30 Miss. Code. R. 2901-9.1 - Adequate Examination
(a) In order to
insure an adequate examination in the initial examination of the patient, the
optometrist or therapeutic optometrist shall make and record, if possible, the
following findings of the condition of the patient:
(1) case history (ocular, physical,
occupational, and other pertinent information);
(2) visual acuity;
(3) biomicroscopy slit lamp examination
(lids, cornea, sclera, etc.);
(4)
internal ophthalmoscopic examination (media, fundus, etc.);
(5) static retinoscopy, O.D., O.S., or
autorefrector;
(6) subjective
findings, far point and near point;
(7) assessment of binocular
function;
(8) amplitude or range of
accommodation;
(9)
tonometry;
(10) field of vision, to
right and to left.
(b)
In order to insure an adequate contact lens exam, the optometrist or
therapeutic optometrist shall preform following items in addition to 9.1 (a).
(1) perform and record keratometry
testing.
(2) must schedule one
follow-up visit for examination within 30 days of the contact lens fitting, and
must inform the patient on the initial visit regarding the requirement of the
follow-up care.
(3) must observe
proper hygiene in the handling and dispensing of the contact lenses and in the
conduct of the examination. Proper hygiene includes sanitary office conditions,
running water in the office where contact lenses are dispensed and proper
sterilization of diagnostic lenses and instruments.
(4) must instruct the patient in the proper
care of lenses, including proper hygiene.
(c) Basic Competence Violations.
(1) The omission of a single, essential
finding shall be reason for an investigational hearing or informal conference.
The following findings are essential in the initial examination of a patient:
(a) Biomicroscopy slit lamp examination
(lids, cornea, sclera, etc.);
(b)
Internal ophthalmoscopic examination (media, fundus, etc.);
(c) Subjective findings, far point and near
point;
(d) Tonometry.
(2) The omission of a total of
four significant findings in the initial examination of a patient shall be
reason for an investigational hearing or informal conference. The following
findings are significant in the initial examination of a patient:
(a) Case history (ocular, physical,
occupational and other pertinent information);
(b) Visual acuity;
(c) Static retinoscopy, O.D., O.S., or
autorefractor;
(d) Assessment of
binocular function;
(e) Amplitude
or range of accommodation;
(f)
Angle of Vision, to right and to left.
(3) All other omissions or combination of
omissions of findings shall be reason to send noncompliance letters. The
absence of the optometrist's or therapeutic optometrist's signature on the
prescription shall be considered an omission.
(4) An investigational hearing or informal
conference is required when a second alleged violation has occurred. Likewise,
if a licensee has had a previous investigational hearing or informal
conference, a subsequent complaint may result in a formal disciplinary
hearing.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.