N.M. Admin. Code § 1.4.1.76 - STANDARDS OF RESPONSIBILITY
A.
Standards for bidders: Factors to be considered in determining whether the
standard of responsibility has been met include whether a bidder has:
(1) submitted a responsive bid;
(2) adequate financial resources, production
or service facilities, personnel, service reputation and experience to make
satisfactory delivery of the services, construction, or items of tangible
personal property described in the IFB;
(3) a satisfactory record of
performance;
(4) a satisfactory
record of integrity;
(5) qualified
legally to contract with the state; and
(6) supplied all necessary information and
data in connection with any inquiry concerning responsibility.
B. Standards for offerors: Factors
to be considered in determining whether the standard of responsibility has been
met include whether an offeror has:
(1)
submitted a responsive proposal;
(2) adequate financial resources, production
or service facilities, personnel, service reputation and experience to make
satisfactory delivery of the services or items of tangible personal property
described in the proposal;
(3) a
satisfactory record of performance;
(4) a satisfactory record of
integrity;
(5) qualified legally to
contract with the state; and
(6)
supplied all necessary information and data in connection with any inquiry
concerning responsibility.
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.