Ohio Admin. Code 123:1-76-10 - Reasonable suspicion testing
(A) Where there is reasonable suspicion to
believe that an employee, when appearing for duty or on the job, is under the
influence of, or his/her job performance is impaired by, alcohol or other
drugs, the employee may be required to submit a urine specimen for testing for
the presence of drugs or a breath sample for testing for the presence of
alcohol.
(B) Such reasonable
suspicion must be based upon objective facts or specific circumstances found to
exist that present a reasonable basis to believe that an employee is under the
influence of, or is using or abusing, alcohol and/or other drugs. Examples of
reasonable suspicion shall include, but need not be limited to, slurred speech,
disorientation, and abnormal conduct or behavior.
(C) Reasonable suspicion must be documented
in writing according to procedures prescribed in applicable federal
regulations, any applicable collective bargaining agreement covering the
employee or, in the absence of any such regulations or agreement, by procedures
developed by the director of the department of administrative
services.
(D) Reasonable suspicion
testing shall also include incident-based accident or unsafe practice testing
wherein employees involved in on-the-job accidents or who engage in unsafe
on-duty job-related activities that pose a danger to themselves, to others, or
the overall operation of the agency may be subject to testing. Such
incident-based reasonable suspicion testing shall be for conditions and
situations and according to procedures prescribed by applicable collective
bargaining agreements covering the employee or, in the absence of any such
agreement, according to conditions and procedures developed by the director of
the department of administrative services. Employees subject to federal testing
procedures will submit to federal post-accident testing as required by federal
regulations.
(E) The employee shall
be asked to provide the urine sample or submit to a breath test for alcohol in
accordance with criteria delineated in the applicable collective bargaining
agreement for the employee or, in the absence of any such agreement, according
to criteria developed by the director of the department of administrative
services or as required by federal regulations.
(F) Supervisors and managers shall be trained
to address the abuse of alcohol or other drugs by employees, to recognize facts
that give rise to reasonable suspicion, and the proper procedures for
documenting facts and circumstances to support a finding of reasonable
suspicion as required by collective bargaining agreements or, in the absence of
any such agreements, by the director of the department of administrative
services. Failure to receive such training shall not, however, invalidate
otherwise proper reasonable suspicion testing.
(G) Employees shall be given the opportunity
as required by applicable collective bargaining agreements or, in the absence
of such agreements, as stipulated by the director of the department of
administrative services to offer an explanation or submit medical documentation
of legally prescribed medications, legally recommended
medical marijuana, or exposure to toxic substances which may explain a
positive test result. Such information shall be reviewed only by the medical
review officer in his/ her determination of the validity of a positive
confirmatory test and shall be released to the employer only to explain a test
result.
Notes
Promulgated Under: 119.03
Statutory Authority: 124.09
Rule Amplifies: 124.09, 124.34
Prior Effective Dates: 06/14/1992, 07/26/2002, 11/09/2018
Promulgated Under: 119.03
Statutory Authority: 124.09
Rule Amplifies: 124.09, 124.34
Prior Effective Dates: 06/14/1992, 07/26/2002
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.