N.M. Admin. Code § 13.22.2.12 - GRANT AWARDS
The NMATPA board shall award grants on a competitive basis, subject to available funding, and in accordance with the priorities described in this rule. There shall be no automatic entitlement to a grant, and the board shall not be required to award a grant if no application satisfies the criteria set forth in the applicable grant announcement.
A.
Use of the NMATPA GMG. The
board shall review applications consistent with Section
59A-16C-17 NMSA 1978, these
rules, and the guidance set out in the most current version of the NMATPA
GMG.
B.
Multi-jurisdictional
priority. The board shall give priority to those grant applications
representing multi-jurisdictional programs. Applicants representing multiple
jurisdictions may submit joint applications.
C.
Minimum description required.
An application shall, at a minimum, provide a thorough description of the type
of automobile theft prevention, enforcement, specialized training, prosecution,
or first-time offender rehabilitation program proposed. The minimum description
shall include staffing, objectives, measurable goals and costs.
D.
Applicable review guidelines.
The board shall review each application to determine whether the submitting
entity meets the definition of a qualified applicant. The board will then
further review the applications received pursuant to the following guidelines:
(1) Whether the application identifies an
automobile theft problem clearly, is measurable, and is supported by relevant
statistical evidence;
(2) whether
the application minimizes duplicative or overlapping existing
programs;
(3) whether the
application provides a design wherein activities and goals are realistic and
attainable;
(4) whether the
application displays innovation in its concept, design, or operation. A project
is considered innovative if it provides a new and different strategy or
approach that prevents, deters, intervenes or reduces the occurrence of
automobile theft-related activity;
(5) whether the application demonstrates a
realistic cost structure as compared to its goals (cost compared to
benefit);
(6) whether the
application includes a proposed evaluation design supported by relevant data to
measure the effectiveness of the project and a plan for completing said
evaluation consistent with applicable grant reporting requirements;
and
(7) whether the application was
submitted timely and in the prescribed format in accordance with the applicable
grant announcement.
E.
Equitable review. The board will apply relevant statutes, this
rule and the NMATPA GMG to ensure equitable review of grant applications
received from law enforcement agencies and other qualified
applicants.
F.
Geographic
distribution. The board will approve grants in a variety of geographic
areas of the state to the extent that it is practicable to do so.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.