status (DRG exempt
status, as needed)
iii.
Name
iv. Address
v. Phone Number
vi. Tax ID or Other ID Number
g. Concurrent (Continued Stay)
Review Information
i. Clinical Contact
Person
ii. Additional Days/Services
Proposed
iii. Reasons for
Extension
iv. Diagnosis
(same/changed)
v. Clinical
Information (Sufficient to support, as above)
h. Admissions to Facilities Other Than Acute
Medical/Surgical Hospitals
i. History of
Present Illness
ii. Patient
Treatment Plan and Goals
iii.
Prognosis
iv. Staff
Qualifications
v. 24 Hour
Availability of Staff
i.
Compliance with prior authorization standards as established by Miss.
Code Ann. §§
83-5-901 through
83-5-937.
(4) Special Situations
a. Additional information may be required for
other specific review functions such as discharge planning or catastrophic case
management. Second opinion information may also be required, when applicable,
sufficient to support benefit plan requirements.
b. Information in addition to that described
in this section may be requested by the private review agent or voluntarily
submitted by the provider, when there is significant lack of agreement between
the private review agent and health care provider regarding the appropriateness
of certification during the review or appeal process. "Significant lack of
agreement" means that the private review agent has:
i. Tentatively determined, through its
professional staff, that a service cannot be certified;
ii. Referred the case to a physician for
review; and
iii. Talked to or
attempted to talk to the attending physician for further information.
c. A private review agent should
share all clinical and demographic information on individual patients among its
various divisions (e.g., certification, discharge planning, case management) to
avoid duplicate requests for information from enrollee or providers.
(5) Procedures For Review
Determination
a. Each private review agent
shall have written procedures to ensure that reviews are conducted in a timely
manner and as expeditiously as the enrollee's condition requires.
b. Each private review agent shall make
utilization reviews of prior authorization after obtaining all necessary
information within pursuant to the timeframes establish in Rule 19.09(6) for
nonurgent circumstances and Rule 19.09(7) for urgent circumstances, unless a
longer minimum time frame is required under federal law for the health
insurance issuer and the health care service at issue. Collection of the
necessary information may necessitate a discussion with the attending physician
or, based on the requirements of the health benefit plan, may involve a
completed second opinion review.
c.
A private review agent may review ongoing inpatient stays, but shall not
routinely conduct daily review on all such stays. The frequency of the review
for extension of the initial determination should vary based on the severity or
complexity of the patient's condition or on necessary treatment and discharge
planning activity. Routine concurrent review generally should not be necessary
earlier than 24 hours prior to the lapse of the certified length of
stay.
d. Each private review agent
shall have in place written procedures for providing notification of its
determination regarding certification, recertification, or extensions of
previously authorized length of stay in accordance with the following:
i. When an initial determination is made to
certify, notification shall be provided promptly either by telephone or in
writing, via letter or electronic mail, to the attending physician. The
notification shall be transmitted in writing to the hospital and attending
physician, as well as to the enrollee or patient, within two working
days.
ii. A determination to
certify resulting from concurrent review shall be transmitted to the attending
physician by telephone or in writing within one working day of receipt of all
information necessary to complete the review process or prior to the end of the
current certified period.
iii. If a
private review agent transmits written confirmation of certification for
continued hospitalization, that notification shall include the number of
extended days, the new total number of days approved, and the date of
admission.
iv. When a determination
is made not to certify a hospital or surgery facility admission or extension of
a hospital stay or other service requiring review determination, the attending
physician shall be notified by telephone within one working day and a written
notification should be sent within one working day to the hospital, attending
physician and the enrollee or patient. The written notification shall include
the principal reason(s) for the determination and the way to initiate an appeal
of the determination if the enrollee, patient, or their representative so
chooses. Reasons for a determination not to certify shall include, among other
things, the lack of adequate information to certify after a reasonable attempt
has been made to contact the attending physician.
(6) Utilization review of prior
authorizations in nonurgent circumstances. If a health insurance
issuer requires prior authorization of a health care service, the health
insurance issuer must make an approval or adverse determination and notify the
enrollee, the enrollee's health care professional, and the enrollee's health
care provider of the approval or adverse determination as expeditiously as the
enrollee's condition requires but no later than seven (7) calendar days after
obtaining all necessary information to make the approval or adverse
determination, unless a longer minimum time frame is required under federal law
for the health insurance issuer and the health care service at issue. As used
in this section, "necessary information" includes the results of any
face-to-face clinical evaluation, second opinion or other clinical information
that is directly applicable to the requested service that may be required.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, health insurance
issuers must comply with the requirements of Miss. Code Ann. §
83-9-6.3 to respond by two (2)
business days for prior authorization requests for pharmaceutical services and
products.
(7) Utilization review of
prior authorizations in urgent circumstances.
a. If requested by a treating health care
provider or health care professional for an enrollee, a health insurance issuer
must render an approval or adverse determination concerning urgent health care
services and notify the enrollee, the enrollee's health care professional and
the enrollee's health care provider of that approval or adverse determination
as expeditiously as the enrollee's condition requires but no later than
forty-eight (48) hours after receiving all information needed to complete the
review of the requested health care services, unless a longer minimum time
frame is required under federal law for the health insurance issuer and the
urgent health care service at issue.
b. To facilitate the rendering of a prior
authorization determination in conformance with this section, a health
insurance issuer must establish a mechanism to ensure health care professionals
have access to appropriately trained and licensed clinical personnel who have
access to physicians for consultation, designated by the plan to make such
determinations for prior authorization concerning urgent care
services.
(8)
Notwithstanding language to the contrary elsewhere contained herein, if a
licensed physician certifies in writing to an insurer within seventy-two (72)
hours of an admission that the insured person admitted was in need of immediate
hospital care for emergency services, such shall constitute a prima facie case
of the medical necessity of the admission. To overcome this, the entity
requesting the utilization review and/or the private review agent must show by
clear and convincing evidence that the admitted person was not in need of
immediate hospital care.
(9)
Private review agents shall have in place written procedures to address the
failure of a health care provider, patient, or their representative to provide
the necessary information for review. If the patient or provider will not
release the necessary information to the Utilization Review Organization, the
Utilization Review Organization may deny certification in accordance with its
own policy or that of the health benefit plan.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.