Ohio Admin. Code 5120:1-5-10 - Probation improvement and incentive grant
(A) A court of common pleas, municipal, or county probation department may apply
to the department of rehabilitation and correction for a probation improvement
and probation incentive grant for the purpose of adopting and administering
evidence-based programs, policies, projects, or practices to reduce the number
of felony offenders on community control
who violate the conditions of their supervision and are incarcerated
admitted to
prison.
(B) To be eligible
for a grant, a probation department must, at a minimum, satisfy each of the
following:
(1) During the period of the grant,
the probation department must be in compliance with each requirement imposed
upon probation departments under sections
2301.27 and
2301.30 of the Revised Code,
including, but not limited to, requirements imposed in those sections relative
to the appointment of chief probation officers, probation officer training, and
the establishment of policies and procedures for the supervision of individuals
on community control;
(2) The
probation department must demonstrate that it utilizes the Ohio risk assessment
system in accordance with section
5120.114 of the Revised Code
created by the university of Cincinnati's
center for criminal justice research in the supervision of its
offenders; and
(3) Each program,
policy, project, or practice to be funded through the grant shall be aimed at
facilitating a reduction in the number of felony offenders in the county
or municipality who violate the conditions of
their supervision and are incarcerated
admitted to prison.
(C) The amount of grants awarded to
individual probation departments under this rule shall be contingent upon the
amount of funds available to the department to award for that purpose at the
time application for a grant is made. Depending upon the availability of funds,
the department may, from time to time, establish such limitations on the
maximum amount of grants as are necessary to ensure broad-based participation
in the probation improvement and incentive grant program.
(D) In prioritizing applications for a
probation improvement grant and allocating the subsidies, the department shall
give priority to those applications from counties that have the greatest
potential to impact the state's prison population by reducing the number of
felony offenders on community control who violate the conditions of their
supervision. The factors that are relevant in identifying that potential impact
include, but are not limited to, the applicant's prior performance under any
grant awarded to the applicant pursuant to this rule and the following
measures:
(1) The proportion that the number
identified for the county under paragraph(D)(1)(a) of this rule bears to the
number identified under paragraph (D)(1)(b) of this rule;
(a) The average number of offenders that the
county's court of common pleas places under its probation department's
supervision each year, as determined by averaging the number of offenders
placed under the county probation department's supervision in each of the three
calendar years immediately preceding the calendar year in which application for
the grant is made;
(b) The average
number of felony offenders placed on community control statewide each year, as
determined by averaging the number of felony offenders placed on community
control statewide in each of the three calendar years immediately preceding the
calendar year in which application for the grant is made.
(2) The proportion that the number identified
for the county under paragraph(D)(2)(a) of this rule bears to the number
identified under paragraph (D)(2)(b) of this rule;
(a) The average number of offenders that the
county commits to the department each year for a felony of the fourth or fifth
degree, as determined by averaging the total number of such offenders committed
to the department from the county in each of the three
five calendar
years immediately preceding the calendar year in which application for the
grant is made;
(b) The average
number of offenders committed to the department each year statewide for a
felony of the fourth or fifth degree, as determined by averaging the total
number of such offenders committed to the department statewide in each of the
three
five
calendar years immediately preceding the calendar year in which application for
the grant is made.
(3)
The proportion that the number identified for the county under
paragraph(D)(3)(a) of this rule bears to the number identified under paragraph
(D)(3)(b) of this rule.
(a) The average
number of offenders that the county commits to the department each year for
violating the conditions of their community control, as determined by averaging
the total number of such offenders committed to the department from the county
in each of the three
five calendar years immediately preceding the
calendar year in which application for the grant is made;
(b) The average number of offenders committed
to the department each year statewide for violating the conditions of their
community control, as determined by averaging the total number of such
offenders committed to the department statewide in each of the
three
five
calendar years immediately preceding the calendar year in which application for
the grant is made.
(E) Probation departments shall apply for
grants in such manner as the department prescribes. At a minimum, every
application shall:
(1) Identify the specific
problem that the probation department intends to address;
(2) Provide statistical data that documents
the problem identified under paragraph(E)(1) of this rule;
(3) Identify the specific target population
within the more general class of individuals in the jurisdiction under
community control who are affected by the problem, including the number of
offenders that the probation department expects to be served by the
grant;
(4) Provide a detailed
overview of the proposed program, policy, project, or practice to be funded in
whole or in part by the grant;
(5)
Identify each entity, including any county or municipal court, that, in
addition to the court of common pleas probation department making the
application, will implement the program, policy, project, or practice proposed
in the application and its role in achieving the grant's goals;
(6) List contact information for the
individual in the probation department responsible for monitoring and reporting
activities for the grant;
(7)
Indicate the proposed goals and performance measures for the grant;
(8) Provide numerical data that will serve as
a baseline for measuring the performance goals identified under paragraph
(E)(7) of this rule;
(9) Specify
the amount of funding
the grant being requested;
(10) Identify all state and federal criminal
justice funding currently being provided to the applicant and to any partnering
entities identified by the applicant under paragraph (E)(5) of this
rule;
(11) Provide a brief
description of the local criminal justice system support for the proposal,
including, but not limited to, any letters of support from local officials,
organizations, and coalitions.
(F) If the department of rehabilitation and
correction awards a grant to a probation department pursuant to this rule, the
department and the probation department shall enter into an agreement that
specifies the terms of the grant, including, but not limited to, the grant
amount and performance measures that will be used to measure the probation
department's success in reducing the number of felony offenders on community
control who violate the conditions of their supervision and are admitted to
prison.
(G)
Each program, policy, project, or practice to be funded
through the grant are subject to program standards in rule
5120:1-5-08 of the
Administrative Code as determined by the bureau of community
sanctions.
Notes
Promulgated Under: 119.03
Statutory Authority: 5120.01, 5149.31, 5149.311
Rule Amplifies: 5149.311
Prior Effective Dates: 12/26/2011, 04/08/2017
Promulgated Under: 119.03
Statutory Authority: 5120.01, 5149.31, 5149.311
Rule Amplifies: 5149.311
Prior Effective Dates: 12/26/2011
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.