N.M. Admin. Code § 8.371.7.30 - ACTIVITY 16: ALTERNATE COMMUNITY SERVICE PROVIDE R SELECTION
A. An ITP quality
assurance review meeting shall be held within 30 - 45 days prior to the
placement date specified in the ITP. The purpose of this meeting is to assure
that the ITP is being successfully implemented, assigned responsibilities have
been or are being met and that activities are appropriately accomplished in
preparation for the community placement. Participants at the ITPQA review
meeting are the same TIDT members, including designated representatives, who
were responsible for the development of the ITP. The Jackson
transition representative (JTR) is responsible for documenting activities at
this meeting. Activities occurring at this meeting include:
(1) review of ITP objectives that occur prior
to placement and their implementation status;
(2) confirm accomplishment or initiation of
tasks by TIDT members;
(3)
amendments to the ITP, if required, due to failure to implement objectives or a
change in the individual's circumstances;
(4) confirm identity of housemates, staff and
others;
(5) confirm cross-over
training agenda, participants and schedule with the facility;
(6) describe and plan activities of the
actual transition day, including responsible parties and times;
(7) recommend a change in placement date, if
required, to assure a successful transition;
(8) finalization of the waiver plan of care:
The case manager shall obtain signatures on the completed approved plan of
care, based upon the approved cost proposals.
B. The TIDT may review the placement date and
recommend a change or extension beyond the 228 day placement requirement;
however, changing the originally established placement date requires
authorization of the Jackson coordinator. Such authorization
shall only be given upon evidence of extraordinary circumstances, a judicial
stay order or other due process activity.
C. Within two working days following the
ITPQA review meeting, the case manager shall submit the completed plan of care
with original signatures to the community programs bureau (CPB).
D. In addition to the regularly scheduled
ITPQA review meeting, described above, the case manager may, in extraordinary
circumstances, reconvene the TIDT, in person or by teleconference if planning
activity time lines fall behind schedule, the implementation of the ITP is in
jeopardy, or the ITP requires significant modification, such as substitution of
a key community service provider. In the case of such reconvened TIDT meetings,
the assigned Jackson transition representative (JTR) will not
attend the meeting, and the case manager shall be responsible for documenting
the amendments to the ITP that are developed. Amendments should be distributed,
in a hand-written form, to all TIDT members and designated representatives at
the conclusion of the meeting, if xerox capabilities are available.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.