N.M. Admin. Code § 8.248.500.13 - COUNTABLE RESOURCES
Before a resource can be considered countable, the three criteria listed below must be met.
A.
Ownership interest: An applicant/recipient must have an ownership interest in a
resource for it to be countable. The fact that an applicant/recipient has
access to a resource, or has a legal right to use it, does not make it
countable unless the applicant/recipient also has an ownership interest in
it.
B. Legal right to convert
resource to cash: An applicant/recipient must have the legal ability to spend
the funds or to convert non-cash resources into cash.
(1) Physical possession of resource: The fact
that an applicant/recipient does not have physical possession of a resource
does not mean it is not their resource. If they have the legal ability to spend
the funds or convert the resource to cash, the resource is considered
countable. Physical possession of savings bonds is a legal requirement for
cashing them.
(2) Unrestricted use
of resource: An applicant/recipient is considered to have free access to the
unrestricted use of a resource even if he can take those actions only through
an agent, such as a representative payee or guardian.
(3) If there is a legal bar to the sale of a
resource, such as a co-owner legally blocking the sale of jointly owned
property, the resource is not countable. The applicant/recipient is not
required to undertake litigation in order to accomplish the sale.
C. Legal ability to use a
resource: If a legal restriction exists which prevents the use of a resource
for the applicant/recipient's own support and maintenance, the resource is not
countable.
D. Jointly-held account:
If the applicant/spouse is the only subsidy claimant or subsidy recipient who
is an account holder on a jointly held account, the state will presume that all
of the funds in the account belong to the applicant/spouse. If more than one
subsidy claimant or subsidy recipient are account holders, the state will
presume that the funds in the account belong to those individuals in equal
shares. If the applicant/spouse disagrees with the ownership presumption
described in this subsection, they may rebut the presumption. Rebuttal is a
procedure that permits an individual to furnish evidence and establish that
some or all of the funds in the jointly-held account do not belong to
them.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.