Ground water.
[Comment: Per paragraph (A)(5) of this rule, this paragraph
does not apply to a scrap tire fire involving less than ten thousand passenger
tire equivalents (PTEs), unless otherwise required by the director, an approved
board of health, or a court of law.]
(1) General applicability. The responsible
individual shall implement a "ground water monitoring program" capable of
determining the impact of open burning of scrap tires on the quality of ground
water occurring within the first continuous significant zone of saturation
underlying the scrap tire fire site.
(a) A
"ground water quality assessment monitoring program" will be required when ten
thousand or more PTEs, as defined in appendix I of rule
3745-27-61
of the Administrative Code) have caught fire, unless otherwise directed by the
director or his authorized representative, an approved board of health, or a
court of law. A "ground water quality assessment monitoring program" includes,
but is not limited to:
(i) A ground water
monitoring system in accordance with paragraph (G)(2) of this rule.
(ii) Sampling and analysis procedures in
accordance with paragraph (G)(3) of this rule.
(iii) A "ground water quality assessment
monitoring plan" in accordance with paragraph (G)(4) of this rule.
(iv) Determinations of rate, extent, and
concentration of contaminants caused by open burning of scrap tires and
detected in the ground water in accordance with paragraph (G)(4)(e) of this
rule.
(v) Notification to persons
residing on or owning land above the contaminant plume in accordance with
paragraph (G)(4)(i) of this rule.
(vi) Submission of a "ground water quality
assessment report" in accordance with paragraph (G)(4)(f) of this
rule.
(b) A "corrective
measures program" will be required to remediate ground water contamination when
contaminants due to open burning of scrap tires have entered the ground water.
A "corrective measures program" includes, but is not limited to:
(i) A ground water monitoring system in
accordance with paragraph (G)(2) of this rule.
(ii) Sampling and analysis procedures in
accordance with paragraph (G)(3) of this rule.
(iii) A "corrective measures plan" in
accordance with paragraph (G)(5) of this rule.
(iv) Proposed concentration levels in
accordance with paragraph (G)(5)(g) of this rule.
(v) A public meeting held to discuss the
results of the "ground water quality assessment report" and "corrective
measures plan" with interested persons in accordance with paragraph (G)(5)(d)
of this rule.
(vi) Selection and
implementation of a corrective measure in accordance with paragraph (G)(5)(j)
of this rule.
(c)
Implementation of "ground water quality assessment monitoring program" and
"corrective measures program." The responsible individual shall implement a
"ground water quality assessment monitoring program" and/or a "corrective
measures program" when required by paragraph (G)(4) or (G)(5) of this rule to
implement these programs. Implementation shall be in accordance with the time
frames specified in paragraphs (G)(4) and (G)(5) of this rule.
(d) For the purposes of this rule, the
assessment monitoring and corrective measures programs are implemented upon the
commencement of sampling of ground water monitoring wells in accordance with
paragraph (G)(3), (G)(4), or (G)(5) of this rule.
(e) A qualified ground water scientist shall
certify, in accordance with
paragraph (I)(2)(h)
of rule
3745-27-09
of the Administrative Code, the "ground water monitoring plan," the "ground
water quality assessment plan," and the "corrective measures plan," and any
revisions thereof, submitted in accordance with this rule.
(2) Ground water monitoring system.
(a) The ground water monitoring system, for
assessment monitoring or corrective measures shall consist of a sufficient
number of wells installed at appropriate locations and depths to yield ground
water samples from the first continuous significant zone of saturation and all
significant zones of saturation that exist above the first continuous
significant zone of saturation underlying the scrap tire fire site that include
both of the following:
(i) Represent the
quality of the background ground water that has not been affected by past or
present operations at the site or facility.
(ii) Represent the quality of the ground
water passing directly downgradient of the area affected by the open burning of
scrap tires.
(b) The
responsible individual shall establish background ground water quality, unless
the exception in paragraph (G)(2)(c) of this rule applies, by analyzing ground
water samples collected from hydraulically upgradient well(s) for each of the
parameters required to be sampled in accordance with paragraph (G)(4)(d) of
this rule.
(c) Background ground
water quality at a site or facility may be based on sampling of wells that are
not hydraulically upgradient where both of the following apply:
(i) Hydrogeologic conditions do not allow the
responsible individual to determine which wells are upgradient.
(ii) Sampling of other wells will provide an
indication of background ground water quality that is as representative or more
representative than that provided by upgradient wells.
(d) All monitoring wells shall be designed,
installed, and developed in a manner that allows the collection of ground water
samples that are representative of ground water quality in the geologic unit
being monitored and at a minimum, do all of the following:
(i) Monitoring wells shall be cased in a
manner that maintains the integrity of the monitoring well boreholes.
(ii) The annular space (i.e., the space
between the borehole and the well casing) above the sampling depth shall be
sealed to prevent the contamination of the samples and the ground
water.
(iii) The casing shall be
screened or perforated and surrounded by sand or gravel in such a way that
allows all of the following:
(a) For the
minimization of the passage of formation materials into the well.
(b) For the monitoring of discrete portions
of the first continuous significant zone of saturation.
(c) The monitoring wells, piezometers, and
other measurement, sampling, and analytical devices shall be operated and
maintained to perform to design specifications throughout the life of the
monitoring program.
(e) The number,
spacing, and depth of ground water monitoring wells shall be based on
site-specific hydrogeologic information including, but not limited to, that
information listed in paragraphs
(C)(2)(a)
(C)(3)(a) to
(C)(2)(e)
(C)(3)(e) of rule
3745-27-06
of the Administrative Code.
(f) The
responsible individual shall, at least annually, evaluate the ground water
surface elevation data obtained in accordance with paragraph (G)(3)(c) of this
rule to determine whether the requirements of paragraph (G)(2) of this rule for
locating the monitoring wells continue to be satisfied. If the evaluation shows
that paragraph (G)(2) of this rule is no longer satisfied, the responsible
individual shall immediately revise the number, location, and/or depth of the
monitoring wells to bring the ground water monitoring system into compliance
with this requirement.
(3) Ground water sampling, analysis, and data
evaluation methods.
(a) General requirements.
The assessment monitoring program and corrective measures program shall include
consistent sampling and analysis procedures that are protective of human health
and the environment and that are designed to ensure monitoring results that
provide an accurate representation of ground water quality at the background
and downgradient wells installed in accordance with paragraphs (G)(2), (G)(3),
(G)(4) and (G)(5) of this rule. The "ground water quality assessment monitoring
plan," and "corrective measures plan" shall include both of the following:
(i) A written sampling and analysis plan
which documents the sampling and analysis procedures employed in the "ground
water quality assessment monitoring program," and the "corrective measures
program."
(ii) Submission of ground
water analysis shall be in accordance with paragraph (G)(3)(e) of this
rule.
(b) A sampling and
analysis plan shall, at a minimum, include a detailed description of the
equipment, procedures, and techniques to be used for all of the following:
(i) Measurement of ground water
elevations.
(ii) Detection of
immiscible layers.
(iii) Collection
of ground water samples, including all of the following:
(a) Well evacuation.
(b) Sample withdrawal.
(c) Sample containers and handling.
(d) Sample preservation.
(iv) Performance of field analysis, including
procedures and form for recording data and the exact location, time, and
site-specific conditions associated with the data acquisition.
(v) Decontamination of equipment.
(vi) Methods for ground water sample analysis
for all constituents due to open burning of tires at the site or facility,
including all constituents listed in appendix I of this rule.
(vii) Chain of custody control consisting of
both of the following:
(a) Standardized field
tracking reporting forms to record sample custody in the field prior to and
during shipment.
(b) Prepared
sample labels containing all information necessary for effective sample
tracking.
(viii) Field
and laboratory quality assurance and quality control including all of the
following:
(a) Collection of duplicate
samples.
(b) Submission of
field-bias blanks.
(c) Potential
interferences.
(c) Measurement of
ground water elevations. Ground water elevations shall be measured in all wells
prior to any purging and sampling. The responsible individual shall determine,
for the significant zone of saturation monitored, the direction of ground water
flow each time ground water elevation measurements are performed. Ground water
elevations in wells monitoring this unit shall be measured within a period of
time short enough to avoid temporal variations in ground water flow which could
preclude an accurate determination of ground water flow rate and direction. The
responsible individual shall annually evaluate the ground water elevation data
collected pursuant to this paragraph in accordance with paragraph (G)(2)(d) of
this rule.
(d) The responsible
individual shall determine whether or not there is an increase from background
values for each parameter in appendix I of this rule. The responsible
individual shall make this determination each time they assess ground water
quality. To determine whether a significant increase has occurred, the
responsible individual shall compare the ground water quality of each parameter
in appendix I of this rule at each downgradient ground water monitoring well to
the background value of that parameter. The responsible individual may use any
one or more of the data evaluation procedures specified in paragraph
(G)(4)(c)(iv) of this rule.
(e)
Submission of results. All ground water elevation, sample analysis results and
ground water quality evaluation data generated in accordance with paragraphs
(G)(2), (G)(3), (G)(4), and (G)(5) of this rule shall be submitted to the
appropriate Ohio EPA district office not later than seventy-five days after
sampling the well. All ground water data and an accompanying text shall be
submitted to the appropriate Ohio EPA district office in a form specified by
Ohio EPA.
(4) Ground water quality assessment
monitoring program.
(a) General requirements.
Ground water quality assessment monitoring is required if ten thousand or more
PTEs have caught fire. Additionally, assessment monitoring may be required in
the event that the results from an initial screening conducted by the field
inspector indicate a possible release to the ground water underlying the site
or facility. If ten thousand or more PTEs have caught fire, or a release to
ground water is indicated, unless otherwise required by the director, an
approved board of health, or a court of law, the responsible individual for a
site or facility shall implement a "ground water quality assessment monitoring
program" capable of determining the concentration, rate, and extent of
migration of contaminants in the ground water due to open burning of tires at
the site or facility. The responsible individual shall implement the "ground
water quality assessment monitoring program" in accordance with the "ground
water quality assessment plan" and any other requirements identified by the
director.
(b) Within ninety days of
the start of the fire, the responsible individual shall submit to the director
a "ground water quality assessment plan" for implementing the "ground water
quality assessment program" at the site or facility.
(c) The "ground water quality assessment
plan" shall include, at a minimum, detailed descriptions of the following:
(i) Hydrogeologic conditions at the site or
facility.
(ii) The investigatory
approach to be followed during the assessment, including but not limited to the
all of the following:
(a) The proposed
number, location, depth, installation method, and construction of any
assessment monitoring wells deemed necessary.
(b) The proposed method(s) for gathering
additional hydrogeologic information.
(c) The planned use of supporting methodology
(i.e., soil gas or geophysical surveys).
(iii) A sampling and analysis plan as
required in paragraph (G)(3)(b) of this rule.
(iv) Data evaluation procedures, including
but not limited to all of the following:
(a)
Planned use of computer models.
(b)
Planned use of previously gathered information.
(c) Planned use of statistical
methods.
(d) Planned use of data
display (e.g., stiff or piper) diagrams.
(e) Criteria which will be utilized to
determine if additional assessment activities are warranted.
(v) Schedule of implementation
which incorporates the requirements specified by the director.
(vi) Provisions for installing additional
wells, as necessary, for determining the nature and extent of any release of
contaminants due to open burning of tires.
(d) Assessment monitoring schedule,
frequency, and parameters. Not later than two hundred seventy days after the
start of the fire, the responsible individual shall sample all wells on-site.
The responsible individual shall continue to sample all wells at least
quarterly after this initial sampling and analyze the samples for all
constituents listed in appendix I of this rule or any other constituents
required by the director.
(e) First
determination of rate, extent, and concentration. The responsible individual
shall implement the "ground water quality assessment plan" which satisfies the
requirements of paragraphs (G)(4)(b) and (G)(4)(c) of this rule and, at a
minimum, determine the rate, concentration and extent of migration of any
parameters required to be sampled for by paragraph (G)(4)(d) of this rule in
the ground water.
(f) Ground water
assessment report. The responsible individual shall make a determination
according to paragraph (G)(4)(e) of this rule within the time frame specified
in the submitted "ground water quality assessment plan." The responsible
individual shall submit to the appropriate Ohio EPA district office, not later
than fifteen days after making a determination, a written "ground water quality
assessment report" containing an assessment of the ground water quality
including all data generated as part of implementation of the "ground water
quality assessment plan."
(g)
Cessation of ground water monitoring.
(i) The
responsible individual may demonstrate that a source other than the scrap tire
fire caused the contamination, or that the elevated constituent concentration
resulted from error in sampling, analysis, or natural variation in ground water
quality. A report documenting this demonstration must be submitted to the
appropriate Ohio EPA district office along with a request that the director
approve cessation of the ground water monitoring program described in
paragraphs (G)(3) and (G)(4) of this rule.
(ii) Until the appropriate Ohio EPA district
office receives notice of approval of cessation of the ground water monitoring
program from the director, the responsible individual shall comply with
paragraphs (G)(4)(h) and (G)(5) of this rule.
(h) Semiannual determination of rate, extent,
and concentration. If the responsible individual determines, based on the
determination made according to paragraph (G)(4)(e) of this rule, that
parameters required to be sampled for by paragraph (G)(4)(d) of this rule from
the site or facility have entered the ground water, then the responsible
individual shall continue to make this determination on a semiannual basis
until released from this obligation by the director or unless an alternate time
interval is established by the director or his authorized representative. The
responsible individual shall submit documentation of the semiannual
determination of rate, extent, and concentration with the reports required to
be submitted in accordance with paragraph (G)(4)(j) of this rule.
(i) Notification of adjacent landowners.
After the determination of rate, extent, and concentration in accordance with
paragraph (G)(4)(e) of this rule, the responsible individual shall notify, by
certified mail or any other form of mail accompanied by a receipt, all persons
who own land or reside on the land that directly overlies any part of the plume
of the contamination, as determined in accordance with paragraph (G)(4)(e) of
this rule, of the rate, extent, and concentration of the parameters required to
be sampled for by paragraph (G)(4)(d) of this rule in the ground water. The
responsible individual shall submit copies of the return receipts or other
evidence of notification to the appropriate Ohio EPA district office. The
responsible individual shall re-notify persons or notify additional persons, as
necessary, but no more than annually, based on the results of the
determinations of rate, extent, and concentration.
(j) Semi-annual assessment activities report.
The responsible individual shall submit to the appropriate Ohio EPA district
office and to the approved health department, upon implementation of the
"ground water quality assessment plan" submitted under paragraph (G)(4)(c) of
this rule, a report on the activities being conducted at the site or facility
as part of implementation of the "ground water quality assessment plan." This
report shall be submitted semi-annually and contain the following:
(i) A narrative description of all assessment
activities that have occurred since the previous report.
(ii) All data generated as part of the
assessment program since the previous report.
(5) Corrective measures program.
(a) General requirements. Unless the director
approves cessation of the ground water monitoring program in accordance with
paragraph (G)(4)(g) of this rule, the responsible individual shall implement a
"corrective measures program" capable of evaluating all practical ground water
remediation procedures, attaining the concentration level for parameters
required to be sampled for by paragraph (G)(4)(d) of this rule detected in the
ground water, controlling the source of the release, and eliminating further
releases. The responsible individual shall implement the "corrective measures
program" in accordance with the "corrective measures plan" and the requirements
of this rule.
(b) Submission of
corrective measures plan. Within one hundred eighty days after making a
determination in accordance with paragraph (G)(4)(e) of this rule, the
responsible individual shall submit a "corrective measures plan" to the
director. The "corrective measures plan" shall evaluate all practical
remediation procedures which are available for remediating any contamination
discovered during assessment monitoring program." The evaluated remediation
procedures shall, at a minimum, do all of the following:
(i) Be protective of human health and the
environment.
(ii) Attain the
proposed ground water concentration levels specified in accordance with
paragraph (G)(5)(g) of this rule.
(iii) Control the source(s) of releases to
reduce or eliminate, to the maximum extent practical, further releases of
parameters required to be sampled for by paragraph (G)(4)(d) of this rule into
the environment.
(iv) Comply with
standards for management of wastes as specified in paragraph (G)(5)(m) of this
rule.
(c) The
responsible individual shall evaluate each proposed remediation procedure
within the corrective measures plan. This evaluation shall, at a minimum,
consider:
(i) Any potential remediation
procedure, which shall be assessed for the long-term and short-term
effectiveness and the protection it affords. This shall include the degree of
certainty that the remediation procedure will prove successful. Factors to be
considered include all of the following:
(a)
Magnitude of reduction of existing risks.
(b) Magnitude of residual risks in terms of
likelihood of further releases due to waste remaining following implementation
of a remediation procedure.
(c) The
type and degree of long-term management required, including monitoring,
operation, and maintenance.
(d)
Short-term risks that may affect the community, workers, or the environment
during implementation of such a remediation procedure, including potential
threats to human health and the environment associated with excavation,
transportation, disposal, or containment.
(e) Potential for human and environmental
receptor exposure to remaining wastes, considering the potential threat to
human health and the environment associated with excavation, transportation,
disposal, or containment.
(f)
Long-term reliability of the engineering and institutional controls.
(g) Potential need for replacement of the
remediation procedure.
(h) Time
until full protection is achieved.
(ii) The effectiveness of the remediation
procedure in controlling the source in order to reduce further releases,
including both of the following:
(a) The
extent to which containment practices will reduce further releases.
(b) The extent to which treatment
technologies may be used.
(iii) The need to coordinate with, and obtain
necessary approvals and permits from other agencies.
(iv) The available capacity and location of
needed treatment, storage, and disposal services.
(v) The ease or difficulty of implementing a
potential remedy(s) based on consideration of all of the following types of
factors:
(a) Degree of difficulty associated
with constructing the technologies.
(b) Expected operational reliability of the
technologies.
(c) Availability of
necessary equipment and specialists.
(vi) The degree to which community concerns
are addressed by a potential corrective measure; the performance, reliability,
ease of implementation, and potential impacts of the potential remediation
procedures, including safety impacts, cross-media impacts, and control of
exposure to any residual contamination.
(vii) A schedule for initiating and
completing each remediation procedure discussed in the plan. In establishing
this schedule, the responsible individual shall consider at a minimum all of
the following:
(a) The extent and nature of
any contamination.
(b) The
practical capability of remedial technologies to achieve compliance with ground
water concentration levels established in accordance with paragraph (G)(5)(g)
of this rule and other objectives of the remediation procedure.
(c) The availability of treatment or disposal
capacity for wastes managed during implementation of the remediation
procedure.
(d) The desirability of
utilizing technologies that are not currently available, but which may offer
significant advantages over currently available technologies in terms of
protection. Reliability, safety, or the ability to achieve remedial
objectives.
(e) Potential risks to
human health and the environment from contaminant exposure prior to completion
of the remediation procedure.
(f)
Practical capability of the responsible individual.
(g) Other relevant factors.
(viii) Resource value of the
ground water system, including all of the following:
(a) Current and future uses.
(b) Proximity and withdrawal rate of
users.
(c) Ground water quantity
and quality.
(d) The potential
damage to wildlife, crops, vegetation, and physical structures resulting from
exposure to waste constituents.
(e)
The hydrogeologic characteristics of the site or facility and surrounding
area.
(f) Ground water removal and
treatment costs.
(g) The cost and
availability of alternate water supplies.
(ix) Practical capability of the responsible
individual.
(x) Other relevant
factors.
(d) Public
meeting. The responsible individual shall do all of the following:
(i) Not later than thirty days after
submitting the "corrective measures plan" to the director, place copies of the
"ground water quality assessment report" and the "corrective measures plan" in
the nearest public library or other publicly accessible equivalent location to
the affected site or facility. The responsible individual shall periodically
revise and update the copies, but not later than annually. The copies shall be
made available to the public until a remedy is selected by the
director.
(ii) Within sixty days of
submitting the corrective measures plan to the director, discuss the results
and content of the "ground water quality assessment report" and the "corrective
measures plan" in a public meeting with interested and affected parties. The
responsible individual shall provide adequate and reasonable public notice of
the meeting, and the public meeting must be held at a place and time reasonably
convenient to the interested and affected parties.
(iii) Solicit public comment on the proposed
"corrective measures plan." Any public comments received shall be submitted to
the appropriate Ohio EPA district office and the approved health
department.
(e) The
director may require the responsible individual to evaluate, as part of the
corrective measures study, one or more specific potential remediation
procedures.
(f) Interim corrective
measures. If, at any time during the assessment described in paragraph (G)(4)
of this rule, the director determines that the site or facility threatens human
health or the environment, the director may require the responsible individual
to implement the following measures:
(i)
Notify all persons, by certified mail or any other form of mail accompanied by
a receipt, who own the land or reside on the land that directly overlies or
lies adjacent to any part of the plume of contamination.
(ii) Take any interim measures deemed
necessary by the director to ensure the protection of human health and the
environment. Interim measures should, to the extent practical, be consistent
with the objectives of and contribute to the performance of any remediation
procedure that may be required pursuant to paragraphs (G)(5)(a), (G)(5)(b),
(G)(5)(c), (G)(5)(d), and (G)(5)(g) of this rule. The following factors may be
considered by the director in determining whether interim measures are
necessary:
(a) The amount of time required to
develop and implement a final remediation procedure.
(b) Actual or potential exposure of nearby
populations or environmental receptors to parameters required to be sampled for
by paragraph (G)(4)(d) of this rule.
(c) Actual or potential contamination of
drinking water supplies or sensitive ecosystems.
(d) Any further degradation of the ground
water that may occur if remedial action is not initiated
expeditiously.
(e) Weather
conditions that may cause parameters required to be sampled for by paragraph
(G)(4)(d) of this rule to migrate or be released.
(f) Risks of fire, explosion, or potential
for exposure to parameters required to be sampled for by paragraph (G)(4)(d) of
this rule as a result of an accident or failure of a container or handling
system.
(g) Other situations that
threaten human health and the environment.
(g) Concentration levels for contaminants.
The corrective measures plan shall propose a concentration level for each scrap
tire-derived constituent which has been detected in the ground water at a
statistically significant level. These shall be established as follows:
(i) The proposed concentration levels in the
ground water shall be protective of human health and the environment.
(ii) Unless an alternate level is deemed
necessary to protect environmental receptors, then:
(a) For constituents for which a maximum
contaminant level has been promulgated under the "National Primary Drinking
Water Regulations," title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, part 141, (July 1,
2007)
(www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/index.html),
the maximum contaminant level for that constituent.
(b) For constituents for which maximum
contaminant levels have not been promulgated, the background concentration for
the constituent collected from hydraulically upgradient wells.
(c) If the responsible individual can
demonstrate to the director that a scrap tire-derived constituent found on
appendix I of this rule is already present in the ground water at a background
level, then the proposed concentration levels shall not be set below background
levels unless the director or his authorized representative determines that
cleanup to levels below background levels is necessary to protect human health
and the environment and such cleanup is in connection with an area-wide
remedial action under other authorities.
(iii) In establishing the proposed
concentration levels that meet the requirements of paragraph (G)(5)(g)(ii) of
this rule, the responsible individual shall consider all of the following:
(a) Multiple contaminants in the ground
water.
(b) Exposure threat to
sensitive environmental receptors.
(c) Other site-specific exposure or potential
exposure to ground water.
(d) The
reliability, effectiveness, practicality, and other relevant factors of the
remediation procedure.
(iv) The director may establish an
alternative ground water protection standard for constituents for which maximum
contaminant levels have not been established. These ground water protection
standards shall be appropriate health-based levels that satisfy any of the
following criteria:
(a) The level is derived
in a manner consistent with federal guidelines for assessing the health risks
of environmental pollutants.
(b)
The level is based on scientifically valid studies conducted in accordance with
the "Good Laboratory Practice Standards," title 40 Code of Federal Regulations,
part 792, (2007) (
www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/index.html)
or equivalent standards.
(c) For
known or suspected carcinogens, the proposed concentration levels shall be
established at concentration levels below those that represent a cumulative
(due to lifetime exposure) excess upperbound lifetime cancer risk to an
individual within the 1 X 10-4 to 1 X
10-6 range.
(d) For systemic toxicants, the proposed
concentration levels shall be reduced to levels to which the human population
(including sensitive subgroups) could be exposed on a daily basis without
appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime. For the purposes of
this rule, "systemic toxicants" include toxic chemicals that cause effects
other than cancer or mutation.
(h) Determination that remediation is not
necessary. The director may determine that remediation of a release of
parameters required to be sampled for by paragraph (G)(4)(d) of this rule from
the site or facility is not necessary if the responsible individual
demonstrates any of the following:
(i) The
ground water is additionally contaminated by substances that have originated
from a source other than the site or facility and those substances are present
in concentrations such that cleanup of the release from the site or facility
would provide no significant reduction in risk to actual or potential
receptors.
(ii) The constituent is
present in ground water that applies to the following:
(a) Is not currently or reasonably expected
to be a source of drinking water.
(b) Is not hydraulically connected with
waters to which the scrap tire-derived constituent(s) are migrating or are
likely to migrate in a concentration(s) that would exceed the ground water
concentration levels established under paragraph (G)(5)(g) of this
rule.
(iii) Remediation
of release(s) is technically impractical.
(iv) Remediation results in unacceptable
cross-media impacts.
(i)
A determination by the director pursuant to paragraph (G)(5)(h) of this rule
shall not affect the director's authority to require the responsible individual
to undertake source control measures or other measures that may be necessary to
eliminate or minimize further releases to ground water, to prevent exposure to
ground water, or to remediate ground water to concentrations that are
technically practical and significantly reduce threats to human health and the
environment.
(j) Selection of
corrective measure. The director shall select from the corrective measures
plan, or designate according to paragraph (G)(5)(f) of this rule, the
corrective measure which best meets the criteria listed in paragraphs
(G)(5)(b), (G)(5)(c), and (G)(5)(g) of this rule. The responsible individual
shall implement the corrective measure designated by the director in accordance
with the schedule of implementation selected by the director.
(k) Determination that corrective measure not
technically practical. The director may determine, based on information
developed by the responsible individual after implementation of the remediation
procedure has begun, or from other information, that compliance with the
requirement(s) for the remediation procedure selected under paragraphs
(G)(5)(g) of this rule is not technically practical. In making such a
determination, the director shall consider both of the following:
(i) The responsible party's efforts to
achieve compliance with the requirement(s).
(ii) Whether other currently available or new
methods or techniques could practicably achieve compliance with the
requirements.
(l)
Alternative measures. If the director determines that compliance with a
remediation procedure requirement is not technically practical, then the
director may require that the responsible individual do all of the following:
(i) Implement alternate measures to control
human or environmental receptor exposure to residual contamination, as
necessary, to protect human health and the environment.
(ii) Implement alternate measures for control
of the sources of contamination, or for removal or decontamination of
equipment, units, devices, or structures required to implement the remediation
procedure(s), that are as follows:
(a)
Technically practical.
(b)
Consistent with the overall objective of the remediation procedure.
(m) All solid wastes
that are managed pursuant to a remediation procedure required under paragraph
(G)(5)(f) of this rule, or an interim measure required under paragraph
(G)(5)(f) of this rule, shall be managed in the following manner:
(i) That is protective of human health and
the environment.
(ii) That complies
with applicable laws and regulations.
(n) Quarterly corrective measures activities
report. The responsible individual shall submit to the appropriate Ohio EPA
district office and the approved health department, upon implementation of the
remediation procedure chosen under paragraph (G)(5)(i) of this rule, a report
of the activities being conducted at the site or facility as part of
implementation of the corrective measures program. This report shall be
submitted quarterly and contain the following:
(i) A narrative description of all remedial
activities that have occurred since the previous report.
(ii) All data generated as part of the
remedial activities at the site or facility.
(o) Completion of corrective measures. The
corrective measures selected pursuant to paragraph (G)(5)(j) of this rule shall
be considered complete when all of the following are done:
(i) The responsible individual complies with
the ground water protection standards established under paragraph (G)(5)(g) of
this rule at all points within the plume of contamination that lie beyond the
limits of the scrap tire fire site or facility.
(ii) Compliance with the ground water
protection standards established under paragraph (G)(5)(g) of this rule has
been achieved by demonstrating semiannually via ground water monitoring that
the contamination has not exceeded the ground water protection standards for a
period of three years using the procedures in paragraph (G)(3)(d) of this rule.
The director may specify an alternative length of time during which the
responsible individual shall demonstrate that the contamination has not
exceeded the ground water protection standards taking into account all of the
following considerations:
(a) Extent and
concentration of the contamination.
(b) Behavior characteristics of the
contamination in the ground water.
(c) Accuracy of monitoring or modeling
techniques, including any seasonal, meteorological, or other environmental
variabilities that may affect the accuracy.
(d) Characteristics of the ground
water.
(iii) All actions
required to complete the corrective measure have been satisfied.