(A) No public
employer shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any public
employee because the
public employee in good
faith has:
(1) Filed any complaint under or
related to the act;
(2)
Instituted, or caused to be instituted, any proceeding under or related to the
act;
(3) Testified, or is about to testify, in any proceeding under or related to the act;
or
(4) Exercised on his own
behalf, or on the behalf of others, any right afforded by the act.
(B) Any public employee who believes that
he has
they
have been discharged or otherwise discriminated against by any public
employer in violation of paragraph (A) of this rule, and who wishes to file a complaint, must elect any one of the remedies provided for in
division (B) of section
4167.13 of the Revised
Code.
(C) Nothing in this rule
limits a public employer's right to take any actions provided in
rules
rule
4167-2-01 to 4167-2-04 of the
Administrative Code.
(D) Actions
taken by the public employer which adversely affect a public employee shall be
predicated upon nondiscrimination grounds. The proscriptions of paragraph (A)
of this rule apply when the adverse action occurs because the
public employee has engaged in protected
activities. An
A
public employee's engagement in activities protected by the act does not
automatically render the public employee immune
from discharge or discipline for legitimate reasons, or from adverse action
dictated by nonprohibited considerations.
(E) To establish a violation of paragraph (A)
of this rule, the public employee's activity need
not be the sole consideration behind discharge or other adverse action. If
protected activity was a substantial reason for the action, paragraph (A) of
this rule has been violated.
(F)
Discharge of, or discrimination against, an
a public employee
because the public employee has filed any
complaint under or related to this act is prohibited by this rule. An example
of a complaint made under the act would be an
a public employee
request pursuant to section
4167.11 of the Revised Code.
However, this would not be the only type of
complaint protected by this rule. The range of complaints related to
the act is commensurate with the broad remedial purposes of the act and the
sweeping scope of its application.
(G) Complaints made to other state, local,
and federal agencies regarding occupational safety and health
would
may be
related to the act. Such complaints, however
for protection under
this rule, must be related to conditions at the workplace, as
distinguished from complaints touching only upon general public safety and
health.
(H) Discharge of, or
discrimination against, any
public employee
because the
public employee has instituted
, or caused to be instituted
, any proceeding under or related to the act is also
prohibited by paragraph (A) of this rule. Examples of proceedings which could
arise specifically under the act would be inspections as a result of
public employee requests,
public employee participation in employer variance
requests,
public employee contests of abatement
dates, and
public employee challenges to an
order, rule, Ohio employment risk reduction standard proposed, adopted, or
issued by the superintendent. In determining whether a proceeding is related to
the act, paragraphs (F) and (G) of this rule are
to
be considered.
(I) An employee need not directly
institute the proceedings. It is sufficient if the employee sets into motion
activities of others which result in proceedings under or related to the
act.
(J) Discharge of, or discrimination
against, any employee because the employee has testified or is about to testify
in proceedings under or related to the act is prohibited by this
rule.
(K)(I) Discriminatory
protection is not limited to testimony in proceedings instituted or caused to
be instituted by the public employee, but would
extend
applies to any statements
or cooperation given in the course of judicial,
quasi-judicial, and administrative proceedings, including inspections,
and
investigations, or adjudicative
functions.
(L)(J) This rule protects
public employees from discrimination as a result
of the exercise of any right afforded by the act.
Certain rights exist by implication. For example, employees
may request information from the public employment risk reduction program. Such
requests would constitute the exercise of a right afforded by the act.
(M) Employees interviewed by
designees of the superintendent in the course of inspections or investigations
cannot subsequently be discriminated against because of their
cooperation.
(N)(K) There is no right
afforded by the act which would entitle
public
employees to refuse to work because of potential unsafe conditions at the
workplace unless the provisions of
rules
rule 4167-2-01
to
4167-2-04 of the Administrative Code are met.
An
A public
employee
will normally have the opportunity
to
may file a complaint with the
superintendent about the existence of a condition alleged to be hazardous that
has not been corrected by the
public employer
as provided in rule
4167-2-02 of the Administrative
Code.
Under such circumstances,
an
When a public employee refuses to perform
normal job activities because of alleged safety or health hazards, and the
provisions of rule
4167-2-01 of the Administrative
Code are not met, the public employer
would
not ordinarily be
is not in violation of
paragraph (A) of
rule
4167-9-01 of the Administrative
Code
this rule by taking action to
discipline
an
the
public employee
for refusing to perform normal
job activities because of alleged safety or health hazards.
(O)(L)
Employees
Public
employees who refuse to comply with occupational safety and health
standards or valid safety rules implemented by the public employer in furtherance of the act are not
exercising any rights afforded by the act. Disciplinary measures taken by
public employers solely in response to
public employee refusal to comply with
appropriate safety rules and regulations, will not ordinarily be regarded as discriminatory activity
prohibited by paragraph (A) of this rule.
(P)(M) A complaint of
discrimination under this rule must be filed by the public employee or by a public
employee representative or attorney
authorized to so do on the public employee's
behalf.
(Q)(N) The complaint must
be filed in accordance with the procedures listed in paragraph (B) of this
rule.
(R)(O) The sixty
- day period outlined in division (B)(1) of section
4167.13 of the Revised Code will
be stayed until the public employee knows or
should have known of extenuating circumstances, including but not limited to,
where the public employer has concealed or misled
the public employee regarding the grounds for
discharge or other adverse action, or where the discrimination is in the nature
of a continuing violation.