Dismissal of an administrative librarian may be effected only
according to procedures set forth in paragraph (B)(2) of this rule and only for
reasons set forth in paragraph (B)(1) of this rule or a relevant provision of
the Revised Code.
(1) Causes of
dismissal based on charges
(a) Professional
incompetence
(b) Substantial,
willful and persistent neglect, without justification or excuse, of an
essential institutional duty, validly prescribed by the university
(c) Conviction of a crime involving moral
turpitude
(d) Proscribed behavior
under paragraph (A)(1) of rule
3344-62-06 of the Administrative
Code
(e) Fraudulent
credentials
(2)
Dismissal procedures
(a) Dismissal procedures
against a librarian shall be initiated by notification by registered mail of
intent to dismiss with supporting reasons sent to the librarian by the
university president's delegate, hereinafter, referred to as the
administration.
(b) The affected
librarian shall have the right to appeal the intended dismissal before a formal
hearing committee. The committee for this appeal shall be the librarian review
committee (LRC) that shall be created in the event that a case arises. Such a
request for appeal shall be made in writing to the administration by the
affected librarian within ten working days after notification of intent to
dismiss.
(c) If the librarian does
request a hearing, the librarian shall respond to the reasons stated for the
intended dismissal in writing within ten working days after making the request
for the hearing or the right to a hearing is waived.
(d) If the librarian does request a hearing,
the LRC, in consultation with the administration and the librarian, will
exercise its judgment as to whether the hearing should be public or
private.
(e) During the proceedings
the librarian shall be permitted to have an adviser of the librarian's own
choice.
(f) The burden of proof
that adequate cause exists rests with the university and shall be satisfied by
a preponderance of the evidence in the record considered as a whole.
(g) The LRC may grant adjournments to enable
either party to investigate evidence to which a valid claim of surprise is
made.
(h) The LRC shall have access
to all documentation and witnesses that will be of benefit to it in formulating
its recommendation.
(i) The
librarian will be afforded the opportunity to obtain necessary witnesses and
documentary or other evidence, and the administration will, insofar as it is
possible with due regard for confidentiality and privileged information, secure
the cooperation of such witnesses and make available necessary documents and
other evidence within its control.
(j) The librarian and the administration
shall have the right to confront and cross-examine all witnesses insofar as
possible. Where a witness cannot or will not appear, and the LRC determines
that the interests of justice require admission of the witnesses statement, the
committee will identify the witness and disclose the witnesses
statement.
(k) In the hearing of an
appeal of intended dismissal for professional incompetence, the testimony may
include that of qualified librarians from the university or other
libraries.
(l) The LRC will not be
bound by the jury trial rules of evidence and may admit any evidence that is of
probative value in determining the issues involved. Every possible effort will
be made to obtain the most reliable evidence available.
(m) The LRC's findings of fact and decision
shall be based solely on the hearing record.
(n) Except for such simple announcements as
may be required covering the time of the hearing and similar matters, public
statements and publicity about the case by either the librarian or the
administration will be avoided as far as possible until the proceedings have
been completed.
(o) The
administration and the librarian shall be notified of the decision in
writing.
(p) If the LRC concludes
that adequate cause for dismissal has not been established by the evidence in
the record, it will so report to the administration. If the LRC concludes that
dismissal is not appropriate in a particular case, it may recommend a lesser
penalty to the administration with supporting reasons. If the administration
rejects the report, it will state the reasons for doing so, in writing, to the
LRC and to the librarian and provide an opportunity for response.
(q) Until the final decision upon dismissal
has been reached, the librarian may be suspended or assigned to other duties in
lieu of suspension, if no immediate harm to the librarian or others is
threatened by the continuance of service, and the librarian is able to render
effective service during the duration of the proceedings. Salary will continue
during a period of suspension.