Or. Admin. Code § 340-040-0030 - Permitted Operations
(1) Permits
required by point sources shall specify appropriate groundwater quality
protection requirements. Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) permits may be
used in cases other than for those covered by Solid Waste Disposal Facility
permits, NPDES permits, On-Site Sewage Disposal permits, or Hazardous Waste
Facility permits.
(2) The
Department shall review and evaluate appropriate technical information and
reports submitted by permitted sources to determine the potential for adverse
impacts to groundwater quality. Where the above technical information and
reports indicate that there is a likely adverse groundwater quality impact, the
Department shall require through the permits and rules referred to in OAR
340-040-0020(12),
and other appropriate statutory and administrative authorities, the following
groundwater quality protection program:
(a)
Groundwater Monitoring Requirements. The permittee or permit applicant shall
submit to the Department for approval a groundwater monitoring plan for the
uppermost aquifer and any other potentially affected aquifers. The groundwater
monitoring plan shall be capable of determining rate and direction of
groundwater movement, and monitoring the groundwater quality immediately
upgradient and downgradient from the waste management area. The plan shall
include, but not be limited to, detailed information on the following:
(A) System Design:
(i) Well Locations;
(ii) Well Construction;
(iii) Background Monitoring
Point(s);
(iv) Detection Monitoring
Point(s);
(v) Water Quality
Compliance Point(s).
(B)
Sample Collection and Analysis:
(i)
Parameters to be Sampled;
(ii)
Sampling Frequency and Duration;
(iii) Sample Collection Methods;
(iv) Sample Handling and Chain of
Custody;
(v) Analytical
Methods;
(vi) Acceptable Minimum
Reporting Levels;
(vii) Quality
Assurance and Quality Control Plan.
(C) Data Analysis Procedure:
(i) Statistical Analysis Method;
(ii) Frequency of Analysis.
(b) Reporting
Requirements. The facility permit shall specify monitoring and assessment
reporting requirements;
(c)
Background Monitoring Point(s) Requirements. The permittee shall monitor the
background water quality of the uppermost aquifer. The background monitoring
point(s) shall be located where water quality is unaffected by facility
operation;
(d) Downgradient
Detection Monitoring Point(s) Requirements. The permittee shall monitor the
aquifer directly downgradient from the waste management area to ensure
immediate detection of waste released to groundwater. This shall be known as
the downgradient detection monitoring point(s);
(e) Compliance Point(s) Requirements. The
Department shall specify the location at which groundwater quality parameters
must be at or below the permit-specific concentration limits. Unless otherwise
specified by the Department, that location will be defined by a vertical plane
located along the waste management area boundary. Any monitoring point on that
plane is a compliance point. The compliance point(s) may not necessarily be the
same as the downgradient detection monitoring point(s).
(3) Concentration Limits. The facility permit
shall specify the maximum contaminant concentration allowed at the compliance
point(s). Unless otherwise established according to the variance procedure
contained in section (4) of this rule, the Department shall set permit-specific
concentration limits at new and existing facilities as established below:
(a) Concentration Limit at Existing
Facilities: The concentration limit at existing facilities shall be established
by the Department on a case-by-case basis. The concentration limit at these
facilities may be established at any level between background water quality
levels and the numerical groundwater quality reference levels or guidance
levels as listed in Tables 1 through 3 of this division unless the background
water quality is above those numerical levels. If the background water quality
exceeds those numerical levels, then the concentration limit shall be
established at the background level. When a contaminant of concern has no
numerical level listed in Tables 1 through 3 of this division, the
permit-specific concentration limit shall not exceed background water quality
levels;
(b) Concentration Limit at
New Facilities: The permit-specific concentration limits at new facilities
shall be established at the background water quality levels for all
contaminants.
(4)
Concentration Limit Variance:
(a) Upon
request by the permittee, Department, or permit applicant, and after
opportunity for public review and comment, a concentration limit variance may
be granted as an alternative to the permit-specific concentration limits
specified in section (3) of this rule provided an existing, permit-specific
concentration limit has not been exceeded at a compliance point;
(b) The Director may grant such concentration
limit variances for concentrations up to but not exceeding numerical
groundwater quality reference levels contained in Tables 1 and 2 of this
division; concentrations up to and above numerical groundwater quality guidance
levels contained in Table 3 of this division; and concentrations for
contaminants for which there are no reference or guidance levels in Tables 1
through 3 of this division. Concentration limit variances in excess of a
numerical groundwater quality reference level listed in Tables 1 and 2 of this
division may only be granted by the EQC;
(c) The EQC or Director, as specified in
subsection (4)(b) of this rule, may grant on a case-by-case determination a
concentration limit variance for a pollutant provided no substantial present or
potential hazard to human health or the environment is posed at that level. The
party requesting the concentration limit variance shall provide all data
required for consideration of the variance, and shall identify where gaps exist
in the data for the required analysis. In establishing concentration limit
variances, the EQC or Director shall consider the effects on groundwater
quality, interconnected surface water quality, and associated effects on
beneficial uses. Among others, the following factors shall be considered:
(A) The physical and chemical characteristics
of the pollutant and degradation products, including the potential for
migration;
(B) The hydrogeologic
characteristics at the facility and the surrounding area;
(C) The quantity of groundwater and the
direction of groundwater flow;
(D)
The proximity and withdrawal rates of groundwater users;
(E) The current and future uses of
groundwater in the area;
(F) The
existing quality of the groundwater, including other sources of pollution and
their cumulative impact on water quality;
(G) The potential for health risks caused by
exposure to the pollutant and its degradation products;
(H) The potential damage to wildlife, crops,
vegetation, and physical structures caused by exposure to the pollutant and its
degradation products;
(I) The
persistence and permanence of potential adverse effects of the contaminant and
its degradation products;
(J) The
proximity and interconnections with surface water in the area;
(K) The potential effect on interconnected
surface water;
(L) The potential
effect of the pollutant and its degradation products on ecosystems of the area;
and
(M) The comparative feasibility
and cost of obtaining the permit-specific concentration limit and the
concentration limit variance.
(5) Action Requirements:
(a) Resampling: If monitoring indicates a
significant increase (increase or decrease for pH) in the value of a parameter
monitored, the permittee shall immediately resample. If the resampling confirms
the change in water quality, the permittee shall:
(A) Report the results to the Department
within 10 days of receipt of the laboratory data; and
(B) Prepare and submit to the Department
within 30 days a plan for developing a preliminary assessment unless another
time schedule is approved by the Department.
(b) Preliminary Assessment Plan: The
preliminary assess-ment plan must provide for an assessment of the source,
extent, and potential migration of the pollution; a time schedule for the
implementation of the preliminary assessment plan activities; and an evaluation
of whether or not action will be necessary to remain within the concentration
limit at the Department approved compliance point(s);
(c) Preventive Action: In order to prevent
additional ground-water pollution from occurring, the Department shall require
the utilization of all available and reasonable technology to decrease or
prevent the release of additional contaminants when a significant change in
water quality has occurred at a detection monitoring point.
(6) Remedial Action Requirements:
(a) If the monitoring indicates a
concentration limit for a contaminant other than those listed in Table 3 of
this division is violated at a compliance point, the Department shall require a
remedial investigation and feasibility study be conducted by the permittee
pursuant to the requirements contained in OAR
340-040-0040, and remedial
action conducted pursuant to the requirements contained in OAR
340-040-0050;
(b) If the monitoring indicates a
concentration limit for a contaminant listed in Table 3 of this division is
violated at a compliance point and if the permittee demonstrates to the
Director's satisfaction that beneficial uses are being protected, the permittee
will not be required to conduct a remedial investigation and feasibility study
in accordance with OAR
340-040-0040, or to conduct
remedial action pursuant to the requirements contained in OAR
340-040-0050. However, if the
Director determines that beneficial uses are not being protected, the
Department shall require adequate remedial investigation necessary to
characterize the extent of the pollution, and shall also require appropriate
remedial action to protect beneficial uses.
Notes
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 468 & 468B
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 468B.050 & 468B.065
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.